Literature DB >> 31340707

Identifying fetal growth disorders using ultrasound in obese nulliparous women.

Annie M Dude1, Berkley Davis2, Katie Delaney2, Lynn M Yee1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the ability of third trimester ultrasound to diagnose fetal growth disorders among obese women.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of obese nulliparous women who delivered term singleton neonates who had an ultrasound within 5 weeks of delivery. We characterized the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ultrasound to detect large-for-gestational age (LGA) and small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants. Antenatally, LGA and SGA were defined as an ultrasound estimated fetal weight >90% or <10% based on the Hadlock formula. Postnatally, LGA or SGA designation was based on gestational age-based birthweight percentiles. Test characteristics were analyzed for the total cohort and by class of obesity (class II, body mass index [BMI] = 35.0-39.9 kg/m2 versus class III, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). We compared the area under the curve for receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for different classes of obesity.
RESULTS: Of 690 women, 13 (1.9%) screened positive for SGA and 19 (2.8%) delivered an SGA neonate. In contrast, 158 (22.9%) screened positive for LGA and 97 (14.1%) delivered an LGA neonate. The sensitivity of ultrasound for SGA was 26.3% and the specificity was 98.8%. The sensitivity for LGA was 75.3% and the specificity was 85.7%. The ROC curves did not differ significantly for different classes of obesity (p = .69 for SGA, p = .75 for LGA).
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound in obese women who delivered term pregnancies has a high specificity but poor sensitivity for SGA and a low positive predictive value for LGA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Large for gestational age; obesity; pregnancy; small for gestational age; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31340707      PMCID: PMC6994320          DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1648420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  34 in total

1.  In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; J Martinez-Poyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Performance of the ultrasound examination in the early and late third trimester for the prediction of birth weight deviations.

Authors:  Athena P Souka; Ioannis Papastefanou; Athanasios Pilalis; Vasiliki Michalitsi; Perikles Panagopoulos; Dimitrios Kassanos
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.

Authors:  Melanie R L Meister; Alison G Cahill; Shayna N Conner; Candice L Woolfolk; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Sonographically estimated fetal weights: accuracy and limitation.

Authors:  B R Benacerraf; R Gelman; F D Frigoletto
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Estimate of fetal weight by ultrasound within two weeks of delivery in the detection of fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Amy M Phillips; Amy B Galdamez; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; Everett F Magann
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America.

Authors:  W E Brenner; D A Edelman; C H Hendricks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Sonography in obese and overweight pregnant women: clinical, medicolegal and technical issues.

Authors:  D Paladini
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference.

Authors:  Emily Oken; Ken P Kleinman; Janet Rich-Edwards; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ulla Sovio; Ian R White; Alison Dacey; Dharmintra Pasupathy; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.