Literature DB >> 30576350

Haplotypes in the CYP2R1 gene are associated with levels of 25(OH)D and bone mineral density, but not with other markers of bone metabolism (MrOS Sweden).

Anne Björk1, Dan Mellström2, Claes Ohlsson3, Magnus Karlsson4, Hans Mallmin5, Gunnar Johansson6, Östen Ljunggren1, Andreas Kindmark1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Polymorphisms in the CYP2R1 gene encoding Vitamin D 25-hydroxylase have been reported to correlate with circulating levels of 25-OH vitamin D3 (25(OH)D). It is unknown whether these variations also affect overall bone metabolism. In order to elucidate the overall associations of polymorphisms in the CYP2R1, we studied haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene and serum levels of 25(OH)D, calcium, phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23), as well as bone mineral density (BMD).
METHODS: Baseline data on serum parameters and BMD from MrOS Sweden, a prospective population-based cohort study of elderly men (mean age 75 years, range 69-81), were analyzed. Genotyping was performed for eight SNPs covering the CYP2R1 gene in 2868 men with available samples of DNA. Subjects were followed up concerning incidence of fracture during five years.
RESULTS: There was a significant genetic association with circulating levels of 25(OH)D (4.6-18.5% difference in mean values between SNP alleles), but there were no correlations with levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH or FGF23 for any genetic variant. No differences were found in fracture incidence between the variants. There was an inverse relationship between lower BMD and concomitant higher 25(OH)D for three of the haplotypes (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Common variants in the CYP2R1 gene encoding Vitamin D 25-hydroxylase correlate with levels of circulating 25(OH)D but do not otherwise associate with measures of calcium and phosphate homeostasis. Presence of the specific haplotypes may be an indicator of risk for low 25(OH)D levels, and may in addition be correlated to bone mineral density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30576350      PMCID: PMC6303094          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The increasing incidence of osteoporosis-related fractures with increasing age is a major health problem, leading to suffering and increased mortality, as well as economic problems for both the individual and society [1, 2]. Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mineral density (BMD), and bone micro architectural deterioration. Both environmental and hereditary factors have been shown be important and to interact, for BMD as well as for fractures [3-5]. Twin and family-based osteoporosis studies have indicated that as much as 60 to 85% of the variance in BMD is genetically determined [6], and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), associated with low BMD, osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures [7]. Calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), and vitamin D are all essential for bone metabolism and the maintenance of the strength and function of the skeleton. The role of vitamin D, in this context, is to participate in the regulation of Ca homeostasis. Thus, the active metabolite of vitamin D stimulates calcium absorption from the gut. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) acts on the skeleton by enhancing the release of calcium from the bones. It also regulates renal calcium handling. By stimulating the conversion of 25(OH)D into the active form 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, PTH also causes an enhanced absorption of calcium in the intestine. Another important phosphate regulating factor participating in bone and mineral metabolism is the fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) which in turn is regulated by levels of phosphate and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [8, 9]. Vitamin D deficiency can lead to musculoskeletal diseases such as rickets and osteomalacia, but vitamin D supplementation may also prevent extra skeletal diseases such as respiratory tract infections, asthma exacerbations, pregnancy complications and premature deaths. [10] Vitamin D deficiency leads to a decrease in intestinal calcium absorption and ultimately to a transient decrease in ionized calcium. The 25(OH)D-concentration in blood is regarded as the best measure of an individual’s overall vitamin D status [11]. The diet may contain vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) or vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), the latter mainly in fish, dairy products or additions to margarine or milk. Most supplements contain cholecalciferol. Ergocalciferol is generated in some foods (mushrooms) by UV radiation. Whether produced in the body from the diet (mainly in fish, dairy products, additions to margarine or milk and supplements) or dermal synthesis from sunlight containing UVB, vitamin D is initially biologically inactive, and activation requires enzymatic conversion (hydroxylation) in the liver and kidney. The enzyme vitamin D 25-hydroxylase, encoded by the CYP2R1 gene, has been shown to be a key enzyme for the conversion in the liver of cholecalciferol into the form (calcidiol) [12]. Variants near the CYP2R1 gene have also been shown to influence circulating levels of 25(OH)D, and genome-wide significance for association between levels of the vitamin has been shown for one of the CYP2R1 SNPs; rs10741657 [13]. A Danish study has also shown that common polymorphisms in the vitamin D binding protein (VDBP encoded by the gene GC) and CYP2R1 are associated with 25(OH)D concentrations in the Caucasian population and that certain haplotypes may predispose to lower 25(OH)D concentrations in late summer in Denmark [14]. Genetic variation is in turn also believed to explain 79.4% of the variation of levels of the VDBP, but only 9.9% of the variation in 25(OH)D levels [15]. Several studies indicate that allelic variation in CYP2R1 (rs10741657) affects vitamin D levels [16-18]. It is not clear how other biochemical markers and BMD are associated with polymorphisms in the CYP2R1 gene. Apart from a study of postmenopausal Chinese women which showed no significant association between 10766197 and BMD, no genetic association studies analyzing the CYP2R1 gene and BMD have been published [19]. The aims of the present study were to investigate the relationship between polymorphisms and haplotypes in the CYP2R1 gene and levels of 25(OH)D, as well as other biochemical parameters (PTH, Ca, P and FGF23) of calcium homeostasis. In addition, possible associations between genetic variation in CYP2R1 with BMD of the hip, lumbar spine and femoral neck as well as fracture incidence during the five years following baseline were investigated.

