Literature DB >> 28392581

Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term.

Jan-Simon Lanowski1, Gabriele Lanowski1, Cordula Schippert1, Kristina Drinkut1, Peter Hillemanns1, Ismini Staboulidou1.   

Abstract

Introduction At term, fetal weight estimation is an important factor for decisions about the delivery mode and the timing of labor induction. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of abdominal palpation with that of ultrasound performed by different examiners to estimate fetal weight. The study investigated whether differences in the examiners' training affected fetal weight estimates. The accuracy of the weight estimates made for fetuses with extreme birth weights was also evaluated. Finally, the accuracy of Johnson's method and of Insler and Bernstein's formula for estimating fetal weight were compared with the other two methods. Methods This prospective study included singleton pregnancies between 37 weeks of gestation and 12 days post-term planned for vaginal delivery or cesarean section. Ultrasound and abdominal palpation using Leopold's maneuvers were performed by examiners with different levels of professional experience. Fetal weight was additionally estimated using Insler and Bernstein's formula and Johnson's method. Statistical analysis calculated the accuracy of fetal weight estimates for the different examiners and the four methods. Results A total of 204 women were included in the analysis. Trained ultrasound examiners were most accurate when estimating fetal weight compared with all other examiners. The comparison of all four methods showed that fetal weight was assessed most accurately with ultrasound. No learning curve could be established. BMI and advanced gestational age affected the accuracy of the estimated weight. The analysis showed that a greater deviation between estimated weight and actual weight occurred with all four methods for fetuses at either end of the extremes of fetal weight, i.e., with very low or very high birth weights. Conclusion Fetal weight should be estimated using ultrasound. A good ultrasound training is essential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical examination; fetal weight estimation; ultrasound

Year:  2017        PMID: 28392581      PMCID: PMC5383430          DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-102406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  48 in total

1.  Clinical vs. sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  N W Hendrix; C S Grady; S P Chauhan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. The Vermont Oxford Network.

Authors:  I M Bernstein; J D Horbar; G J Badger; A Ohlsson; A Golan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Comparison of clinical versus ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.

Authors:  A Mehdizadeh; R Alaghehbandan; H Horsan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Effect of OB/GYN residents' fatigue and training level on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation.

Authors:  Zahi Ben-Aroya; David Segal; Amnon Hadar; Mordechai Hallak; Michael Friger; Miriam Katz; Moshe Mazor
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  The effect of body mass index on three methods of fetal weight estimation.

Authors:  Tom Farrell; Rob Holmes; Peter Stone
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Accuracy of ultrasound, clinical and maternal estimates of birth weight in term women.

Authors:  T Ashrafganjooei; T Naderi; B Eshrati; N Babapoor
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.628

7.  Multivariable evaluation of term birth weight: a comparison between ultrasound biometry and symphysis-fundal height.

Authors:  Alessandra Curti; Margherita Zanello; Irene De Maggio; Elisa Moro; Giuliana Simonazzi; Nicola Rizzo; Antonio Farina
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-11-14

8.  Clinical estimation of fetal weight: is accuracy acquired with professional experience?

Authors:  Ishai Levin; Ronni Gamzu; Vladimir Buchman; Avital Skornick Rapaport; David Pauzner; Joseph B Lessing; Benny Almog
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.587

9.  Accuracy and modifying factors for ultrasonographic determination of fetal weight at term.

Authors:  K T Shamley; M B Landon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Akinola S Shittu; Oluwafemi Kuti; Ernest O Orji; Niyi O Makinde; Solomon O Ogunniy; Oluwagbemiga O Ayoola; Salami S Sule
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influence of Foetal Macrosomia on the Neonatal and Maternal Birth Outcome.

Authors:  Tamara Margit Jutta Pahlitzsch; Laura Hanne; Wolfgang Henrich; Alexander Weichert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda.

Authors:  Senai Goitom Sereke; Richard Okello Omara; Felix Bongomin; Sarah Nakubulwa; Harriet Nalubega Kisembo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.