Sebastian R Nielsen1, Valeria Quaranta1, Andrea Linford1, Perpetua Emeagi1, Carolyn Rainer1, Almudena Santos1, Lucy Ireland1, Takao Sakai2, Keiko Sakai2, Yong-Sam Kim3,4, Dannielle Engle5,6, Fiona Campbell1, Daniel Palmer1, Jeong Heon Ko3,4, David A Tuveson5,6,7, Emilio Hirsch8, Ainhoa Mielgo1, Michael C Schmid1. 1. Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK. 2. Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Ashton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK. 3. Aging Intervention Research Center, KRIBB, 125 Gwahak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Deajeon 305-806, Korea. 4. Korea University of Science and Technology, 217 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-350, Korea. 5. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA. 6. Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA. 7. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA. 8. Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Center for Molecular Biotechnology, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating metastatic disease for which better therapies are urgently needed. Macrophages enhance metastasis in many cancer types; however, the role of macrophages in PDAC liver metastasis remains poorly understood. Here we found that PDAC liver metastasis critically depends on the early recruitment of granulin-secreting inflammatory monocytes to the liver. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that granulin secretion by metastasis-associated macrophages (MAMs) activates resident hepatic stellate cells (hStCs) into myofibroblasts that secrete periostin, resulting in a fibrotic microenvironment that sustains metastatic tumour growth. Disruption of MAM recruitment or genetic depletion of granulin reduced hStC activation and liver metastasis. Interestingly, we found that circulating monocytes and hepatic MAMs in PDAC patients express high levels of granulin. These findings suggest that recruitment of granulin-expressing inflammatory monocytes plays a key role in PDAC metastasis and may serve as a potential therapeutic target for PDAC liver metastasis.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating metastatic disease for which better therapies are urgently needed. Macrophages enhance metastasis in many cancer types; however, the role of macrophages in PDAC liver metastasis remains poorly understood. Here we found that PDAC liver metastasis critically depends on the early recruitment of granulin-secreting inflammatory monocytes to the liver. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that granulin secretion by metastasis-associated macrophages (MAMs) activates resident hepatic stellate cells (hStCs) into myofibroblasts that secrete periostin, resulting in a fibrotic microenvironment that sustains metastatic tumour growth. Disruption of MAM recruitment or genetic depletion of granulin reduced hStC activation and liver metastasis. Interestingly, we found that circulating monocytes and hepatic MAMs in PDAC patients express high levels of granulin. These findings suggest that recruitment of granulin-expressing inflammatory monocytes plays a key role in PDAC metastasis and may serve as a potential therapeutic target for PDAC liver metastasis.
Pancreatic cancer is among the most lethal cancers in part due to its
aggressive metastatic nature 1, 2. Metastatic spreading is a multistage process,
which starts with the dissemination of cancer cells from the primary tumour site and
ends with clinically detectable metastatic outgrowth at distant organs. Tumours can
release large numbers of cancer cells into the circulation, but only a small
proportion of these cells are able to successfully survive and colonise the hostile
environment at the distant metastatic site 3,
4. Thus, the successful outgrowth of
metastatic tumour cells in this new distant environment is a severe rate limiting
step during metastasis. Emerging evidence indicates that the colonisation of a new
organ by metastatic tumour cells critically depends on the support of non-cancerous
stromal partners 5–8. Multiple steps of the metastatic cascade are
supported by stromal partners, particularly macrophages and, in many cancers,
metastasis correlates with increased macrophages at the metastatic site 9–14. PDAC is characterised by its formation of ductal structures and a
rich stromal compartment containing mainly fibroblasts, stellate cells and
infiltrating immune cells. In response to the presence of tumour cells, quiescent
fibroblasts and stellate cells become activated myofibroblasts that express alpha
smooth muscle actin (αSMA) 15. In non-pathological conditions, myofibroblasts are critical for
wound healing 16. In cancer, the role of
myofibroblasts is currently controversial. Previous studies have suggested that
myofibroblasts support tumour growth and restrict the delivery of chemotherapeutic
drugs to the tumour 17–19. However, recent reports have shown that
genetic depletion of myofibroblasts results in tumour progression and metastasis
20, 21. Most pancreatic cancer studies have focused on the role of stromal
partners at the primary site, however, the role of stromal cells at the secondary
metastatic site, which for PDAC is most often the liver, remains poorly
understood.At the moment, the best treatment option for PDAC patients is resection of
the pancreatic tumour, but, unfortunately, by the time PDAC patients are diagnosed,
the majority (~ 80%) present with non-resectable metastatic cancer. Moreover,
more than 60% of the patients whose tumours are resected, relapse with distant
hepatic recurrence within the first 24 months after surgery 22, 23. Thus, a better
understanding of the mechanisms underlying the metastatic process in pancreatic
cancer is critical to improve treatment and patient outcome.
Results
Metastatic PDAC cells trigger macrophage recruitment and an extensive stromal
response in the liver
The most common route of PDAC metastasis is to the liver. To understand
whether and how stromal cells influence liver PDAC metastasis, we first analysed
liver biopsies from advanced metastatic PDAC patients and healthy volunteers by
immunohistochemical (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) techniques. We found that
metastatic tumour cells (cytokeratin+) are surrounded by an abnormal
stromal compartment rich in hematopoietic immune cells (CD45+),
macrophages (CD68+), myofibroblasts
(αSMA+;
PDGFRα+) and connective tissue deposition
(Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a-c).
