Literature DB >> 15713770

Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay.

H Barton Grossman1, Edward Messing, Mark Soloway, Kevin Tomera, Giora Katz, Yitzhak Berger, Yu Shen.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A combination of methods is used for diagnosis of bladder cancer because no single procedure detects all malignancies. Urine tests are frequently part of an evaluation, but have either been nonspecific for cancer or required specialized analysis at a laboratory.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a point-of-care proteomic test that measures the nuclear matrix protein NMP22 in voided urine could enhance detection of malignancy in patients with risk factors or symptoms of bladder cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Twenty-three academic, private practice, and veterans' facilities in 10 states prospectively enrolled consecutive patients from September 2001 to May 2002. Participants included 1331 patients at elevated risk for bladder cancer due to factors such as history of smoking or symptoms including hematuria and dysuria. Patients at risk for malignancy of the urinary tract provided a voided urine sample for analysis of NMP22 protein and cytology prior to cystoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The diagnosis of bladder cancer, based on cystoscopy with biopsy, was accepted as the reference standard. The performance of the NMP22 test was compared with voided urine cytology as an aid to cancer detection. Testing for the NMP22 tumor marker was conducted in a blinded manner.
RESULTS: Bladder cancer was diagnosed in 79 patients. The NMP22 assay was positive in 44 of 79 patients with cancer (sensitivity, 55.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 44.1%-66.7%), whereas cytology test results were positive in 12 of 76 patients (sensitivity, 15.8%; 95% CI, 7.6%-24.0%). The specificity of the NMP22 assay was 85.7% (95% CI, 83.8%-87.6%) compared with 99.2% (95% CI, 98.7%-99.7%) for cytology. The proteomic marker detected 4 cancers that were not visualized during initial endoscopy, including 3 that were muscle invasive and 1 carcinoma in situ.
CONCLUSION: The noninvasive point-of-care assay for elevated urinary NMP22 protein can increase the accuracy of cystoscopy, with test results available during the patient visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15713770     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.7.810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  78 in total

1.  Noninvasive diagnostic imaging using machine-learning analysis of nanoresolution images of cell surfaces: Detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  I Sokolov; M E Dokukin; V Kalaparthi; M Miljkovic; A Wang; J D Seigne; P Grivas; E Demidenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Urine collection and processing for protein biomarker discovery and quantification.

Authors:  C Eric Thomas; Wade Sexton; Kaaron Benson; Rebecca Sutphen; John Koomen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  High-throughput antibody-based assays to identify and quantify radiation-responsive protein biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael A Partridge; Yunfei Chai; Hongning Zhou; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Interleukin-8 (IL-8) over-production and autocrine cell activation are key factors in monomethylarsonous acid [MMA(III)]-induced malignant transformation of urothelial cells.

Authors:  C Escudero-Lourdes; T Wu; J M Camarillo; A J Gandolfi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Screening for bladder cancer with urinary tumor markers in chemical workers with exposure to aromatic amines.

Authors:  Beate Pesch; Dirk Taeger; Georg Johnen; Katarzyna Gawrych; Nadine Bonberg; Christian Schwentner; Harald Wellhäusser; Matthias Kluckert; Gabriele Leng; Michael Nasterlack; Yair Lotan; Arnulf Stenzl; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  NMP22 is predictive of recurrence in high-risk superficial bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Paul Lau; Joseph L Chin; Stephen Pautler; Hassan Razvi; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Clinical significance of urine heparanase in bladder cancer progression.

Authors:  Itay Shafat; Dov Pode; Tamar Peretz; Neta Ilan; Israel Vlodavsky; Benjamin Nisman
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  Usefulness of the NMP22BladderChek Test for Screening and Follow-up of Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Hwa Sub Choi; Sang Ik Lee; Dong Jun Kim; Tae Yoong Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-02-18

9.  Bladder cancer in cancer patients: population-based estimates from a large Swedish study.

Authors:  J Lorenzo Bermejo; J Sundquist; K Hemminki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Which urine marker test provides more diagnostic value in conjunction with standard cytology- ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ or Cytokeratin 20 expression.

Authors:  Isin Soyuer; Mustafa Sofikerim; Fatma Tokat; Serdar Soyuer; Figen Ozturk
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.