Literature DB >> 29936659

Is Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use Increasing? Assessing Trends Among U.S. College Women, 2008-2013.

Rachel G Logan1, Erika L Thompson2,3, Cheryl A Vamos2, Stacey B Griner2, Coralia Vázquez-Otero2, Ellen M Daley2.   

Abstract

Objective To assess LARC use trends among college women (18-24 years) and identify groups that have increased LARC use. Methods Data were extracted from the National College Health Assessment-II (NCHA-II) fall 2008-2013 surveys. Logistic regression statistics were used to assess LARC use. Results Although LARC use increased from 2008 to 2013 (aOR = 2.62; 95% CI 2.23-3.07), less than half of the sample (44%) reported using contraception at last vaginal sex. Only 2.5% of college women in this study reported using a LARC method; of LARC users, 90% reported using an intrauterine device. Nearly all sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with increases in LARC use including: age, sexual orientation, and insurance status. Conclusions LARC use significantly increased among college women. However, less effective methods such as condoms and short-acting reversible contraceptives are used more frequently. Promoting LARC use for women who desire to effectively prevent pregnancy can reduce unintended pregnancy and improve health outcomes for women while in college. Future work should examine the importance of individual and lifestyle factors that influence college women's decision to choose a LARC method and seek to eliminate barriers to college women choosing a contraceptive method they believe works best for them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth control; College women; LARC; Long-acting reversible contraception; NCHA; Unintended pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29936659     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-018-2560-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  29 in total

1.  Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students.

Authors:  Robyn L Fielder; Michael P Carey
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2010

2.  Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Disparities in family planning.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Kira Levy; Sonya Borrero; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women.

Authors:  Kendra L Fleming; Abby Sokoloff; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  A qualitative analysis of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Annalise Baker-Whitcomb; Andrea L DeMaria
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

6.  Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention With Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Factors Associated With Dual Use.

Authors:  Erika L Thompson; Cheryl A Vamos; Stacey B Griner; Rachel Logan; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Ellen M Daley
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Fifty years on "the pill": a qualitative analysis of nondaily contraceptive options.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Young Age, Nulliparity, and Continuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.

Authors:  Margaret Abraham; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Jenna Jerman; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants.

Authors:  Rebecca G Simmons; Jessica N Sanders; Claudia Geist; Lori Gawron; Kyl Myers; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Placement, Continuation, and Removal Rates at an Inner-City Academic Medical Center Clinic.

Authors:  Aliye Runyan; Robert A Welch; Katherine J Kramer; Sarah Cortez; LeAnne J Roberts; Clementina Asamoah; Sarah Ottum; Jessica Sanders; Adib Shafi; Maurice-Andre Recanati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.