To further evaluate the type of immune cells accumulating at the metastatic
site, we intrasplenically injected KPC-derived cells (FC1199), isolated from the
genetically engineered mouse model of PDAC
(KrasG12D;Trp53R172H;Pdx1-Cre mice) 24. In this model, tumour cells migrate to
the liver via the portal circulation (a common way of metastasis occurring in
humans) 25, 26, and generate metastases restricted to the liver (Supplementary Fig. 1d).
We analysed established metastatic tumours at day 12, by flow cytometry, and
found that the percentage of CD45+ immune cells, B220+ B
cells, CD3+ T cells, Nk1.1+ NK cells,
CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils, and F4/80+
macrophages were increased in tumour bearing livers compared to tumour free
livers (Supplementary Fig.
2a-c). However, among the CD45+ immune cells, metastasis
associated macrophages (MAM;
CD11b+F4/80+Ly6GnegCCR2+) were
the most predominant cell population (Fig.
1b, Supplementary
Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). Interestingly, metastatic tumour cells
initially induced a rapid accumulation of
CD11b+F4/80negLy6C+LY6GnegCCR2+
inflammatory monocytes (IM) followed by an accumulation of MAMs (Supplementary Fig. 3a).
In contrast, accumulation of αSMA+
myofibroblasts and stromal expansion, were detected only in established
experimental and spontaneous metastatic lesions (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Fig. 3b - g)
Figure 1
Metastatic PDAC cells induce macrophage recruitment and activation of
myofibroblasts in the liver
(a) Identification of pan-cytokeratin (CK)+ metastatic pancreatic
cancer cells, hematopoietic cells (CD45+), macrophages
(CD68+) and myofibroblasts (αSMA+) as
predominant cell types at the hepatic metastatic microenvironment of pancreatic
cancer by immunohistochemical analysis of human biopsies. Representative
micrographs and quantification of the data are shown (n = 5 PDAC patients, n= 5
healthy subjects; five fields assessed per sample; mean ± s.e.m;
two-tailed unpaired t-test). HL= healthy liver, LM= liver metastasis.
(b) Established metastatic nodules in the liver were processed 12 days post
intrasplenic implantation of 1x106 KPC and analysed by flow
cytometry. Composition of intrametastatic leukocytes is shown as a percentage of
CD45+ cells using the following definitions: B cells
(CD45+CD3negB220+); T cells
(CD45+B220negCD3+), NK cells
(CD45+B220negCD3negNK1.1+),
Neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+F4/80neg), MAMs
(CD11b+F4/80+) (n= 4 healthy livers; n = 8 liver
metastasis; data combine two independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m;
two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(c) Representative immunofluorescence staining of myofibroblasts
(αSMA+) clustering around metastatic
KPCluc/zsGreen (zsGreen) cells in the liver at 5 and 12 days
after implantation. Histogram: quantification of myeloid cells
(CD11b+) and myofibroblasts (αSMA+) cell
frequency in livers during the course of metastasis formation. Nuclei were
counterstained with DAPI (n = 6 mice per time point; four fields assessed per
sample; data combine two independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m;
two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(d) Representative Masson’s trichrome staining of tumour bearing livers at
5 and 12 days after implantation. Histogram: quantification of area occupied by
fibrotic stroma (n = 6 mice per time point; four fields assessed per sample;
data combine two independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed
unpaired t-test).
(e) Schematic of the generation of chimeric mice resulting in tdTomatoRed
positive BM derived macrophages and non-labelled resident Kupffer cells
(KC).
(f) Chimeric mice from (e) were intrasplenically implanted with 1x106
Panc02 cells and livers were harvested after day 12. Immunofluorescence analysis
of bone marrow derived tdTomatoRed+ cells in combination with F4/80
staining and αSMA staining in tumour bearing livers. Nuclei were
counterstained with DAPI (data are from 6 mice per condition; one
experiment).
Scale bars = 100µm; ns, not significant.
Macrophages in the liver can be broadly categorised into two classes:
embryonically derived tissue-resident macrophages known as Kupffer cells (KC),
and infiltrating macrophages derived from IM that originate from the bone marrow
27–30. To investigate whether the increased MAMs we observe is
due to an expansion of resident KC or to the recruitment of BM-derived cells, we
generated bone marrow chimeras by engrafting tdTomato red (tdTomato) BM into
irradiated wild type mice (WT + tdTomato+ BM) or WT BM into
irradiated WT mice (WT + WT BM). Since KCs in the liver are radio-resistant
31, they remain of host origin and
are therefore F4/80+ tdTomatoneg, whereas BM-derived
macrophages are of donor origin and F4/80+ tdTomato+
(Fig. 1e). After confirming successful
BM reconstitution (Supplementary Fig. 3h), chimeric mice were intrasplenically
implanted with the murine PDAC cell line Panc02 32. We found that MAMs were exclusively tdTomato+, and
thus, derived from BM (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 3i).
