Literature DB >> 33855778

A semiparametric modeling approach for analyzing clinical biomarkers restricted to limits of detection.

Sandipan Dutta1, Susan Halabi2.   

Abstract

Before biomarkers can be used in clinical trials or patients' management, the laboratory assays that measure their levels have to go through development and analytical validation. One of the most critical performance metrics for validation of any assay is related to the minimum amount of values that can be detected and any value below this limit is referred to as below the limit of detection (LOD). Most of the existing approaches that model such biomarkers, restricted by LOD, are parametric in nature. These parametric models, however, heavily depend on the distributional assumptions, and can result in loss of precision under the model or the distributional misspecifications. Using an example from a prostate cancer clinical trial, we show how a critical relationship between serum androgen biomarker and a prognostic factor of overall survival is completely missed by the widely used parametric Tobit model. Motivated by this example, we implement a semiparametric approach, through a pseudo-value technique, that effectively captures the important relationship between the LOD restricted serum androgen and the prognostic factor. Our simulations show that the pseudo-value based semiparametric model outperforms a commonly used parametric model for modeling below LOD biomarkers by having lower mean square errors of estimation.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; censored regression; limit of detection; pseudo-value; semi-parametric model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33855778      PMCID: PMC8514582          DOI: 10.1002/pst.2125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  19 in total

1.  The limitations due to exposure detection limits for regression models.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler; Brian W Whitcomb; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Regression models for the mean of the quality-of-life-adjusted restricted survival time using pseudo-observations.

Authors:  Adin-Cristian Andrei; Susan Murray
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  On pseudo-values for regression analysis in competing risks models.

Authors:  Frederik Graw; Thomas A Gerds; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 4.  Clinical review 24: Androgens in the aging male.

Authors:  A Vermeulen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation.

Authors:  David A Armbruster; Terry Pry
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2008-08

6.  A mixture model with detection limits for regression analyses of antibody response to vaccine.

Authors:  L H Moulton; N A Halsey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Richard Frank; Richard Hargreaves
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Comparison of models for analyzing two-group, cross-sectional data with a Gaussian outcome subject to a detection limit.

Authors:  Ryan E Wiegand; Charles E Rose; John M Karon
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Natural interpretations in Tobit regression models using marginal estimation methods.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Michael E Griswold
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Evaluation of regression methods when immunological measurements are constrained by detection limits.

Authors:  Hae-Won Uh; Franca C Hartgers; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.