Literature DB >> 30508424

Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity.

Alvin Rajkomar1, Michaela Hardt2, Michael D Howell2, Greg Corrado2, Marshall H Chin3.   

Abstract

Machine learning is used increasingly in clinical care to improve diagnosis, treatment selection, and health system efficiency. Because machine-learning models learn from historically collected data, populations that have experienced human and structural biases in the past-called protected groups-are vulnerable to harm by incorrect predictions or withholding of resources. This article describes how model design, biases in data, and the interactions of model predictions with clinicians and patients may exacerbate health care disparities. Rather than simply guarding against these harms passively, machine-learning systems should be used proactively to advance health equity. For that goal to be achieved, principles of distributive justice must be incorporated into model design, deployment, and evaluation. The article describes several technical implementations of distributive justice-specifically those that ensure equality in patient outcomes, performance, and resource allocation-and guides clinicians as to when they should prioritize each principle. Machine learning is providing increasingly sophisticated decision support and population-level monitoring, and it should encode principles of justice to ensure that models benefit all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30508424      PMCID: PMC6594166          DOI: 10.7326/M18-1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  29 in total

1.  Inclusion of Demographic-Specific Information in Studies Supporting US Food & Drug Administration Approval of High-Risk Medical Devices.

Authors:  Sanket S Dhruva; Carolyn M Mazure; Joseph S Ross; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments.

Authors:  Alexandra Chouldechova
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality.

Authors:  Tiffany C Veinot; Hannah Mitchell; Jessica S Ancker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care.

Authors:  Andrew L Beam; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The association of patients' socioeconomic characteristics with the length of hospital stay and hospital charges within diagnosis-related groups.

Authors:  A M Epstein; R S Stern; J Tognetti; C B Begg; R M Hartley; E Cumella; J Z Ayanian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients.

Authors:  David W Bates; Suchi Saria; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Anand Shah; Gabriel Escobar
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 9.  How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.

Authors:  Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 10.  Automation bias and verification complexity: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Lyell; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  99 in total

1.  Health informatics and health equity: improving our reach and impact.

Authors:  Tiffany C Veinot; Jessica S Ancker; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Structural Racism: The Rules and Relations of Inequity.

Authors:  Gilbert C Gee; Margaret T Hicken
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 1.847

Review 3.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare.

Authors:  Davide Cirillo; Silvina Catuara-Solarz; Czuee Morey; Emre Guney; Laia Subirats; Simona Mellino; Annalisa Gigante; Alfonso Valencia; María José Rementeria; Antonella Santuccione Chadha; Nikolaos Mavridis
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-06-01

5.  Reaching Those at Highest Risk for Suicide: Development of a Model Using Machine Learning Methods for use With Native American Communities.

Authors:  Emily E Haroz; Colin G Walsh; Novalene Goklish; Mary F Cwik; Victoria O'Keefe; Allison Barlow
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  2019-11-06

6.  Addressing bias in prediction models by improving subpopulation calibration.

Authors:  Noam Barda; Gal Yona; Guy N Rothblum; Philip Greenland; Morton Leibowitz; Ran Balicer; Eitan Bachmat; Noa Dagan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Addressing health disparities in the Food and Drug Administration's artificial intelligence and machine learning regulatory framework.

Authors:  Kadija Ferryman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Underrepresented racial minorities in biomedical informatics doctoral programs: graduation trends and academic placement (2002-2017).

Authors:  Kevin Wiley; Brian E Dixon; Shaun J Grannis; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Identifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications.

Authors:  Danton S Char; Michael D Abràmoff; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 11.229

10.  Epistemic Authority and Trust in Shared Decision Making About Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  William F Parker; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2020-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.