Conversely, in adjacent “normal liver tissue”, F4/80+
macrophages, remained tdTomatoneg, consistent with resident
F4/80+ KC (Fig. 1f). In
addition, αSMA+ metastasis associated
myofibroblasts remained tdTomatoneg, suggesting that these cells are
not from BM origin, but are locally activated mesenchymal cells, such as
resident hepatic stellate cells (hStCs) or fibroblasts (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 3j). Together, our findings demonstrate
that i) in PDAC liver metastasis, MAMs originate from IM, ii) MAMs represent the
predominant immune cell population in metastatic liver lesions, and iii) MAM
accumulation in the liver precedes myofibroblast activation.
Macrophages promote myofibroblast activation and metastatic growth
To determine the functional role of MAMs in pancreatic cancer metastasis,
we next intrasplenically implanted KPC cells into isogenic
PI3Kγ-/- mice
(p110γ-/-) 33 and control WT mice. PI3Kγis
mainly expressed in the hematopoietic compartment, and
PI3Kγ knockout mice have a defect in monocyte
recruitment in response to inflammatory and tumour derived signals 34, 35. Since we previously found that MAMs are IM-derived macrophages
that are actively recruited from the BM to the metastatic liver (Fig. 1f), we hypothesised that depletion of
PI3Kγ will ablate IM trafficking to the metastatic
site and consequently abolish MAM accumulation in the liver. Indeed, macrophage
and IM numbers were significantly reduced in metastatic livers of
PI3Kγ-/- mice compared to WT mice as
measured by flow cytometry analysis (Fig.
2a). Importantly, PI3Kγ depletion markedly
reduced metastatic frequency, average metastatic lesion size, and
αSMA+ myofibroblast numbers, in both KPC
(Fig. 2b - d and Supplementary Fig. 4a)
and Panc02 (Supplementary Fig.
4b - e) liver metastasis bearing mice. Together, these results
suggest that inhibition of BM-derived macrophage recruitment to the liver
prevents pancreatic cancer metastasis to the liver and is accompanied by a
decrease in myofibroblast activation.
Figure 2
Macrophages promote myofibroblast activation and metastatic growth
(a - d) Liver metastasis was induced by intrasplenic implantation of
1x106 KPC cells. Entire livers were harvested and analysed 12
days later.
(a) Hematopoietic cells (CD45+), MAMs
(CD45+CD11b+F4/80+), and IM
(CD45+CD11b+Ly6C+F4/80negLy6Gneg)
from tumour bearing livers of wild type (WT) versus PI3Kγ-/-
(-/-) mice were evaluated by flow cytometry (n = 6 mice WT; n = 8 mice
PI3Kγ-/-; data combine two independent experiments;
individual data points, horizontal lines represent mean ± s.e.m;
two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(b, c) Quantification of metastatic frequency (b) and average metastatic lesion
size (c) in WT and PI3Kγ-/- (-/-) mice by HE stained liver
sections (n = 7 mice WT; n = 9 mice PI3Kγ-/-; data combine two
independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(d) Representative immunofluorescence staining and quantification of MAMs
(F4/80+) and myofibroblasts (αSMA+) cell
frequency in livers in WT and PI3Kγ-/- (-/-). Nuclei were
counterstained with DAPI (n = 6 mice WT; n = 8 mice PI3Kγ-/-;
four fields assessed per sample; data combine two independent experiments; mean
± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(e - h) Liver metastasis was induced by intrasplenic implantation of
1x106 KPC cells. Macrophages were depleted by clodronate liposome
treatment after initial colonization of the liver had occurred.
(e) Schematic illustration of the experiment.
(f) Representative immunofluorescent staining and quantification of MAMs
(F4/80+) and myofibroblasts (αSMA+) cell
frequency in tumour bearing livers treated with liposomes containing PBS (PL) or
clodronate (CL). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (n = 4 mice per condition;
five fields assessed per sample; one experiment; mean ± s.e.m; two tailed
unpaired t-test).
(g, h) Evaluation of metastatic frequency (g) and area covered by metastatic
cells (h) in tumour bearing livers of mice treated with PL or CL (n = 4 mice per
condition; all metastatic nodules assessed from one section per sample; one
experiment; individual data and mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired
t-test).
Scale bars = 100µm; ns, not significant.
Since the majority (~ 80%) of PDAC patients, present with liver
metastases at time of diagnosis, or relapse with hepatic recurrence after
surgical removal of primary pancreatic tumours 1, we next focused our studies on investigating whether MAMs are
required for supporting the metastatic growth of already disseminated cancer
cells. To address this question, we chemically depleted MAMs in
vivo, using clodronate liposomes (CL)36. CL treatment was started at day 3 post intrasplenic
injection of KPC cells, a time point in which initial seeding of the liver by
KPC cells has already occurred (Fig. 2e and
Supplement Fig. 5a,
b). As expected, in response to CL treatment, MAM numbers were
significantly reduced (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 5c).
Interestingly, we could barely detect any
αSMA+ myofibroblasts in metastatic livers
of CL treated mice (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 5c).