Materials and methods

Subjects

The MrOS study is a multi-center, prospective cohort study of elderly men in Sweden, Hong Kong and the USA [20]. The present study used data from the Swedish part of MrOS (n = 3014), recruited at medical centers in Uppsala (n = 999), Gothenburg (n = 1010) and Malmö (n = 1005). Men aged 69–81 years were randomly identified using national population registers. To be eligible for the study, participants had to be able to walk without aids, provide self-reported data and give signed informed consent. There were no other exclusion criteria. The participation rate in MrOS Sweden was 45%. In the present report, the baseline data in MrOS Sweden were used for biochemical markers and BMD measurements. Fracture data available after 5 years from baseline were analyzed. Diabetes incidence was estimated from a health questionnaire at baseline., The diagnoses were not validated by searching in the charts. Informed consent was obtained for all subjects and the study was approved by the l The Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, (Dnr LU 693–00), the Central Ethical Review Board at Gothenburg university (Dnr Gbg M 014–01) and the Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala (Ups 01–057). The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

Genotyping of the CYP2R1 gene

DNA was isolated from whole blood extracted at baseline from all participants where blood samples were available, in total 2870 participants. Using a saturation approach representing HapMap SNPs and HaploView scoring, a total of 11 SNPs covering 100 kb of the genetic region surrounding the CYP2R1 gene including the 3’ and 5’ untranslated regions (UTRs) were selected. Genotyping was performed using the Sequenom Mass ARRAY iPLEX Gold technology (Sequenom Inc., Newton, MA) by single base primer extension and MALDI TOF Mass Spectrometry. Successful genotyping was obtained from 8 SNPs (rs10766197, rs11023374, rs10741657, rs10832313, rs16930609, rs16930625, rs11023371 and rs7936142) with overall call rate of 97.8%. Allele frequencies were calculated and found to be in Hardy-Weinberg (HW) equilibrium in the cohort for all SNPs. Haploview software version 4.2 was used to calculate linkage disequilibrium (LD) values, generate haplotype blocks and diagrams, as well as suggesting tagging SNPs using the tagger algorithm [21]. The preselected SNPs and haplotypes computed using the Arlequine population genetic data analysis program, were analyzed for associations between vitamin D values and other biochemical parameters (calcium, phosphate, FGF-23 and PTH), as well as markers of bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar spine and total hip).

