| Literature DB >> 30577416 |
Francesca Gaggìa1, Loredana Baffoni2, Michele Galiano3, Dennis Sandris Nielsen4, Rasmus Riemer Jakobsen5, Josue Leonardo Castro-Mejía6, Sara Bosi7, Francesca Truzzi8, Federica Musumeci9, Giovanni Dinelli10, Diana Di Gioia11.
Abstract
Kombucha is usually obtained from the fermentation of black or green tea by a consortium of acetic acid bacteria and yeasts. In this study, kombucha was prepared from the same starter consortium using green and black teas as well as, for the first time, an infusion of rooibos leaves (Aspalathus linearis). Microbial diversity was analysed during fermentation both in the biofilm and in the corresponding kombuchas, using culture-dependent and -independent methods. Polyphenols, flavonoids, ethanol, and acids were quantified and anti-oxidant activities were monitored. All of the Kombuchas showed similarity in bacterial composition, with the dominance of Komagataeibacter spp. Beta diversity showed that the yeast community was significantly different among all tea substrates, between 7 and 14 days of fermentation and between biofilm and kombucha, indicating the influence of the substrate on the fermenting microbiota. Kombucha from rooibos has a low ethanol concentration (1.1 mg/mL), and a glucuronic acid amount that was comparable to black tea. Although antioxidant activity was higher in black and green kombucha compared to rooibos, the latter showed an important effect on the recovery of oxidative damage on fibroblast cell lines against oxidative stress. These results make rooibos leaves interesting for the preparation of a fermented beverage with health benefits.Entities:
Keywords: fermentation; kombucha; oxidative stress; rooibos
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30577416 PMCID: PMC6356548 DOI: 10.3390/nu11010001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Best-match identification of acetic acid bacteria (AAB) isolates from films and kombucha teas obtained by nBLAST.
| Isolates | Source | Closest Match (% similarity *) | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR-3 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099856 | |
| FR-10 | Kombucha rooibos | MK106667 | |
| FG-14 | Kombucha green tea | MK099857 | |
| FB-12 | Film black tea | MK099859 | |
| KB-16 | Kombucha black tea | MK099858 | |
| KG-15 | Kombucha green tea | MK099860 | |
| KR-9 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099861 | |
| KR-17 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099862 | |
| KR-11 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099863 | |
| KR-1 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099864 | |
| KR-2 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099865 | |
| KR-3 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099866 | |
| KR-4 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099867 | |
| KR-5 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099868 | |
| KG-16 | Kombucha green tea | MK099869 | |
| KG-2; | Kombucha green tea | MK099870 | |
| KG-5 | Kombucha green tea | MK099871 | |
| KG-13 | Kombucha green tea | MK099872 | |
| KB-17 | Kombucha black tea | MK099873 | |
| KG-14 | Kombucha green tea | MK099874 | |
| KG-17 | Kombucha green tea | MK099875 | |
| KG-18 | Kombucha green tea | MK099876 | |
| KG-26 | Kombucha green tea | MK099877 | |
| KG-27 | Kombucha green tea | MK099878 | |
| FB-9 | Film black tea | MK099879 | |
| KB-25 | Kombucha black tea | MK099880 | |
| KR-10 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099881 | |
| KR-16 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099882 | |
| KR-24 | Kombucha rooibos | MK099883 |
* Similarity represents the % similarity shared with the sequences in the GenBank database.
Best-match identification of yeast isolates from films and kombucha teas obtained by nBLAST.
| Isolates | Source | Closest Match (% similarity *) | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| YFB-2 | Film black tea | MH930858 | |
| YFB-9 | Film black tea | MH930859 | |
| YFB-18 | Film black tea | MH930860 | |
| YFR-15 | Film rooibos | MH930861 | |
| YFR-6 | Film rooibos | MH930862 | |
| YKB-1 | Kombucha black tea | MH930863 | |
| YKB-2 | Kombucha black tea | MH930864 | |
| YKB-9 | Kombucha black tea | MH930865 | |
| YKR-2 | Kombucha rooibos | MH930866 | |
| YKR-3 | Kombucha rooibos | MH930867 |
* Similarity represents the % similarity shared with the sequences in the GenBank database.
