Literature DB >> 30511232

Using Rescorla's truly random control condition to measure truly exogenous covert orienting.

Mohammad Habibnezhad1, Michael A Lawrence1, Raymond M Klein2.   

Abstract

Studies of exogenous covert orienting use peripheral cues (stimuli) that are spatially uninformative about the locations of subsequent targets. When the time course of the cue's influence on performance is explored (by varying the cue target onset asynchrony; CTOA), a biphasic pattern is usually seen with better performance at the cued location when the CTOA is short (typically attributed to attentional capture) and worse performance at the cued location when the CTOA is long (attributed to inhibition of return). However, while spatially uninformative, these cues (even when a nonaging foreperiod is used) entail a temporal contingency with the subsequent target. Consequently, this so-called capture may reflect an unintended consequence of endogenous allocation of temporal attention. Following Lawrence and Klein (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 560-572, 2013) we used Rescorla's (Psychological Review, 74, 71-80, 1967) truly random control condition to ensure that the spatially uninformative peripheral stimuli were temporally completely uninformative. Even such completely uninformative peripheral stimuli generated the prototypical biphasic pattern.

Keywords:  Attentional capture; Inhibition of return; Spatial attention; Temporal uncertainty; Uninformative cueing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30511232     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1544-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Associative changes with a random CS-US relationship.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2000-11

2.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  C L Folk; R W Remington; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Stimulus-response probability and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jason Ivanoff; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

5.  Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupiáñez; Martha Roberts; Biljana Stevanovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

7.  A Simon effect in pigeons.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-02

8.  Is inhibition of return a reflexive effect?

Authors:  Christine Tipper; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

9.  Parametric exploration of the Simon effect across visual space.

Authors:  Raymond M Klein; Mary E Dove; Jason Ivanoff; Gail A Eskes
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2006-06

10.  Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Joseph B Hopfinger; Vicki M West
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.