Serum measurements

Serum samples were collected and stored at -80°C for biochemical markers, and at -20°C for DNA analysis. Serum 25(OH)D was measured at baseline in 2878 subjects, with a competitive RIA (Diasorin, Stillwater, MN, USA; intra-assay CV 6%, inter-assay CV 15–16%) at a single laboratory. The inter-assay CV was 15–16% at all 25(OH)D levels [22]. The laboratory used participated in DEQAS quality controls. Phosphate, calcium and albumin were analyzed at respective hospitals department for clinical chemistry using standard methods. Albumin modified calcium was calculated with the formula calcium-(0.018(albumin-42)) [23]. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in ml/min/1.73 m2 was calculated from serum cystatin C (Cystatin C Immunoparticles, Dako A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) according to the formula 79.901*(Cyst C [mg/L])-1.4389 [24]. Intact PTH was measured by a second generation immunometric assay, Immulite 2000, (Los Angeles, USA). 25(OH)D levels were measured by Nichols Advantage automated assay system (San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA). Serum concentration of intact FGF23 was analyzed in using a two-site monoclonal antibody-based ELISA (Kainos Laboratories International; Tokyo, Japan).

BMD measurements

BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck was measured using DXA scanners: Lunar Prodigy DXA (GE Lunar Corp., Madison, WI, USA) in Malmö and Uppsala and Hologic QDR 4500/ A-Delphi (Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA) in Gothenburg. DXA measurements performed with equipment from different manufacturers were converted to a standardized BMD as previously described [25-27].

Fracture data

Study participants were followed up for a mean of 5.9 years (range 4.7–7.4) after the baseline examination. They received a one-page Tri-Annual Questionnaire every four months. This instrument was used to update contact information and to ascertain the incidence of falls and fractures and back pain. Time to first fracture or death was defined as time from the baseline study date to the actual event. Fracture evaluation during follow-up was in addition done by re-evaluation of X-ray in the regional registry, identified by the probands' unique personal registration number[20, 28]. The following fractures were regarded as osteoporotic: fractures of the pelvis, vertebrae, radius and humerus.

Other measurements

Height (in centimeters) and weight (in kilograms) were measured, and BMI was calculated as kilograms per square meter.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS program version 22 and SAS version 9.4. Differences between characteristics for the different SNPs were computed by ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc testing. p<0.05 were considered significant. Values are given as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Probability for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and major and minor allele frequencies were calculated using χ2 test for HW equilibrium for biallelic markers. Differences in relative fracture risk between alleles of tagging SNPs were compared by calculating chi-square. The analyses were done for osteoporotic fractures in all participants with data on genotype and fracture. No adjustments for covariates were made.

Results

Genotyping and serum 25(OH)D concentrations were available for 2870 participants. The mean age was 75.4 years (range 69–81), and mean BMI was 26.4. Height, weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) were all normally distributed. Overall, the participants were relatively vitamin D sufficient, and the mean level of 25(OH)D was 69.8 nmol/L. Only 0.9% had vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L), and 17% had vitamin D insufficiency (25–49 nmol/L). The incidence of self-reported diabetes was 9.5%. Characteristics of the study cohort, biochemical parameters and BMD are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Description of the study cohort (N = 2870).

CharacteristicsMeanSD
Age (years)75.43.2
Height (m)1.750.07
Weight (kg)80.812.1
BMI (kg/m2)26.43.6
Current smokers N (%)241 (8.4)
25(OH)D (nmol/L)69.823.8
Albumin correlated calcium (mmol/L)2.340.16
Phosphate (mmol/L)1.070.16
PTH (pmol/L)4.643.0
FGF23 (pg/mL)48.637.8
Albumin (g/L)43.13.6
Cystatin C (mg/L)1.140.30
Estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)72.020.6
Lumbar spine vertebra 1–4. standardized BMD (mg/cm2)1142.8202.2
Total hip, standardized BMD (mg/cm2), left hip948.7145.7
Femoral neck, standardized BMD (mg/cm2), left hip840.3132.7

Demographic data, biochemical parameters and bone mineral density at baseline.

Continuous data are shown as means with SD, and categorical data as numbers (percentages).

