Literature DB >> 30509988

Noninvasive diagnostic imaging using machine-learning analysis of nanoresolution images of cell surfaces: Detection of bladder cancer.

I Sokolov1,2,3, M E Dokukin4, V Kalaparthi4, M Miljkovic4, A Wang4, J D Seigne5, P Grivas6, E Demidenko7.   

Abstract

We report an approach in diagnostic imaging based on nanoscale-resolution scanning of surfaces of cells collected from body fluids using a recent modality of atomic force microscopy (AFM), subresonance tapping, and machine-leaning analysis. The surface parameters, which are typically used in engineering to describe surfaces, are used to classify cells. The method is applied to the detection of bladder cancer, which is one of the most common human malignancies and the most expensive cancer to treat. The frequent visual examinations of bladder (cytoscopy) required for follow-up are not only uncomfortable for the patient but a serious cost for the health care system. Our method addresses an unmet need in noninvasive and accurate detection of bladder cancer, which may eliminate unnecessary and expensive cystoscopies. The method, which evaluates cells collected from urine, shows 94% diagnostic accuracy when examining five cells per patient's urine sample. It is a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in diagnostic accuracy compared with the currently used clinical standard, cystoscopy, as verified on 43 control and 25 bladder cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atomic force microscopy; cancer diagnostics; diagnostic imaging; machine learning; noninvasive methods

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30509988      PMCID: PMC6304950          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816459115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay.

Authors:  H Barton Grossman; Edward Messing; Mark Soloway; Kevin Tomera; Giora Katz; Yitzhak Berger; Yu Shen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Maarten P Tabor; J Alain Kummer; C René Leemans; Ruud H Brakenhoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Can sensitivity of voided urinary cytology or bladder wash cytology be improved by the use of different urinary portions?

Authors:  N A Mungan; S Kulacoglu; M Basar; M Sahin; J A Witjes
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Understanding the development of human bladder cancer by using a whole-organ genomic mapping strategy.

Authors:  Tadeusz Majewski; Sangkyou Lee; Joon Jeong; Dong-Sup Yoon; Andrzej Kram; Mi-Sook Kim; Tomasz Tuziak; Jolanta Bondaruk; Sooyong Lee; Weon-Seo Park; Kuang S Tang; Woonbok Chung; Lanlan Shen; Saira S Ahmed; Dennis A Johnston; H Barton Grossman; Colin P Dinney; Jain-Hua Zhou; R Alan Harris; Carrie Snyder; Slawomir Filipek; Steven A Narod; Patrice Watson; Henry T Lynch; Adi Gazdar; Menashe Bar-Eli; Xifeng F Wu; David J McConkey; Keith Baggerly; Jean-Pierre Issa; William F Benedict; Steven E Scherer; Bogdan Czerniak
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Voided urinary cytology in bladder cancer: is it time to review the indications?

Authors:  Raghav Talwar; Tapan Sinha; S C Karan; D Doddamani; A Sandhu; G S Sethi; A Srivastava; V Narang; A Agarwal; N Adhlakha
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Four-dimensional elastic light-scattering fingerprints as preneoplastic markers in the rat model of colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Yang Liu; Ramesh K Wali; Young L Kim; Alexei K Kromine; Michael J Goldberg; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Institutional variability in the accuracy of urinary cytology for predicting recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; Serge Benayoun; Craig Zippe; Gerson Lüdecke; Hans Boman; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Roberto Casella; Christine Mian; Martin G Friedrich; Sanaa Eissa; Hideyuki Akaza; Hartwig Huland; Hans Hedelin; Raina Rupesh; Naoto Miyanaga; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Michael J Marberger; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Cross; Yu-Sheng Jin; Jianyu Rao; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An interobserver multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Mika-P Raitanen; Risto Aine; Erkki Rintala; Jukka Kallio; Pertti Rajala; Harri Juusela; Teuvo L J Tammela
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells.

Authors:  S Iyer; R M Gaikwad; V Subba-Rao; C D Woodworth; Igor Sokolov
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  11 in total

1.  Difference in biophysical properties of cancer-initiating cells in melanoma mutated zebrafish.

Authors:  N Makarova; Vivek Kalaparthi; Andrew Wang; Chris Williams; M E Dokukin; Charles K Kaufman; Leonard Zon; I Sokolov
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-04-08

Review 2.  Current and future applications of machine and deep learning in urology: a review of the literature on urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, and bladder and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Simon Hein; Gerd Reis; Christian Gratzke; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Integrated analysis of quantitative proteome and transcriptional profiles reveals abnormal gene expression and signal pathway in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Songbai Liao; Minglin Ou; Liusheng Lai; Hua Lin; Yaoshuang Zou; Yonggang Yu; Xuede Li; Yong Dai; Weiguo Sui
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.839

4.  The biophysics of cancer: emerging insights from micro- and nanoscale tools.

Authors:  Peter E Beshay; Marcos G Cortes-Medina; Miles M Menyhert; Jonathan W Song
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 5.  Causal contributors to tissue stiffness and clinical relevance in urology.

Authors:  Laura Martinez-Vidal; Valentina Murdica; Chiara Venegoni; Filippo Pederzoli; Marco Bandini; Andrea Necchi; Andrea Salonia; Massimo Alfano
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-08-26

6.  Acceleration of imaging in atomic force microscopy working in sub-resonance tapping mode.

Authors:  Piers Echols-Jones; William Messner; Igor Sokolov
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 7.  A healthy dose of chaos: Using fractal frameworks for engineering higher-fidelity biomedical systems.

Authors:  Anastasia Korolj; Hau-Tieng Wu; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Potential of infrared microscopy to differentiate between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's diseases using peripheral blood samples and machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Ahmad Salman; Itshak Lapidot; Elad Shufan; Adam H Agbaria; Bat-Sheva Porat Katz; Shaul Mordechai
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 9.  Nanomechanics in Monitoring the Effectiveness of Drugs Targeting the Cancer Cell Cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Andrzej Kubiak; Tomasz Zieliński; Joanna Pabijan; Małgorzata Lekka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Locating critical events in AFM force measurements by means of one-dimensional convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Javier Sotres; Hannah Boyd; Juan F Gonzalez-Martinez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.