| Literature DB >> 30539003 |
Imene Fhoula1, Amel Rehaiem1, Afef Najjari1, Donatella Usai2, Abdellatif Boudabous1, Leonardo Antonio Sechi2, Ouzari Hadda-Imene1.
Abstract
The research and the selection of novel probiotic strains from novel niches are receiving increased attention on their proclaimed health benefits to both humans and animals. This study aimed to evaluate the functional properties of Weissella strains from arid land living-hosts and to select strains with cholesterol-lowering property in vitro and in vivo, for use as probiotics. They were assessed for acid and bile tolerance, antibiotic susceptibility, membrane properties, antibacterial activity, antiadhesive effect against pathogens to host cell lines, and cholesterol assimilation in vitro. Our results showed that the majority of strains revealed resistance to gastrointestinal conditions. All the strains were nonhemolytic and sensitive to most of the tested antibiotics. They also exhibited high rates of autoaggregation and some of them showed high coaggregation with selected pathogens and high adhesion ability to two different cell lines (Caco-2 and MIM/PPk). Particularly, W. halotolerans F99, from camel feces, presented a broad antibacterial spectrum against pathogens, reduced Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli adhesion to Caco-2 cells, and was found to reduce, in vitro, the cholesterol level by 49 %. Moreover, W. halotolerans F99 was evaluated for the carbohydrate utilization as well as the serum lipid metabolism effect in Wistar rats fed a high-cholesterol diet. W. halotolerans F99 showed an interesting growth on different plant-derivative oligosaccharides as sole carbon sources. Compared with rats fed a high-fat (HF) diet without Weissella administration, total serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides levels were significantly (p<0.001) reduced in W. halotolerans F99-treated HF rats, with no significant change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HDL-C levels. On the basis of these results, this is the first study to report that W. halotolerans F99, from camel feces, can be developed as cholesterol-reducing probiotic strain. Further studies may reveal their potential and possible biotechnological and probiotic applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30539003 PMCID: PMC6261067 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1654151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Origin and survival rate (%) of selected Weissella strains to low pH and different bile concentrations.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
| Plant ( | 61.63±0.20 | 64.46±0.01 | 82.9±0.03 |
|
| Camel feces | 53.28±0.13 | 76.26±0.10 | 50.96±0.01 |
|
| Camel feces | 68.89±0.17 | 77.80±0.03 | 85.16±0.01 |
|
| Camel feces | 74.24±0.12 | 78.78±0.03 | 96.28±0.05 |
|
| Ant gut | 89.29±0.03 | 72.00±0.25 | 54.65±0.02 |
|
| Ant gut | 60.20±0.09 | 29.86±0.34 | - |
|
| Ant gut | 69.97±0.18 | 73.96±0.05 | 56.33±0.02 |
|
| Ant gut | 44.45±0.14 | 75.33±0.05 | 50.23±0.09 |
|
| Ant gut | 72.10±0.11 | 68.00±0.80 | 42.60±1.10 |
|
| Dairy product | 85.42±0.01 | 89.14±0.03 | 75.60±0.02 |
W, Weissella; En., Enterococcus. Each value represents the mean value ±standard deviation (SD) from three trials. (-), No growth; (∗), Survival rate of bacterial cells successively treated in a low pH and high bile.
Figure 1Adhesion of (c) and (d), recognized as the cells without bacterial adhesion as a negative control.
Adherence of cells of Weissella strains to Caco-2 and MIM/PPk cell lines.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
| NA | +++ |
|
| +++ | ++ |
| W. | ++ | ++ |
| W. | +++ | +++ |
| W. | +++ | +++ |
(ǂ), NA: No significant adhesion (< 40); (+), weak adhesion, 40 ≤ Nb < 200); (++), Good adhesion (200 ≤ Nb <1000); (+++), strong adhesion (≥1000). Each value represents the mean value ±standard deviation (SD) from three trials. Adherence was evaluated in 20 random microscopic fields.
Percentage of autoaggregation and coaggregation of five selected Weissella strains.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 72.27±0.55 | 68.26±0.35 | 69.24±0.27 | 59.65±1.18 |
|
| 64.12±1.81 | 68.33±1.36 | 71.70±0.98 | 50.90±0.91 |
|
| 66.51±1.12 | 74.00±0.63 | 81.13±0.11 | 75.38±0.33 |
|
| 64.61±0.39 | 80.61±0.49 | 79.25±0.17 | 67.08±1.35 |
|
| 52.10±0.64 | 10.40±1.06 | 78.81±0.07 | 15.64±0.23 |
|
| 54.20±0.42 | 21.10±1.81 | 68.35±0.67 | 46.12±1.53 |
Each value represents the mean value standard deviation (SD) from three trials. Values are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Antibiotic susceptibility, hemolytic activity of selected Weissella strains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA (30 | E (15 | CH (30 | TE (30 | CL (15 | AM (10 | RA (5 | Activity | |
|
| 6±0 (R) | 36±2 (S) | 24±1 (S) | 14±0 (R) | 34±2 (S) | 27±2 (S) | 27±1 (S) |
|
|
| 6±0 (R) | 43±0 (S) | 30±1 (S) | 20±1 (S) | 38±2 (S) | 23±1 (S) | 33±2 (S) |
|
|
| 6±0 (R) | 25±0 (S) | 22±1 (S) | 14±0 (R) | 29±1 (S) | 25±1 (S) | 27±1 (S) |
|
|
| 6±0 (R) | 35±2 (S) | 25±1 (S) | 14±0 (R) | 18±0 (S) | 23±1 (S) | 20±0 (S) |
|
|
| 6±0 (R) | 37±1 (S) | 31±1 (S) | 22±0.5 (S) | 30±0 (S) | 23±0 (S) | 31±0 (S) |
|
S, sensitive; R, resistant; The numbers represent the diameter of zone of inhibition (mm).
The antibacterial activity of the selected Weissella strains against six pathogenic bacteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | 21±0.4 | 12±1 | 12.3±1.5 | 24.1±0.6 | 12.4±0.3 |
|
| - | - | 12±1.6 | - | - | - |
Numbers indicated the diameter of the inhibition zone in mm; each value represents the mean value standard deviation (SD) from three trials.
Figure 2Competitive and exclusion inhibition of adhesion of Asterisks indicate significant differences (∗ p < 0.001).
Figure 3Serum lipid levels of the control and treated groups after 8 weeks. Control group: high-fat diet; treated group: high-fat diet+ W. halotolerans F99 (WhF99). Each concentration is the mean ± standard deviation (n = 8). Asterisks indicate significant differences (∗ p < 0.001 vs. control).