BMI = Body Mass Index, PTH = Parathyroid hormone, FGF23 = Fibroblast growth factor 23, GFR = Glomerular filtration rate, BMD = Bone Mineral Density.

Demographic data, biochemical parameters and bone mineral density at baseline. Continuous data are shown as means with SD, and categorical data as numbers (percentages). BMI = Body Mass Index, PTH = Parathyroid hormone, FGF23 = Fibroblast growth factor 23, GFR = Glomerular filtration rate, BMD = Bone Mineral Density.

Haplotype analysis

The eight preselected SNPs covered the regulatory region and the exonic and intronic regions of the CYP2R1 gene. Presence of the 6 most common haplotypes was found in 93.6% of the subjects (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Genetic structure of the CYP2R1 gene, with Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) plot for the eight analysed SNPs and definition of the six most common haplotypes of the CYP2R1 gene.

The location of each SNP is indicated on top and the number in each diamond indicates the magnitude of LD between respective pairs of SNPs. Empty squares represent perfect LD. The table below the diagram shows the SNP genotype combination defining the 6 most common haplotypes (1–6).

Genetic structure of the CYP2R1 gene, with Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) plot for the eight analysed SNPs and definition of the six most common haplotypes of the CYP2R1 gene.

The location of each SNP is indicated on top and the number in each diamond indicates the magnitude of LD between respective pairs of SNPs. Empty squares represent perfect LD. The table below the diagram shows the SNP genotype combination defining the 6 most common haplotypes (1–6). 25 OHD: Statistical analysis with ANOVA showed significant association (p < 0.05) between on one hand each of the haplotypes 1, 2, or 6, and on the other hand 25(OH)D levels. Analysis of all homozygotes and heterozygotes for these haplotypes showed higher 25(OH)D levels for homozygotes of haplotypes 1 and 2, but significantly lower levels for homozygotes or heterozygotes which included haplotype 6 (Table 2).
Table 2

Descriptive statistics: 25(OH)D-levels and BMD for the six most common haplotypes.

HaplotypeNNumbers of copies of haplotypeBMD (g/cm3)
25(OH)D (nmol/L)p-valueaLumbar spinep-valueTotal hipp-valueaFemoral neckp-valuea
11636071.1 (24.7)0.0011139.4 (200.2)0.296942.0 (143.1)836.8 (131.4)0.179
988168.2 (22.6)1145.0 (207.0)959.5 (150.1)0.013846.7 (135.6)
142265.6 (20.3)1165.7 (190.2)952.2 (141.0)836.7 (125.6)
21636069.4 (23.1)0.0021143.4 (202.4)0.733947.1 (144.4)838.1 (132.0)0.603
988169.1 (23.9)1140.0 (198.3)949.5 (143.8)0.762841.6 (130.0)
142274.6 (26.5)1150.4 (216.3)953.9 (159.4)846.4 (146.5
32340069.5 (23.6)0.1501145.1 (201.9)0.361950.6 (146.3)841.7 (133.2)0.322
412171.7 (25.1)1129.9 (205.2)938.3 (142.6)0.272833.0 (130.4)
14274.2 (22.6)1142.4 (142.7)932.9 (133.7)808.0 (104.9)
42071070.0 (24.1)0.6171145.0 (202.5)0.038951.7 (146.6)842.1 (133.7)0.142
628168.9 (22.6)1141.7 (200.2)943.3 (142.9)0.025837.4 (129.4)
87269.3 (25.1)1080.6 (204.8)905.8 (136.5)810.8 (128.9)
52476070.1 (23.8)0.0861143.8 (202.8)0.663948.8 (145.6)841.1 (132.3)0.068
278167.3 (23.9)1133.2 (197.8)944.8 (146.7)0.305829.9 (136.5)
12261.4 (19.9)1163.0 (167.9)1013.5 (135.9)916.0 (99.3)
62345069.2 (23.9)0.0051144.2 (202.9)0.353949.5 (145.9)840.2 (131.9)0.988
401172.1 (23.1)1137.2 (199.2)944.6 (145.5)0.783840.7 (138.5)
20282.3 (23.8)1086.0 (165.8)937.7 (131.5)836.1 (112.5)

25(OH)D, 25OH vitamin D; BMD bone mineral density. Mean values and standard deviations. N = 2870.

ap-values were calculated using ANOVA.

