| Literature DB >> 30504757 |
Na Cheng1, Juhua Xiao2, Shanfei Ge1, Juntao Li3, Jiansheng Huang1, Xiaoping Wu1, Shouhua Zhang4, Tianxin Xiang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to detect and analyze miR-146b-mediated circular RNA (circRNA) expression in hepatic stellate cells. MATERIAL AND METHODS The experiment was divided into a control group and a siRNA-miR-146b group. The interference efficiency of siRNA-miR-146b was confirmed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and the cells were collected, and total RNA was collected for high flux sequencing. The miRNA-targeted carcass were predicted. Finally, the expression of 5 circRNAs was verified by qRT-PCR. RESULTS miR-146b expression in the siRNA-miR-146b group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The quality of the original sequencing data and the processed data satisfied with the analysis, and the expression of circRNAs was modulated after the reduction of miR-146b. Among them, 18 circRNAs were upregulated, while 77 circRNAs were downregulated in the miR-146b group compared with the control group. The gene prediction showed that hsa_circ1887 was the largest contact point in miRNA and circRNA regulatory networks. qRT-PCR showed that rno-circRNA-469, rno-circRNA-1138, rno-circRNA-2168 and rno-circRAN-1907 were significantly reduced, while circRNA-1984 was significantly promoted in the siRNA-miR-146b group compared with the control group, which were consistent with the measurements by high-throughput sequencing technique. CONCLUSIONS miR-146b could regulate the expression of circRNAs in HSCs, which might take part in the formation and development of hepatic fibrosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30504757 PMCID: PMC6286633 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.910807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
The primers for different circRNAs.
| circRNAs | Sequences of the primers | Length (bp) | Product length (bp) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rno-circRNA-1907 F | CTGTGTGCCCCCAGGTCTAC | 20 | 174 | 62.0 |
| rno-circRNA-1907 R | TATCATGGCCCGTCTCCAGC | 20 | ||
| rno-circRNA-2168 F | GCGCCTTGCTGGATACTGTG | 20 | 174 | 62.1 |
| rno-circRNA-2168 R | GCACAGCGAATGGATGGAGC | 20 | ||
| rno-circRNA-1138 F | CGTGGACGAGGAGCCAGTAG | 20 | 177 | 62.0 |
| rno-circRNA-1138 R | GGCCCAGCTCCTTTTTCTGC | 20 | ||
| rno-circRNA-469 F | TACCCTGCGTGTGGTCATCG | 20 | 137 | 62.1 |
| rno-circRNA-469 R | GTGTCGGTGACAGGAAGCCT | 20 | ||
| rno-circRNA-1984 F | AGGGGGTTGGTGTTGCTGAA | 20 | 145 | 62.0 |
| rno-circRNA-1984 R | GGTGAGGGAGGGAAAAGCCT | 20 | ||
| U6-F | CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | 17 | 94 | 60.0 |
| U6-R | AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT | 20 |
Figure 1miR-146b siRNA reduces miR-146b expression. * P<0.05 compared with control.
Quality analysis of the original data.
| Groups | Number of sequences | Bases (bp) | Error rate (%) | Q20 (%) | Q30 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 109622526 | 16553001426 | 0.0115 | 98.30 | 95.72 |
| miR-146b | 129909998 | 19616409698 | 0.0115 | 98.24 | 95.62 |
Quality control analysis.
| Groups | Number of sequences | Bases (bp) | Error rate (%) | Q20 (%) | Q30 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 107124938 | 14224896706 | 0.0107 | 99.05 | 96.96 |
| miR-146b | 127157642 | 16863219046 | 0.0107 | 99.05 | 96.92 |
Comparison of the data.
| Samples | Genome mapping (%) | JUNC (%) | RIBO mapping (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| miR-146b_Read1 | 64.38 | 0.05 | 0.29 |
| miR-146b_Read2 | 64.38 | 0.05 | 0.29 |
| Control_Read1 | 68.11 | 0.04 | 0.27 |
| Control_Read2 | 68.08 | 0.04 | 0.27 |
Figure 2Types of circRNAs in control and siRNA-miR-146b groups.
Figure 3Expression of different types of circRNAs after inhibition of miR-146b.
Figure 4Differential gene analysis (HSC – Control, HSC146B for group miR-146b).
Figure 5miRNA and circRNA regulatory network. The rhombus represents the ring RNA, and the arrow represents the miRNAs associated with the circRNAs.
Figure 6The expression of 5 circRNA by QRT-PCR. (A) rno-circRNA-469; (B) rno-circRNA-1138; (C) rno-circRNA-2168; (D) rno-circRNA-1907; (E) rno-circRNA-1984. * P<0.05 compared with control.