Literature DB >> 30524097

Online adaption approaches for intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck patients based on cone beam CTs and Monte Carlo simulations.

P Botas1, J Kim, B Winey, H Paganetti.   

Abstract

To develop an online plan adaptation algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) based on fast Monte Carlo dose calculation and cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging. A cohort of ten head and neck cancer patients with an average of six CBCT scans were studied. To adapt the treatment plan to the new patient geometry, contours were propagated to the CBCTs with a vector field (VF) calculated with deformable image registration between the CT and the CBCTs. Within the adaptive planning algorithm, beamlets were shifted following the VF at their distal falloff and raytraced in the CBCT to adjust their energies, creating a geometrically adapted plan. Four geometric adaptation modes were studied: unconstrained geometric shifts (Free), isocenter shift (Iso), a range shifter (RS), or isocenter shift and range shifter (Iso-RS). After evaluation of the geometrical adaptation, the weights of a selected subset of beamlets were automatically tuned using MC-generated influence matrices to fulfill the original plan requirements. All beamlet calculations were done with a fast Monte Carlo running on a GPU (graphics processing unit). Geometrical adaptation alone only worked with small anatomy changes. The weight-tuned adaptation worked for every fraction, with the Free and Iso modes performing similarly and being superior than the two range shifters modes. The mean V95 and V107 were 99.4  ±  0.9 and 6.4%  ±  4.7% in the Free mode with weight tuning. The calculation time per fraction was ~5 min, but further task parallelization could reduce it to ~1-2 min for delivery adaptation right after patient setup. An online adaptation algorithm was developed that significantly improved the treatment quality for inter-fractional geometry changes. Clinical implementation of the algorithm would allow delivery adaptation right before treatment and thus allow planning margin reductions for IMPT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30524097     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf30b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

Review 1.  Myths and realities of range uncertainty.

Authors:  Antony John Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Improving Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy by Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Dan Nguyen; Yixun Xing; Ana Barragan Montero; Jan Schuemann; Haijiao Shang; Yuehu Pu; Steve Jiang
Journal:  Mach Learn Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-06

5.  Evaluation of CBCT scatter correction using deep convolutional neural networks for head and neck adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Arthur Lalonde; Brian Winey; Joost Verburg; Harald Paganetti; Gregory C Sharp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Comparison of weekly and daily online adaptation for head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Mislav Bobić; Arthur Lalonde; Gregory C Sharp; Clemens Grassberger; Joost M Verburg; Brian A Winey; Antony J Lomax; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Anatomic changes in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy: Comparison between robust optimization and online adaptation.

Authors:  Arthur Lalonde; Mislav Bobić; Brian Winey; Joost Verburg; Gregory C Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.901

8.  Onboard cone-beam CT-based replan evaluation for head and neck proton therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Stanforth; Liyong Lin; Jonathan J Beitler; James R Janopaul-Naylor; Chih-Wei Chang; Robert H Press; Sagar A Patel; Jennifer Zhao; Bree Eaton; Eduard E Schreibmann; James Jung; Duncan Bohannon; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang; Mark W McDonald; Jun Zhou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 9.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

10.  Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom.

Authors:  Richard Y Wu; Amy Y Liu; Tyler D Williamson; Jinzhong Yang; Paul G Wisdom; Xiaorong R Zhu; Steven J Frank; Clifton D Fuller; Gary B Gunn; Song Gao
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.