Other biochemical parameters: Analysis with ANOVA of the other biochemical parameters of calcium and phosphate homeostasis (PTH, Ca, FGF-23 and phosphate) showed no associations with regard to haplotype combination. (Table 2). 25(OH)D, 25OH vitamin D; BMD bone mineral density. Mean values and standard deviations. N = 2870. ap-values were calculated using ANOVA.

Laboratory markers

BMD

Multiple linear regression, with outcomes lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, femoral neck BMD analysed separately for each of the SNPs and HAPs, adjusted for age, showed significant associations (p<0.05) for the SNPs rs11023374 with total hip BMD and rs10832313 with femoral neck BMD, haplotype 4 with lumbar spine BMD and total hip BMD, and haplotype 1 with total hip BMD. (Table 3).
Table 3

Analysis of associations between SNPs/haplotype and bone mineral density, adjusted for age.

Outcomes: lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, femoral neck BMD analysed separately for each of the SNPs and HAPs.

Lumbar spine BMDTotal Hip BMDFemoral neck BMD
SNP / HAPLevelN%p-valueabeta estimatep-valueabeta estimatep-valueabeta estimate
rs10766197TT (ref)51818.530.97740.94170.9494
CC89832.12
CT138049.36
rs11023374GA (ref)106537.740.10690.0120.2538
A159856.630.0035-17.287756
G1595.630.7821-3.538543
rs10741657TT (ref)56019.640.77420.82430.9558
CC92232.34
CT136948.02
rs10832313TT (ref)244086.590.85940.25850.0437
CC160.570.020778.891876
CT36212.850.3768-6.742963
rs16930609TT (ref)235882.330.18470.70730.8131
GG260.91
GT48016.76
rs16930625TT (ref)236982.750.61780.8760.9887
CC280.98
CT46616.28
rs11023371CC (ref)231181.230.33710.28250.3812
CT51218
TT220.77
rs76936142TT (ref)249487.690.83160.38680.1272
AA150.53
TA33511.78
Haplotype 10 (ref)170959.550.29480.01060.1594
1101435.330.002717.749128
21475.120.420410.401654
Haplotype 20 (ref)147351.320.7370.81080.6514
1111638.89
22819.79
Haplotype 30 (ref)242984.630.35840.19920.2225
142714.88
2140.49
Haplotype 40 (ref)214774.810.03870.04060.2069
165422.790.7149-3.3134950.2457-7.736133
2692.40.0109-64.3227020.0192-42.694266
Haplotype 50 (ref)256889.480.66230.2690.0569
129010.1
2120.42
Haplotype 60 (ref)243784.910.35520.81610.9953
141214.36
2210.73

*P-values were calculated using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age. Type 3 p-values are displayed showing the strength of association between the outcome variable and the SNP/Hap. If Type 3 p-value was significant (<0.05), Pr>|t| are displayed to show the significance of difference to the reference level.

Analysis of associations between SNPs/haplotype and bone mineral density, adjusted for age.

Outcomes: lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, femoral neck BMD analysed separately for each of the SNPs and HAPs. *P-values were calculated using multiple linear regression, adjusted for age. Type 3 p-values are displayed showing the strength of association between the outcome variable and the SNP/Hap. If Type 3 p-value was significant (<0.05), Pr>|t| are displayed to show the significance of difference to the reference level. When subjects with self-reported diabetes (N = 274 were removed, significant associations were found between 25(OH)D and 4 of the haplotypes (1,2,3 or 6). Significant associations were still seen between haplotype 4 and BMD (lumbar spine and total hip) in non-diabetic subjects (p < 0.05). When analysing the SNPs separately by ANOVA, six of the eight SNPs were significantly associated with circulating levels of 25(OH)D (4.6–18.5% difference in mean values between SNP genotypes), but no correlations with circulating levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH or FGF23 for any of the SNPs were found. There was a slightly higher BMD (0.07–6.5% in the lumbar spine and 5.1–6.9% in the femoral neck) for two SNPs variants (rs11023374 and rs10832313), associated with lower circulating 25(OH)D levels. Interestingly, the higher BMD of the total hip (p = 0.013) found for rs11023374 variants was associated with lower 25(OH)D levels (Fig 2). Furthermore, a higher BMD of the femoral neck (p = 0.05) was seen for the CC allele of rs10832313. For the other SNPs, no significant differences in BMD were found between SNP genotypes, but there was a clear trend for all SNPs that lower 25(OH)D levels were associated with higher BMD values (Fig 2).
Fig 2