The ablation of MAMs and the prevention of
αSMA+ myofibroblast accumulation was not
cell line specific since similar results were observed using Panc02 cells (Supplementary Fig. 5d,
e). Although the metastatic frequency was only modestly affected by CL
treatment in both models, the size of the lesion area covered by metastatic
cells was significantly reduced in response to macrophage depletion (Fig. 2g, h and Supplementary Fig. 5f,
g). Together, these results suggest that depletion of MAMs prevents the
activation of myofibroblasts and impairs the progression of metastatic lesions
even after initial colonisation of the metastatic site by cancer cells.
Granulin secreted by macrophages triggers myofibroblast activation
We next sought to understand how MAMs regulate myofibroblast activation
at the metastatic site. In this respect, we found that macrophage conditioned
media (CM) acts as a strong activator of quiescent primary fibroblasts in
culture and enhances their invasion and proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 6a-c).
To identify the macrophage-derived factors responsible for myofibroblast
activation, we next exposed human THP-1 macrophages to the pancreatic cancer
cell line Panc1 CM in vitro, and performed a secretome
analysis. We identified several extracellular matrix proteases associated with
macrophage function 37–39 (Supplementary Table 1, 2). Among the most highly secreted
proteins we identified granulin (Grn), an approximately 70 kDa secreted
glycoprotein that has previously been shown to mediate wound healing, by
stimulating fibroblast migration 40, and
to induce fibrosis in breast cancer 41.
Since the main source of myofibroblasts in the liver are activated resident
hStCs (Supplementary Fig.
3j) 16, we next isolated
primary hStCs from mice and stimulated them with CM generated from primary
murine WT BM derived macrophages or Grn-/- (granulin deficient)
murine BM macrophages (BMM). We found that CM generated from WT, but not from
Grn-/- , BMM efficiently activated isogenic hStCs and promoted
their migration (Fig. 3a, b). Importantly,
addition of recombinant granulin to Grn-/- BMM CM was sufficient to
restore hStCs activation and migration (Fig. 3a,
b). Next, we isolated MAMs from tumour bearing livers derived from
chimeric WT + WT BM and WT + Grn-/- BM mice, and prepared MAM CM. We
confirmed that only CM from WT MAMs efficiently induced hStCs activation and
migration, while CM from Grn-/- MAM was unable to induce activation
or migration of hStCs (Fig. 3c - e). In
addition, we found that granulin expression and secretion is increased in tumour
educated (Fig. 3f, g) and alternatively
(M2-like) activated macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 6d, e). Together, these data indicate
that cancer cell derived factors induce the secretion of granulin in macrophages
and that MAMs activate resident hStCs via granulin.
Figure 3
Granulin secreted by macrophages activates hepatic stellate cells
(a) Quantification of αSMA (Acta2), and collagen 1a
(Col1a) mRNA levels in primary hStCs stimulated with
isogenic macrophage conditioned media (MCM) generated from wild type (WT) or
granulin deficient (Grn-/-) macrophages, and CM generated from
Grn-/- macrophages in the presence of recombinant granulin
(rGranulin) as determined by qPCR (n = 3 independent experiments; mean ±
s.e.m.; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(b) Quantification hStCs invasion towards MCM generated from WT or
Grn-/- deficient macrophages and MCM generated from
Grn-/- in the presence of rGranulin (n = 3 independent
experiments; mean ± s.e.m.; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(c, d) same as (a, b), but MCM was generated using in vivo
derived MAMs. Therefore liver metastasis was induced by intrasplenic
implantation of 1x106 KPC cells into isogenic WT + WT BM and WT +
Grn-/- BM chimeric mice (n = 3 independent experiments; mean
± s.e.m.; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(e) Representative immunofluorescence images of (d) showing Vybrant Dil (Em565)
labelled murine hStCs showing invasion towards MCM generated from WT and Grn-/-
MAMs and MCM generated from Grn-/- MAMs in the presence of recombinant granulin
(rGranulin) (data are from three independent experiments).
(f, g) Quantification of granulin mRNA levels by qPCR (f) and
granulin secretion by ELISA (g) in primary unstimulated (M0) macrophages and
macrophages stimulated with isogenic CM media generated from murine KPC and
Panc02 tumour cells (n = 3 independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m.;
two-tailed unpaired t-test).
Scale bar = 100 µm; ns, not significant.
Granulin is highly expressed in pancreatic cancer metastatic lesions of mice
and humans and MAMs are the main source of granulin in vivo
In vivo, we found that within the metastatic tumour
microenvironment, granulin is highly expressed in MAMs, and that MAMs are the
main source of granulin secretion in metastatic lesions (Fig. 4a, b). When we analysed chimeric mice harbouring
tdTomatoRed BM, we found that BM derived MAMs, but not resident KC, express high
levels of granulin (Fig.
4c). Surprisingly, expression levels of Tgfb, a
common activator of hStCs 42, were low in
MAMs and KC (Fig. 4c).
