Literature DB >> 30514768

A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Darshil R Patel1, Robert S Weiss2.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells continuously experience DNA damage that can perturb key molecular processes like DNA replication. DNA replication forks that encounter DNA lesions typically slow and may stall, which can lead to highly detrimental fork collapse if appropriate protective measures are not executed. Stabilization and protection of stalled replication forks ensures the possibility of effective fork restart and prevents genomic instability. Recent efforts from multiple laboratories have highlighted several proteins involved in replication fork remodeling and DNA damage response pathways as key regulators of fork stability. Homologous recombination factors such as RAD51, BRCA1, and BRCA2, along with components of the Fanconi Anemia pathway, are now known to be crucial for stabilizing stalled replication forks and preventing nascent strand degradation. Several checkpoint proteins have additionally been implicated in fork protection. Ongoing work in this area continues to shed light on a sophisticated molecular pathway that balances the action of DNA resection and fork protection to maintain genomic integrity, with important implications for the fate of both normal and malignant cells following replication stress.
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; DNA replication; genomic instability; homologous recombination; replication fork

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30514768      PMCID: PMC6487187          DOI: 10.1042/BST20180308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans        ISSN: 0300-5127            Impact factor:   5.407


  73 in total

Review 1.  Cellular DNA replicases: components and dynamics at the replication fork.

Authors:  Aaron Johnson; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Increased common fragile site expression, cell proliferation defects, and apoptosis following conditional inactivation of mouse Hus1 in primary cultured cells.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Genome maintenance defects in cultured cells and mice following partial inactivation of the essential cell cycle checkpoint gene Hus1.

Authors:  Peter S Levitt; Min Zhu; Amy Cassano; Stephanie A Yazinski; Houchun Liu; Joshua Darfler; Rachel M Peters; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The effect of Hus1 on ionizing radiation sensitivity is associated with homologous recombination repair but is independent of nonhomologous end-joining.

Authors:  X Wang; B Hu; R S Weiss; Y Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1.

Authors:  H Zhao; H Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Inactivation of mouse Hus1 results in genomic instability and impaired responses to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  R S Weiss; T Enoch; P Leder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Kristina Trenz; Eloise Smith; Sarah Smith; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1.

Authors:  Sinny Delacroix; Jill M Wagner; Masahiko Kobayashi; Ken-ichi Yamamoto; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

Authors:  José M Sogo; Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M Lopes; C Cotta-Ramusino; A Pellicioli; G Liberi; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; C S Newlon; M Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Structure of the FA core ubiquitin ligase closing the ID clamp on DNA.

Authors:  Shengliu Wang; Renjing Wang; Christopher Peralta; Ayat Yaseen; Nikola P Pavletich
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 2.  Germline genome protection: implications for gamete quality and germ cell tumorigenesis.

Authors:  J C Bloom; A R Loehr; J C Schimenti; R S Weiss
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  Pif1, RPA, and FEN1 modulate the ability of DNA polymerase δ to overcome protein barriers during DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Melanie A Sparks; Peter M Burgers; Roberto Galletto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years.

Authors:  Michael Charles Lanz; Diego Dibitetto; Marcus Bustamante Smolka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  DNA Damage and Associated DNA Repair Defects in Disease and Premature Aging.

Authors:  Vinod Tiwari; David M Wilson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Intertwined: SAMHD1 cellular functions, restriction, and viral evasion strategies.

Authors:  Catharina Majer; Jan Moritz Schüssler; Renate König
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 4.148

Review 7.  Resolving DNA Damage: Epigenetic Regulation of DNA Repair.

Authors:  Panagiotis Karakaidos; Dimitris Karagiannis; Theodoros Rampias
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Palindromes in DNA-A Risk for Genome Stability and Implications in Cancer.

Authors:  Marina Svetec Miklenić; Ivan Krešimir Svetec
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Replication Stress and Consequential Instability of the Genome and Epigenome.

Authors:  Pawlos S Tsegay; Yanhao Lai; Yuan Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Origin of Genome Instability and Determinants of Mutational Landscape in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Sonam Mehrotra; Indraneel Mittra
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.