Variation in 25(OH)D concentrations and standardized BMD (SBMD) of the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip and femoral neck by CYP2R1 SNPs rs11023374 and rs10832313 genotypes.

Similar, although not significant, patterns (i.e. low 25(OH)D levels were associated with higher BMD) were seen for all SNPs. Values are presented as mean and SEM, with overall p-values by ANOVA.

Variation in 25(OH)D concentrations and standardized BMD (SBMD) of the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip and femoral neck by CYP2R1 SNPs rs11023374 and rs10832313 genotypes.

Similar, although not significant, patterns (i.e. low 25(OH)D levels were associated with higher BMD) were seen for all SNPs. Values are presented as mean and SEM, with overall p-values by ANOVA.

Fracture incidence

The overall incidence of osteoporotic fractures in the cohort up to five years of follow up was 438 (15.3%) (Table 4), No significant differences were found in osteoporotic fracture incidence between variants of CYP2R1 for any of the haplotypes nor SNPs.
Table 4

Incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

N = 2870.

LocalisationFrequencyPercent
Acetabulum50.2
Radius461.6
Lumbar vertebra782.7
Neck of femur802.8
Pubis160.6
Thoracic vertebra903.1
Humerus371.3
Tibia40.1
Thoracic spine220.8
Pertrochanteric541.9
Subtrochanteric60.2
Total43815.3

Incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

N = 2870.

Discussion

Our results show that genetic variation in six of the eight SNPs covering the CYP2R1 gene were associated to serum 25(OH)D levels but not to other markers for calcium-phosphate balance. These findings with respect to 25(OH)D levels are consistent with other studies on subjects of European ancestry [3, 13, 16], including a Danish study, showing that alleles GG/AA of the SNPS rs19741657 and rs10766197 haplotypes were related to lower 25(OH)D concentrations [14]. Our results are, however, contrary to studies of Chinese women where no significant associations were found. This could possibly be explained by gender or ethnic differences [29]. One might expect that the genetic variants associated with low vitamin D levels would be associated with elevated PTH levels, since vitamin D deficiency often causes secondary hyperparathyroidism, with elevated PTH levels. However, although CYP2R1 haplotype number 6 (GTAGCGGA) was found to be predictive of lower 25(OH)D concentrations in our study cohort, neither this haplotype nor any other variant was associated with levels of the other markers of calcium and phosphate homeostasis (Ca, PTH, FGF23 and phosphate), nor with bone mineral density. A possible explanation of this could be that these parameters are controlled by other mechanisms than only the levels of 25(OH)D. As to the other parameters of calcium and phosphate homeostasis, no previous studies have been published, according to our knowledge. An association was seen for one SNP (rs11023374) to BMD of the hip, and similar (although not significant) trends were seen for all the other SNPs for BMD in femoral neck and lumbar spine. Intriguingly, our results show that the SNP variants associated to low 25(OH)D levels were associated with higher BMD and vice versa, the tendency seen for all SNPs. Mechanistically, it could be possible that the action is conferred on the bone cellular level with local vitamin D conversion depending on the CYP2R1 genotype, rather than an effect on circulating levels of 25(OH)D. There have been no previous reports on association between CYP2R1 genetic variants and BMD or fractures. In a study of a cohort of 342 subjects in Austria, no association between the rs10741657 SNP and 5 years follow up of fracture incidence was found [3]. A strength of our study is that the cohort is one of the largest available male study cohorts in the world, homogenous with respect to genetic background, and that a similar pattern with regard to 25(OH)D and BMD was seen for several SNPs. A weakness of the study is that although the association between CYP2R1 variants and BMD is clear, a mechanistic explanation is currently lacking. Also, in this cohort of elderly Swedish men, presence of clinical vitamin D deficiency was rare, and these results might have been different for another population, with higher incidence of low 25(OH)D levels in the blood. Furthermore, our study does not include measurements of vitamin D binding protein.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that genetic variants of the CYP2R1 gene were correlated to levels of circulating 25(OH)D, but not to calcium, phosphate, PTH, nor FGF-23. The genetic variant associated with a concomitant inverse relationship between 25(OH)D and BMD needs further investigation. Presence of the one CYP2R1haplotype (GTAGCGGA) appears to be an indicator of risk for low 25(OH)D levels, but it remains to elucidate whether there could be any risks of severe deficiency.