Figure 1The influence of substrate and matrix on bacterial community structure of kombucha (family level), after 14 days of fermentation, as determined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, showing in (a) the relative abundance from 0 to 100% and (b) the focus in the range between 98% and 100%.
Figure 2The influence of matrix (plot) and substrate (only table) on kombucha bacterial community structure after 14 days of fermentation illustrated as a PCoA plot. Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index determined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (pairwise ANOSIM, 999 permutations).
Figure 3The influence of substrate and matrix on bacterial community structure of kombucha (family level) after 7 (a) and 14 (b) days of fermentation, as determined by internal transcribed spacer two (ITS2) gene amplicon sequencing.
Figure 4The influence of substrate (plot, table), matrix (only table) and fermentation time (only on kombucha fungal community structure after 14 days of fermentation illustrated as a PCoA plot of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index determined by ITS2 gene amplicon sequencing (pairwise ANOSIM, 999 permutations).
Concentration (mg/mL) of glucose, sucrose, and fructose in Kombucha prepared with black tea (KR), green tea (KG), and rooibos tea (KR) at 7 and 14 day of fermentation.
| Substrate | Glucose | Sucrose | Fructose | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 14 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 14 | |
| KB | 11.20 ± 0.99 | 15.12 ± 0.64 | 36.23 ± 0.03 | 26.13 ± 0.43 | 4.84 ± 0.001 | 5.50 ± 0.13 |
| KG | 11.40 ± 0.22 | 15.89 ± 0.06 | 37.14 ± 0.09 | 26.21 ± 0.14 | 5.12 ± 0.02 | 6.92 ± 0.02 |
| KR | 8.60 ± 0.14 A | 18.10 ± 0.20 B | 42.08 ± 0.09 | 33.65 ± 0.05 | 4.07 ± 0.04 A | 8.83 ± 0.04 B |
(A,B) different letters showed significant difference between different sampling times for the same substrate (Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05. No letters showed no significance.
Concentration (mg/mL) of glucuronic acid (GlcUA), Acetic acid and ethanol (EtOH) in Kombucha prepared with black tea (KR), green tea (KG), and rooibos tea (KR) at 7 and 14 day of fermentation.
| Substrate | GlcUA | AA | EtOH | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 14 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 14 | |
| KB | 1.36 ± 0.08 A | 3.23 ± 0.64 B | 3.18 ± 0.003 A | 9.18 ± 0.15 B | 4.69 ± 0.05 b | 5.83 ± 0.08 a |
| KG | 1.78 ± 0.12 | 1.96 ± 0.10 | 4.22 ± 0.02 | 7.65 ± 0.003 | 2.81 ± 0.01 ab | 4.18 ± 0.03 ab |
| KR | 1.70 ± 0.09 | 2.87 ± 0.47 | 1.65 ± 0.004 | 4.89 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.01 a | 1.14 ± 0.01 b |
(a,b) different letters showed significant difference between different substrate in the same sampling time (Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05); (A,B) different letters showed significant difference between different sampling times for the same substrate (Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05). No letters showed no significance.
Polyphenols and flavonoids content and antioxidant activity of kombuchas 0, 7, and 14 days of fermentation.
