Literature DB >> 3055999

Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation.

B R Benacerraf1, R Gelman, F D Frigoletto.   

Abstract

To determine the accuracy of our ultrasonographically predicted birth weights we studied 1301 women delivered of infants within a week of an obstetric ultrasonogram to compare the ultrasonographically predicted birth weights with the actual birth weights. The fetuses varied from 700 to 5800 gm and were consecutive singleton fetuses in vertex presentations delivered at a single institution. Overall 74% of the infants had birth weights within 10% of the ultrasonographic estimates and 42% had birth weights within 5% of the ultrasonographic estimates. The presence of oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios made no difference in the percent errors. The sensitivity for identifying a fetus with macrosomia (birth weight greater than 4000 gm) with an estimated weight of greater than or equal to 4000 gm was 65%. The specificity or percent of fetuses correctly identified ultrasonographically as not macrosomic was 90%. If fetuses predicted by ultrasonography to be greater than 3800 gm were included, the sensitivity for the prediction of macrosomia rises to 82% but the specificity would be 79%. There appears to be a fixed limitation to obtaining estimated fetal weights by ultrasonography, even in large series, because these data reaffirm the success and limitations of other methods used to estimate fetal weight previously reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3055999     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90425-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term.

Authors:  Jan-Simon Lanowski; Gabriele Lanowski; Cordula Schippert; Kristina Drinkut; Peter Hillemanns; Ismini Staboulidou
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  The effects of maternal weight gain patterns on term birth weight in African-American women.

Authors:  Vinod K Misra; Calvin J Hobel; Charles F Sing
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-08

4.  Fetal weight estimation in tall women: is ultrasound more accurate than clinical assessment? A prospective trial.

Authors:  Yair Daykan; Maya Shavit; Yael Yagur; Hanoch Schreiber; Omer Weitzner; Ron Schonman; Tal Biron-Shental; Ofer Markovitch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Management of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Annunziata Lapolla; Maria Grazia Dalfrà; Domenico Fedele
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Identifying fetal growth disorders using ultrasound in obese nulliparous women.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; Berkley Davis; Katie Delaney; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-08-01

7.  Analysis of the effectiveness of ultrasound and clinical examination methods in fetal weight estimation for term pregnancies.

Authors:  Mehmet Zahran; Yusuf Aytaç Tohma; Salim Erkaya; Özlem Evliyaoğlu; Eser Çolak; Bora Çoşkun
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-15

8.  Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Akinola S Shittu; Oluwafemi Kuti; Ernest O Orji; Niyi O Makinde; Solomon O Ogunniy; Oluwagbemiga O Ayoola; Salami S Sule
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Authors:  Alexandros A Moraitis; Norman Shreeve; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Alexander E P Heazell; Jim G Thornton; Stephen C Robson; Aris Papageorghiou; Gordon C Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.