Associations between serum parameters for 8 different SNPs in CYP2R1, presenting p-values by ANOVA.

N = 2870. SNP = Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, PTH = Parathyroid hormone, FGF23 = Fibroblast growth factor 23, GFR = Glomerular filtration rate. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  29 in total

1.  Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps.

Authors:  J C Barrett; B Fry; J Maller; M J Daly
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Endocrine functions of bone in mineral metabolism regulation.

Authors:  L Darryl Quarles
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Association of genetic variants of vit D binding protein (DBP/GC) and of the enzyme catalyzing its 25-hydroxylation (DCYP2R1) and serum vit D in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Jing Sun; Wenbo Wang; Xiran Wang; Yan Jiang; Wei Huang; Xin Zheng; Qiuping Wang; Zhiwei Ning; Yu Pei; Min Nie; Mei Li; Ou Wang; Xiaoping Xing; Wei Yu; Qiang Lin; Ling Xu; Weibo Xia
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study--a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men.

Authors:  Eric Orwoll; Janet Babich Blank; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Jane Cauley; Steven Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Cora Lewis; Peggy M Cawthon; Robert Marcus; Lynn M Marshall; Joan McGowan; Kathy Phipps; Sherry Sherman; Marcia L Stefanick; Katie Stone
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 5.  Genetic determinants of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stuart H Ralston
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 6.  Genetics of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tomohiko Urano; Satoshi Inoue
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle.

Authors:  Y Lu; T Fuerst; S Hui; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Genetic evidence that the human CYP2R1 enzyme is a key vitamin D 25-hydroxylase.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Cheng; Michael A Levine; Norman H Bell; David J Mangelsdorf; David W Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Vitamin D status: measurement, interpretation, and clinical application.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Genetically Low Vitamin D Levels, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone Metabolism Markers: a Mendelian Randomisation Study.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Li-Hong Gao; Xiao-Ya Zhang; Jin-We He; Wen-Zhen Fu; Yu-Juan Liu; Yun-Qiu Hu; Zhen-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of zoledronic acid on bone mineral density around prostheses and bone metabolism markers after primary total hip arthroplasty in females with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  W Zhou; Y Liu; X Guo; H Yang; Y Xu; D Geng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  DKK1 Induced by 1,25D3 Is Required for the Mineralization of Osteoblasts.

Authors:  Sungsin Jo; Subin Yoon; So Young Lee; So Yeon Kim; Hyosun Park; Jinil Han; Sung Hoon Choi; Joong-Soo Han; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Haplotypes in the GC, CYP2R1 and CYP24A1 Genes and Biomarkers of Bone Mineral Metabolism in Older Adults.

Authors:  Ana Fernández-Araque; Andrea Giaquinta-Aranda; Carmelo Moreno-Sainz; María Cruz Martínez-Martínez; Verónica Velasco-González; María Sainz-Gil; Luis H Martín-Arias; Silvia Carretero-Molinero; Miguel García-Hidalgo; Zoraida Verde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.