Figure 4
Granulin is highly expressed in hepatic metastatic lesions and metastasis
associated macrophages are the main source of granulin secretion
(a, b) Quantification of granulin mRNA levels (a) and granulin
protein levels (b) in intrametastatic pancreatic cancer cells, immune cell
depleted stromal cells (zsGreennegCD45neg), and MAMs
(CD45+F4/80+) isolated by fluorescence activated cell
sorting from established tumour bearing livers 12 days after intrasplenic
implantation of 1x106 KPCluc/zsGreen cancer cells (a, data
are from three pooled mice; one experiment; b, n = 3 independent experiments;
mean ± s.e.m.; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(c) Quantification of granulin and Tgfb mRNA
levels in tissue resident (KC) and MAMs sorted from established metastatic
lesions from chimeric WT mice harbouring tdTomatoRed+ BM as described in Fig. 1g
(data are from three pooled mice; one experiment).
(d) Spontaneous metastatic hepatic tumours derived from KPC mice were isolated
and analysed. Representative images of immunohistochemistry staining for MAMs
(CD68+) and granulin expression on serial tissue sections from
metastatic lesions and healthy liver and quantification of the data (n = 5
control mice, n = 5 KPC mice, five fields assessed per sample; mean ±
s.e.m.; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(e) Representative images of immunohistochemistry staining for MAMs
(CD68+) and granulin expression on serial tissue sections from
human metastatic PDAC lesions and healthy liver and quantification of the data
(n = 5 healthy subjects, n = 5 PDAC samples; five fields assessed per sample;
mean ± s.e.m.; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
Finally, we further confirmed that granulin is highly expressed in the
stroma of spontaneous hepatic metastatic lesions of human and murine tissues
24
43 (Fig.
4d, e and Supplementary Fig. 6f). Taken together, our findings indicate that
granulin is highly expressed by MAMs and that MAMs are the main source of
granulin in PDAC liver metastasis.
Depletion of granulin prevents liver fibrosis and PDAC metastatic
growth
To investigate whether granulin is required for PDAC metastatic
progression in vivo, we next inoculated Grn-/- and
WT mice with isogenic KPC cells through intrasplenic implantation. We observed
that lack of granulin expression did not alter metastatic frequency since WT and
Grn-/- mice showed similar numbers of metastatic nodules (Fig. 5a, b). However, the area covered by
metastatic tumour cells in Grn-/- mice was significantly smaller
compared to WT, resulting in an overall significant decrease of hepatic
metastatic tumour burden (Fig. 5a, c).
While depletion of granulin did not reduce the number of total MAMs (Fig. 5d), nor their polarisation at the
metastatic site (Supplementary
Fig. 7a), granulin deficiency abolished the accumulation of activated
myofibroblasts in metastatic liver lesions (Fig.
5d). Quantitative gene expression analysis of myofibroblast
activation markers (Acta2, Fn, Col1a1) 16, further confirmed that lack of granulin prevents the
activation of intrametastatic hStCs into myofibroblasts in vivo
(Fig. 5e).
Figure 5
Granulin depletion prevents myofibroblast activation and PDAC
metastasis
Liver metastasis was induced by intrasplenic implantation of 5x105 KPC
cells into WT and granulin deficient (Grn-/-;) mice (a – e)
and chimeric WT + WT BM and WT + Grn-/- BM mice (f – l).
Entire livers were harvested and analysed 12 days later.
(a) Representative images of HE staining of liver sections (data are from 6 WT
and 7 Grn-/- mice; one experiment).
(b) Metastatic frequency (n = 6 WT mice, n = 7 Grn-/- mice; all
metastatic nodules assessed from one section per sample; one experiment;
individual data points, horizontal lines represent mean ± s.e.m;
two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(c) Metastatic area (n = 6 WT mice, n = 7 Grn-/- mice; all metastatic
nodules assessed from one section per sample; one experiment; mean ±
s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(d) Representative immunofluorescent staining and quantification of MAMs
(F4/80+) and myofibroblasts (αSMA+) cell
frequency in tumour bearing livers. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (n = 6
WT mice, n = 7 Grn-/- mice; four fields assess per sample; one
experiment; mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(e) qPCR analysis of multiple hStCs activation markers in intrametastatic
myofibroblasts isolated from established metastatic lesions (data are from three
pooled mice per condition; one experiment).
(f) Metastatic frequency (n = 5 WT + WT BM mice, n = 6 WT + Grn-/- BM
mice; all metastatic nodules assessed from one section per sample; one
experiment; individual data points, horizontal lines represent mean ±
s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(g) Metastatic area (n = 5 WT + WT BM mice, n = 6 WT + Grn-/- BM mice;
all metastatic nodules assessed from one section per sample; one experiment;
mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(h) Representative immunofluorescence staining and quantification of MAMs
(F4/80+) and myofibroblasts (αSMA+) cell
frequency in tumour bearing livers. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (n = 5
WT + WT BM mice, n = 6 WT + Grn-/- BM mice; four fields assessed per
sample; one experiment; mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(i) qPCR analysis of multiple hStCs activation markers in intrametastatic
myofibroblasts isolated from established metastatic lesions (data are from five
pooled mice per condition; one experiment).
(j, k) Representative IHC staining and quantification of Ki67+ tumour cell
frequency (j) and cleaved caspase 3+ cell numbers (k) in metastatic livers (n =
5 WT + WT BM mice, n = 6 WT + Grn-/- BM mice; five fields assessed
per sample; one experiment; mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired
t-test).
