Literature DB >> 33451142

Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses.

Siu Kei David Mak1, Dino Accoto2.   

Abstract

Osteoporotic spine fractures (OSF) are common sequelae of osteoporosis. OSF are directly correlated with increasing age and incidence of osteoporosis. OSF are treated conservatively or surgically. Associated acute pain, chronic disabilities, and progressive deformities are well documented. Conservative measures include a combination of initial bed rest, analgesia, early physiotherapy, and a spinal brace (orthosis), with the aim for early rehabilitation to prevent complications of immobile state. Spinal bracing is commonly used for symptomatic management of OSF. While traditional spinal braces aim to maintain the neutral spinal alignment and reduce the axial loading on the fractured vertebrae, they are well known for complications including discomfort with reduced compliance, atrophy of paraspinal muscles, and restriction of chest expansion leading to chest infections. Exoskeletons have been developed to passively assist and actively augment human movements with different types of actuators. Flexible, versatile spinal exoskeletons are designed to better support the spine. As new technologies enable the development of motorized wearable exoskeletons, several types have been introduced into the medical field application. We have provided a thorough review of the current spinal robotic technologies in this paper. The shortcomings in the current spinal exoskeletons were identified. Their limitations on the use for patients with OSF with potential improvement strategies were discussed. With our current knowledge of spinal orthosis for conservatively managed OSF, a semi-rigid backpack style thoracolumbar spinal robotic orthosis will reduce spinal bone stress and improve back muscle support. This will lead to back pain reduction, improved posture, and overall mobility. Early mobilization is an important part of management of patients with OSF as it reduces the chance of developing complications related to their immobile state for patients with OSF, which will be helpful for their recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active orthosis; exoskeleton; osteoporotic spine fracture; spinal orthosis; wearable robotics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33451142      PMCID: PMC7828606          DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9010070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  51 in total

1.  Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting.

Authors:  J P Callaghan; S M McGill
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Effects of varying backpack loads on peak forces in the lumbosacral spine during walking.

Authors:  J-H Goh; A Thambyah; K Bose
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Conservative care for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Heidi Prather; Devyani Hunt; John O Watson; Louis A Gilula
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  The personal lift-assist device and lifting technique: a principal component analysis.

Authors:  Erin M Sadler; Ryan B Graham; Joan M Stevenson
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Flexible sliding frame for gait enhancing mechatronic system (GEMS).

Authors: 
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

6.  Effect of a personal weight transfer device on muscle activities and joint flexions in the stooped posture.

Authors:  Brent L Ulrey; Fadi A Fathallah
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks.

Authors:  Kirsten Huysamen; Michiel de Looze; Tim Bosch; Jesus Ortiz; Stefano Toxiri; Leonard W O'Sullivan
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Impact of incident vertebral fractures on health related quality of life (HRQOL) in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Anna M Oleksik; Susan Ewing; Wei Shen; Natasja M van Schoor; Paul Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.

Authors:  Hyun-Kyung Kim; Yanxin Zhang
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Back extensor strength and lumbar spinal mobility are predictors of quality of life in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  N Miyakoshi; M Hongo; S Maekawa; Y Ishikawa; Y Shimada; E Itoi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.