| Kombucha | Polyphenols (mg/g DW) | Flavonoids (mg/g DW) | DPPH Test (mmol TE/g DW) | FRAP Test (mmol Fe++/g DW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0G | 74.40 ± 1.64 b | 16.57 ± 0.21 b | 0.31 ± 0.01 c | 0.70 ± 0.01 c |
| K7G | 100.33 ± 2.36 a | 18.49 ± 0.73 a | 1.31 ± 0.07 a | 1.75 ± 0.06 a |
| K14G | 67.40 ± 2.69 c | 15.11 ± 0.22 c | 0.98 ± 0.01 b | 1.13 ± 0.06 b |
| K0B | 79.38 ± 0.77 a | 17.97 ± 0.05 a | 0.31 ± 0.01 b | 0.68 ± 0.02 b |
| K7B | 64.81 ± 2.91 b | 14.46 ± 0.19 b | 0.87 ± 0.01 a | 0.90 ± 0.04 a |
| K14B | 67.20 ± 3.48 b | 13.87 ± 0.79 b | 0.85 ± 0.02 a | 0.86 ± 0.03 a |
| K0R | 43.51 ± 2.89 ab | 21.72 ± 0.01 a | 0.18 ± 0.01 c | 0.49 ± 0.05 a |
| K7R | 45.32 ± 1.36 a | 18.15 ± 0.52 b | 0.45 ± 0.03 a | 0.52 ± 0.01 a |
| K14R | 40.89 ± 1.25 b | 17.33 ± 0.84 c | 0.41 ± 0.01 b | 0.47 ± 0.04 a |
Values of each kombucha (means ± sd) with different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). DW: Dry Weight; TE: Trolox equivalent
Calibration curves with correlation coefficient (R2) and m/z value for each catechins.
| Analyte | Concentration range (ppm) | Calibration equation | R2 | m/z |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKG, KB | 0.05–2.00 | y = 3.73E+06x + 1.76E+04 | 0.9999 | 290.3 |
| ECKG | 12.5–50 | y =7.30E+05x + 1.58E+07 | 0.9817 | 290.3 |
| ECKB | 0.05–5 | y = 3.34E+06x + 2.54E+04 | 0.9998 | 290.3 |
| GCKG, KB | 0.1–5 | y = 3.64E+06x + 1.38E+05 | 0.9962 | 306.3 |
| EGCKG | 12.5–80 | y = 9.09E+05x + 1.46E+07 | 0.9941 | 306.3 |
| EGCKB | 0.1–5 | y = 2.85E+06x + 3.07E+05 | 0.9843 | 306.3 |
| ECGKG, KB | 0.05–1 | y = 5.26E+06x − 7.05E+04 | 0.9999 | 442.4 |
| EGCGKG, KB | 12.5–50 | y = 7.11E+05x + 5.88E+05 | 0.9996 | 458.4 |
C: (+)-catechin; EC: (−)-epicatechin; GC: (+)-gallocatechin; EGC: (−)-epigallocatechin; CG: (−)-catechingallate; ECG: (−)-epicatechingallate; GCG: (−)-gallocatechingallate; EGCG: (−)-epigallocatechingallate; KG: kombucha from green tea; KB: kombucha from black tea.
Content of catechins in kombucha samples expressed as mg/g DW ± s.d.
| Kombucha | C | EC | GC | EGC | ECG | EGCG | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K0G | 0.173 a | 2.903 a | 0.505 a | 9.086 b | 0.080 | 5.506 a | 18.253 a |
| K7G | 0.019 b | 1.541 b | 0.098 c | 7.084 c | n.d. | 1.029 b | 9.770 c |
| K14G | 0.019 b | 1.769 b | 0.110 bc | 9.650 a | n.d. | 0.296 c | 11.844 b |
| K0B | 0.083 a | 0.413 a | 0.081 a | 0.304 b | 0.095 | 1.209 a | 2.184 a |
| K7B | 0.015 b | 0.134 b | 0.026 b | 0.431 a | n.d. | 0.385 b | 0.99 b |
| K14B | 0.008 b | 0.080 bc | 0.003 b | 0.270 b | n.d. | 0.104 c | 0.464 c |
| K0R | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| K7R | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| K14R | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
Values of each kombucha (means ± s.d.) with different letters are significantly different (Tukey’s test, p ≤ 0.05). n.d.: not detected.
Figure 5Effects of rooibos kombuchas on L929 cell proliferation; data, expressed as % of control, represent mean ±2 SEM of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis of differences was carried out by two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s LSD as post-hoc test. Different letters represent statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6L929 cell proliferation after oxidative stress: (a) “Curative model” and (b) “Preventive model”. Data, expressed as % of control, represent mean ±2 SEM of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis of differences was carried out by two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s LSD as post-hoc test. Different letters represent statistical significance: (p ≤ 0.05).