(l) qPCR analysis of multiple M2- and M1- macrophage associated genes in MAMs
isolated from metastatic tumours developed in WT + WT BM and WT +
Grn-/- BM mice (data are from 6 pooled mice per condition; one
experiment).
Scale bars = 100μm; ns, not significant.
Next, we characterised metastatic pancreatic tumour growth in WT mice
transplanted with BM from Grn-/- or WT animals. We found that
depletion of granulin in the hematopoietic compartment was sufficient to
suppress metastatic growth of KPC cells (Fig. 5f,
g) and to prevent myofibroblast activation in vivo
(Fig. 5h, i), while MAM numbers and
polarisation remained unchanged (Fig. 5j
and Supplementary Fig.
7b). Interestingly, ablation of granulin in the hematopoietic
compartment markedly reduced the number of proliferating (Ki67+)
metastatic pancreatic tumour cells (Fig.
5k), while apoptotic (cleaved caspase 3+) tumour cell numbers
remained unchanged (Fig. 5l). Taken
together, these results suggest that granulin secretion by MAMs is required for
hStCs activation and for metastatic growth of pancreatic tumours in the
liver.
Granulin induces periostin expression in hStCs thereby allowing tumour
growth
Next, we sought to gain a better understanding of how MAM-induced
myofibroblast activation promotes pancreatic cancer cell growth. To address this
question, we stimulated human fibroblasts with macrophage CM and performed a
mass spectrometry quantitative analysis of the secretome from fibroblasts
exposed to macrophage CM compared to unexposed fibroblasts. We found that
macrophage CM induces fibroblast secretion of proteins associated with ECM
remodelling (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 3),
and in particular the secretion of the ECM component periostin (Fig. 6b). Periostin has been reported to
enhance metastatic growth of breast and colon cancer cells through activation of
Wnt and αvβ3-Akt/PKB
signalling pathways, respectively 8, 44. Thus, we next tested whether periostin
expression by activated myofibroblasts is necessary to promote pancreatic cancer
cell survival and growth. We found that myofibroblasts CM markedly promoted
colony formation and proliferation of PDAC cancer cells, and that addition of a
periostin neutralising antibody completely abolished these effects (Fig. 6c, Supplementary Fig. 7c).
We confirmed that periostin acts in a paracrine myofibroblast-tumour cell loop
since we did not detect any periostin expression in PDAC cells (Supplementary Fig. 7d).
Moreover, we found that periostin was markedly upregulated in spontaneous
hepatic metastatic lesions of human and murine tissues compared to healthy
control livers (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 7e).
Importantly, the induction of periostin expression in primary hStCs was strictly
dependent on granulin, since CM generated from Grn-/- BMM (Fig. 7a) and MAMs (Fig. 7b, c) was unable to induce periostin expression in
hStCs. To examine whether inhibition of myofibroblasts activation by
MAMs-derived granulin also affects periostin expression and stroma expansion
in vivo, we analysed metastatic liver tissue sections of
WT, PI3Kγ-/-, Grn-/-, WT +
Grn-/- BM, and WT+CL treated mice. In all models, hepatic
periostin expression levels and connective tissue deposition were found to be
significantly reduced compared to metastasis bearing WT control animals (Fig. 7d, e and Supplementary Fig. 7f,
g). In agreement with these findings, we found that intrametastatic
myofibroblasts isolated from Grn-/- and WT + Grn-/- BM
mice showed an approximately threefold reduction in periostin expression
relative to control myofibroblasts isolated from WT tumour lesions (Fig. 7f). Taken together, these findings
indicate that MAMs induce the expression of ECM proteins in myofibroblasts,
particularly periostin, in a granulin-dependent manner which then supports
metastatic pancreatic tumour growth.
Figure 6
Myofibroblast secreted periostin enhances pancreatic cancer cell
growth.
(a) Top gene ontology (GO) functions of secreted proteins enriched in human
myofibroblasts (Mf) following in vitro education with
macrophage conditioned media (CM).
(b) Fold change rank of identified proteins associated with extracellular matrix
organisation. Data were obtained from one experiment assessing two biologically
independent samples (Green = periostin).
(c) Colony formation assay of primary murine KPC cells, murine Panc02, and human
Panc1 cells in the presence or absence of Mf CM and periostin neutralising
antibody (anti-Periostin). Representative images reflecting colonies and single
cells are displayed for KPC cells (n = 3 independent experiments; mean ±
s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(d) Immunohistochemical stainings of periostin in human liver biopsies (n = 5
healthy subjects, n= 5 PDAC; five fields assessed per sample; mean ±
s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test) and in spontaneous metastatic liver tumours
collected from KPC mice (n = 5 mice per condition; five fields assessed per
sample, mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test). Representative
micrographs and quantification of the data. HL = healthy liver, LM = liver
metastasis.
Scale bars = 100μm.
Figure 7
Macrophage derived granulin induces periostin expression by hepatic stellate
cells in vitro and in vivo.
