| Literature DB >> 25886599 |
Virgile Gnanguenon1,2, Fiacre R Agossa3,4, Kefilath Badirou5,6, Renaud Govoetchan7,8, Rodrigue Anagonou9,10, Fredéric Oke-Agbo11, Roseric Azondekon12, Ramziath AgbanrinYoussouf13,14, Roseline Attolou15,16, Filemon T Tokponnon17, Rock Aïkpon18,19, Razaki Ossè20,21, Martin C Akogbeto22,23.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insecticides are widely used to control malaria vectors and have significantly contributed to the reduction of malaria-caused mortality. In addition, the same classes of insecticides were widely introduced and used in agriculture in Benin since 1980s. These factors probably contributed to the selection of insecticide resistance in malaria vector populations reported in several localities in Benin. This insecticide resistance represents a threat to vector control tool and should be monitored. The present study reveals observed insecticide resistance trends in Benin to help for a better management of insecticide resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25886599 PMCID: PMC4395909 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0833-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Study sites.
Figure 2Knock-down rates of mosquitoes due to exposure to Deltamethrin.
Figure 3Observed mortalities with Deltamethrin.
Figure 4Immediate mortalities observed during mosquitoes exposure to Bendiocarb.
Figure 5Observed mortalities with Bendiocarb.
Figure 6Immediate mortalities observed during mosquitoes exposure to Pyrimiphos methyl.
Figure 7Mortalities observed with Pyrimiphos methyl.
Observed Knock-down rate and mortality with Fenitrothion
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 86 | 0[0,00-4,28] | 0[0,00-4,28] | 0[0,00-4,28] | 0[0,00-4,28] | 24[16,56-34,46] | 100 |
|
| 99 | 0[0,00-3,74] | 0[0,00-3,74] | 1,01[0,18-5,5] | 3[1,04-8,53] | 23[16,01-32,46] | 100 |
|
| 90 | 0[0,00-3,70] | 1[0,18-5,45] | 1[0,18-5,45] | 23[15,84-32,15] | 61[69,98-51,2] | 100 |
|
| 82 | 0[0,00-4,48] | 2[0,67-8,46] | 2[0,67-8,46] | 26[17,4-36] | 76[65,31-83,62] | 100 |
|
| 100 | 0[0,00-3,70] | 0[0,00-3,70] | 0[0,00-3,70] | 0[0,00-3,70] | 44[34,67-53,77] | 100 |
|
| 95 | 0[0,00-3,89] | 0[0,00-3,89] | 0[0,00-3,89] | 0[0,00-3,89] | 0[0,00-03,89] | 100 |
|
| 93 | 0[0,00-3,97] | 0[0,00-3,97] | 0[0,00-3,97] | 0[0,00-3,97] | 0[0,00-03,97] | 100 |
|
| 98 | 0[0,00-3,77] | 82[72,83-88,05] | 100[96,23-100] | 100[96,23-100] | 100[96,23-100] | 100 |
min = minutes.
Figure 8Distribution map of insecticides resistance in Benin.
Distribution of Knock-down resistance (Kdr) frequencies between malaria vectors and sites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allada |
| 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0,89a | 1.00 | - |
|
| 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0,86a | 1.39 [0.20-9.44] | 1.000 | |
|
| 20 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 0,83a | 1.77 [0.41-7.53] | 0.5072 | |
| Dassa |
| 21 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0,90a | 1.00 | - |
|
| 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0,81a | 2.19 [0.43-11.12] | 0.381 | |
|
| 18 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0,92a | 0.86 [0.18-4.14] | 1.00 | |
| Parakou |
| 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0,93a | 1.00 | - |
|
| 19 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0,89a | 1.65 [0.28-9.67] | 0.6870 | |
|
| 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0,86a | 2.33 [0.39-13.87] | 0.4154 | |
| Kandi |
| 22 | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0,86a | 1.00 | - |
|
| 14 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0,93a | 0.49 [0.09-2.60] | 0.4705 | |
|
| 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0,96a | 0.27 [0.03-2.43] | 0.4073 | |
| Malanville |
| 18 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0,89a | 1.00 | - |
|
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0,83a | 1.6 [0.15-17.38] | 0.5568 | |
|
| 27 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 0,83a | 1.6 [0.45-5.65] | 0.55141 | |
| Ouidah |
| 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0,78a | 1.00 | - |
|
| 27 | 19 | 8 | 0 | 0,85a | 0.61 [0.16-2.33] | 0.47922 | |
|
| 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0,86a | 0.55 [0.11-2.87] | 0.67983 |
SS = homozygous susceptible; RS = hybrid resistant and susceptible; RR = homozygous resistant, F = Frequency.
Distribution of Ace-1R frequency between species
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allada |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | P > 0.999 |
|
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | ||
|
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | ||
| Dassa |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0 | P > 0.999 |
|
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | ||
|
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | ||
| Parakou |
| 15 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 0.1 | 0,22 |
|
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | ||
|
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | ||
| Kandi |
| 22 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 0.002 | P > 0.999 |
|
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | ||
|
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | ||
| Malanville |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | P > 0.999 |
|
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | ||
|
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ouidah |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | P > 0.999 |
|
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | ||
|
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
SS = homozygous susceptible; RS = hybrid resistant and susceptible; RR = homozygous resistant.
Figure 9Mono-oxygenase activities in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato collected.
Figure 10α-esterases activities in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato collected.
Figure 11β-esterases activities in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato collected.
Figure 12Glutathion-S-transferase activities in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato collected.
Figure 13Distribution of resistance mechanism in Benin.