Literature DB >> 35965743

Improving Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy by Using Deep Learning.

Chao Wu1,2,3, Dan Nguyen1, Yixun Xing1, Ana Barragan Montero3,4, Jan Schuemann5, Haijiao Shang2,3, Yuehu Pu2, Steve Jiang1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Pencil beam (PB) dose calculation is fast but inaccurate due to the approximations when dealing with inhomogeneities. Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is the most accurate method but it is time consuming. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning model that can boost the accuracy of PB dose calculation to the level of MC dose by converting PB dose to MC dose for different tumor sites.
Methods: The proposed model uses the PB dose and CT image as inputs to generate the MC dose. We used 290 patients (90 head and neck, 93 liver, 75 prostate and 32 lung) to train, validate, and test the model. For each tumor site, we performed four numerical experiments to explore various combinations of training datasets.
Results: Training the model on data from all tumor sites together and using the dose distribution of each individual beam as input yielded the best performance for all four tumor sites. The average gamma passing rate (1mm/1%) between the converted and the MC dose was 92.8%, 92.7%, 89.7% and 99.6% for head and neck, liver, lung, and prostate test patients, respectively. The average dose conversion time for a single field was less than 4 seconds. The trained model can be adapted to new datasets through transfer learning. Conclusions: Our deep learning-based approach can quickly boost the accuracy of PB dose to that of MC dose. The developed model can be added to the clinical workflow of proton treatment planning to improve dose calculation accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Monte Carlo; Pencil beam; Proton dose calculation

Year:  2021        PMID: 35965743      PMCID: PMC9374098          DOI: 10.1088/2632-2153/abb6d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mach Learn Sci Technol        ISSN: 2632-2153


  36 in total

1.  A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.

Authors:  Jiasen Ma; Chris Beltran; Hok Seum Wan Chan Tseung; Michael G Herman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Technical Note: A feasibility study on deep learning-based radiotherapy dose calculation.

Authors:  Yixun Xing; Dan Nguyen; Weiguo Lu; Ming Yang; Steve Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  GPU-based high-performance computing for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Peter Ziegenhein; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Assessing the Clinical Impact of Approximations in Analytical Dose Calculations for Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Jan Schuemann; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Clemens Grassberger; Maryam Moteabbed; Chul Hee Min; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  GPU-based fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for proton therapy.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Jan Schümann; Harald Paganetti; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Fine-tuning Convolutional Neural Networks for Biomedical Image Analysis: Actively and Incrementally.

Authors:  Zongwei Zhou; Jae Shin; Lei Zhang; Suryakanth Gurudu; Michael Gotway; Jianming Liang
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit       Date:  2017-11-09

8.  Automatic treatment planning based on three-dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique.

Authors:  Jiawei Fan; Jiazhou Wang; Zhi Chen; Chaosu Hu; Zhen Zhang; Weigang Hu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?

Authors:  Suliana Teoh; Francesca Fiorini; Ben George; Katherine A Vallis; Frank Van den Heuvel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Fast Pencil Beam Dose Calculation for Proton Therapy Using a Double-Gaussian Beam Model.

Authors:  Joakim da Silva; Richard Ansorge; Rajesh Jena
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.