(a) Evaluation of periostin (Postn) mRNA expression levels in
primary hStCs following stimulation with CM collected from BM WT or
Grn-/- macrophages in the presence or absence of recombinant
granulin (rGranulin) (n = 3 independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m.;
two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(b, c) Evaluation of periostin (Postn) mRNA levels by qPCR (b)
and periostin protein levels by ELISA (c) in primary hStCs following stimulation
with CM collected from in vivo derived WT or Grn-/-
MAMs, in the presence or absence of recombinant granulin (rGranulin) (n = 3
independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m.; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(d, e) Evaluation of periostin deposition and fibrotic stroma formation in
metastatic livers of control WT, WT mice treated with clodronate liposomes (CL),
PI3Kγ-/-, Grn-/-, and WT + Grn-/- BM
mice 12 days after intrasplenic implantation of KPC cells. (d) Representative
immunofluorescence staining and quantification of periostin deposition. Nuclei
were counterstained with DAPI. (e) Representative Masson’s trichrome
staining (MTS) and quantification of area occupied by fibrotic stroma (n = 4
mice per condition; four fields assessed per sample; data combine five
independent experiments; mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(f) Quantification of periostin (Postn) mRNA expression levels
by qPCR in intrametastatic myofibroblasts isolated from tumour bearing livers of
WT and Grn-/- mice, and chimeric WT + WT BM and WT +
Grn-/- BM mice (data are from six pooled mice per condition; one
experiment).
Scale bars = 100μm.
Although less frequently, PDAC can also sometimes metastasise to the
lung 1. Similar to what we observed in the
liver, granulin was markedly expressed in the stromal compartment of pulmonary
metastatic lesions, especially in areas rich in CD68+ macrophages
(Supplementary Fig.
8a). Depletion of granulin in the hematopoietic compartment (WT +
Grn-/- BM) was sufficient to reduce pulmonary metastatic growth
of PDAC cells, and to prevent myofibroblast activation, fibrotic stromal
expansion, and periostin deposition in vivo, while MAM numbers
remained unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 8b-e). To further explore whether this mechanism
is specific for the metastatic site, we next analysed primary PDAC tumours for
granulin and periostin expression. Interestingly, we found that at the primary
tumour site granulin is mainly expressed by tumour cells, and not by
macrophages, while periostin was strongly expressed in the surrounding stromal
compartment (Supplement Fig.
8f).Taken together, these data suggest that granulin expressing macrophages
play a critical role at the metastatic site, but not at the primary tumour
site.
Circulating IM from metastatic PDAC patients express granulin
Since granulin expressing MAMs originate from the BM, we next
investigated whether circulating IM express granulin. Therefore, we collected
fresh blood samples from PDAC patients with metastases, but prior to therapeutic
intervention, and from healthy control subjects, and purified IM
(CD14hiCD16neg) and resident monocytes (RM)
(CD14dimCD16hi) by fluorescence-activating cell
sorting 45. We found that the percentage
of IMs isolated from metastatic PDAC patients was significantly higher compared
with healthy subjects, while no differences were observed in the percentage of
resident monocytes (Fig. 8a,b and Supplementary Fig. 8g).
Importantly, IM isolated from PDAC patients and from metastatic KPC mice
exhibited abnormally elevated granulin expression levels
compared to healthy control subjects (Fig. 8c,
d).
Figure 8
Metastatic PDAC patients have increased circulating inflammatory monocytes
that express high levels of granulin
(a) Peripheral mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy subjects and
metastatic PDAC patients. Representative dot plot of inflammatory monocytes (IM;
CD14hiCD16neg) and resident monocytes (RM;
CD14dimCD16hi) after gating for the
CD45+CD3negB220negCD19negSytoxneg
cell population (data are from 6 different PDAC patients and 6 different healthy
subjects).
(b) Quantification of a. Percentage of monocyte populations in healthy subjects
and metastatic PDAC patients (n = 6 different healthy; n = 6 different PDAC
samples; individual data points, horizontal lines represent mean ± s.e.m.; two
tailed unpaired t-test). NS, not significant.
(c) Quantification of granulin mRNA levels in inflammatory
monocytes (IM) isolated from metastatic PDAC patients and healthy subjects (HS)
as described in (a, b) (n = 3 different healthy, n = 4 different PDAC samples;
mean ± s.e.m; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
(d) Quantification of granulin mRNA levels in circulating IM
sorted from KPC mice with pathological confirmed liver metastasis or tumour free
litter mates (data are from four pooled mice per condition; one experiment).
(e) Schematic depicting the role of macrophage-derived granulin in activation of
hStCs and in PDAC liver metastasis. Inflammatory monocytes are recruited to the
liver by metastatic pancreatic tumour cells through a PI3Kγ-dependent
mechanism. Once in the metastatic tissue, differentiated macrophages stimulate
the activation and recruitment of resident hStCs through granulin secretion
resulting in excessive accumulation of myofibroblasts. Granulin-induced
myofibroblasts release high levels of the extracellular matrix protein
periostin, thereby enhancing survival and growth of metastatic pancreatic cancer
cells in a hostile environment. Interruption of this sequence, by either
preventing macrophage accumulation or by abolishing granulin expression in
recruited macrophages, limits metastatic growth of pancreatic cancer cells.
Discussion
In this study, we aimed to gain a better understanding of the role of
macrophages in pancreatic cancer metastasis, with the hope to improve therapies for
this devastating disease. In this respect, we found that MAMs support pancreatic
cancer metastasis by secreting granulin, which consequently promotes the activation
of resident hStCs into αSMA+ myofibroblasts that secrete
high levels of periostin (Fig. 8e).
Collectively, our studies provide a comprehensive functional analysis of stroma -
tumour interaction in PDAC metastasis, and support the rationale for the development
of therapeutic approaches targeting stromal secreted pro-metastatic factors such as
granulin and periostin to disrupt the inter-relationship between MAMs,
myofibroblasts and cancer cells. In addition, we observed an increase of granulin
expressing IM in blood from metastatic PDAC patients and metastatic KPC mice
compared to healthy subjects. This observation suggests that granulin could also
potentially be used as a predictive biomarker of PDAC metastasis. However, to assess
the potential use of granulin as a predictive biomarker of PDAC metastasis, granulin
expression levels in IM derived from inflammatory, non-cancerous diseases, such as
pancreatitis, would be worth exploring in future analysis.The fact that MAMs isolated from metastatic lesions secrete high levels of
granulin, but resident macrophages (KC) do not (Fig.
4c), indicates that the recruitment of monocyte-derived macrophages is a
critical step during PDAC metastasis. We and others have previously shown that
cancer cells release chemotactic factors, including CCL2,
SDF-1α and mCSF1, to attract pro-tumorigenic monocytes
to the tumour, in a PI3Kγ-dependent manner 11, 35,
46–48. Consistent with this, we found that prevention of macrophage
recruitment, resulted in decreased hStCs activation, reduced periostin levels and
decreased metastasis to the liver.Using an unbiased mass spectrometry secretome analysis of cancer educated
macrophages, we identified the glycoprotein granulin. Granulin has previously been
associated with fibroblast activation and migration during wound healing 40. In addition, in breast cancer, granulin
expression correlates with increased fibrosis and poor survival 5, 41. In
agreement with a role for granulin in fibrosis, we found that macrophage secreted
granulin plays a critical role in PDAC metastasis by activating resident hStCs and
stimulating the secretion of periostin. The precise signalling pathway by which
granulin activates hStCs and primary fibroblasts remains unknown, as the cognate
cell-surface receptor to which granulin binds is still controversial 49–51. Interestingly, depletion of granulin in the hematopoietic
compartment did not change macrophage recruitment to the liver, macrophage
polarisation, or CD8+ T cell infiltration (Fig.
5 and Supplementary
Fig. 7).In agreement with Costa-Silva et al 52, we found that macrophages play a key role in PDAC metastasis. While
Costa-Silva and colleagues 52 describe a role
for resident hepatic macrophages in the establishment of a pre-metastatic niche that
facilitates initial tumour cells seeding, our work focuses on understanding the
subsequent step of metastatic growth. In this respect, we found that once tumour
cells have reached the metastatic site, their survival and outgrowth capacity
critically depends on the further recruitment of IM that secrete granulin.Unfortunately, current imaging approaches are unable to detect
micro-metastases and by the time pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed,
micro-metastatic spreading has already occurred in the majority of cases 1. Our findings suggest that recruitment of IM
that express granulin plays a key role in pancreatic cancer metastasis and may serve
both as a prognostic marker, and a potential target for PDAC liver metastasis.
Authors: Ingo Klein; Judith C Cornejo; Noelle K Polakos; Beena John; Sherry A Wuensch; David J Topham; Robert H Pierce; Ian Nicholas Crispe Journal: Blood Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Simon Yona; Ki-Wook Kim; Yochai Wolf; Alexander Mildner; Diana Varol; Michal Breker; Dalit Strauss-Ayali; Sergey Viukov; Martin Guilliams; Alexander Misharin; David A Hume; Harris Perlman; Bernard Malissen; Elazar Zelzer; Steffen Jung Journal: Immunity Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Michael C Schmid; Christie J Avraamides; Holly C Dippold; Irene Franco; Philippe Foubert; Lesley G Ellies; Lissette M Acevedo; Joan R E Manglicmot; Xiaodan Song; Wolfgang Wrasidlo; Sara L Blair; Mark H Ginsberg; David A Cheresh; Emilio Hirsch; Seth J Field; Judith A Varner Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Frederic Geissmann; Markus G Manz; Steffen Jung; Michael H Sieweke; Miriam Merad; Klaus Ley Journal: Science Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: T H Corbett; B J Roberts; W R Leopold; J C Peckham; L J Wilkoff; D P Griswold; F M Schabel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1984-02 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Shideng Bao; Gaoliang Ouyang; Xuefang Bai; Zhi Huang; Chaoyu Ma; Ming Liu; Rong Shao; Ryan M Anderson; Jeremy N Rich; Xiao-Fan Wang Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Justin A Kenkel; William W Tseng; Matthew G Davidson; Lorna L Tolentino; Okmi Choi; Nupur Bhattacharya; E Scott Seeley; Daniel A Winer; Nathan E Reticker-Flynn; Edgar G Engleman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Patrick O Azevedo; Ana E Paiva; Gabryella S P Santos; Luiza Lousado; Julia P Andreotti; Isadora F G Sena; Carlos A Tagliati; Akiva Mintz; Alexander Birbrair Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 9.264