Literature DB >> 3049651

Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation.

M A Pfaller1, L Burmeister, M S Bartlett, M G Rinaldi.   

Abstract

We initiated a comparative study of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation: a spectrophotometric method, the Wickerham card method, a hemacytometer method, and the Prompt inoculation system. The variability in inoculum size obtained when each method was applied to two strains each of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Torulopsis glabrata, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae was analyzed in a single laboratory. Each method was performed in triplicate on the same day and on three separate days to provide estimates of within-day and between-day variations. Inoculum size was determined by viable colony counts. The greatest range of inoculum sizes was seen with the Wickerham card method. Viable counts ranged from 1.1 X 10(6) to 24.2 X 10(6) CFU/ml among the 12 yeast isolates. The greatest variation was observed with the Prompt system. Within-day coefficients of variation averaged 19% (range, 4 to 45%), and between-day coefficients of variation averaged 22% (range, 3 to 51%). Variation between laboratories was evaluated by comparing inoculum values obtained by each method in three different laboratories for two strains of C. albicans. The spectrophotometric method was the least variable and the Wickerham card and hemacytometer methods were the most variable methods between laboratories. The spectrophotometric method is recommended as the method of choice for preparation of a standardized inoculum suspension for susceptibility testing of yeasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3049651      PMCID: PMC266638          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1437-1441.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

Review 1.  Antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  J N Galgiani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Azole resistance in Candida albicans.

Authors:  J F Ryley; R G Wilson; K J Barrett-Bee
Journal:  Sabouraudia       Date:  1984

3.  Evaluation of the Prompt inoculation system for preparation of standardized bacterial inocula.

Authors:  M E Lund; R W Hawkinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid inoculum standardization system: a novel device for standardization of inocula in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J H Wicks; R L Nelson; G E Krejcarek
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The use of the Prompt Inoculation System in preparing a standardized yeast inoculum.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; T Gerarden
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Turbidimetric studies of growth inhibition of yeasts with three drugs: inquiry into inoculum-dependent susceptibility testing, time of onset of drug effect, and implications for current and newer methods.

Authors:  J N Galgiant; D A Stevens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B.

Authors:  D L Calhoun; G D Roberts; J N Galgiani; J E Bennett; D S Feingold; J Jorgensen; G S Kobayashi; S Shadomy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Correlation of in vitro susceptibility test results with in vivo response: flucytosine therapy in a systemic candidiasis model.

Authors:  R L Stiller; J E Bennett; H J Scholer; M Wall; A Polak; D A Stevens
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Incidence of polyene-resistant yeasts recovered from clinical specimens.

Authors:  J D Dick; W G Merz; R Saral
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Variables influencing susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-fluorocytosine.

Authors:  E R Block; A E Jennings; J E Bennett
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  68 in total

1.  Growth competition between Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans under broth and biofilm growing conditions.

Authors:  W R Kirkpatrick; J L Lopez-Ribot; R K McAtee; T F Patterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; C W Kish; T M Kerkering; R A Fromtling; K Bartizal; J N Galgiani; K Villareal; M A Pfaller; T Gerarden; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Standardized susceptibility testing of fluconazole: an international collaborative study.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; B Dupont; G S Kobayashi; J Müller; M G Rinaldi; A Espinel-Ingroff; S Shadomy; P F Troke; T J Walsh; D W Warnock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Functions and activities of the Area Committee on Microbiology of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation for the in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; T M Kerkering
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Susceptibility testing of fungi: current status of correlation of in vitro data with clinical outcome.

Authors:  M A Ghannoum; J H Rex; J N Galgiani
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans with and without agitation: an eight-center collaborative study.

Authors:  E J Anaissie; V L Paetznick; L G Ensign; A Espinel-Ingroff; J N Galgiani; C A Hitchcock; M LaRocco; T Patterson; M A Pfaller; J H Rex; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Testing of organisms for susceptibility to triazoles: is it justified?

Authors:  G S Kobayashi; E D Spitzer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Effect of increasing inoculum sizes of pathogenic filamentous fungi on MICs of antifungal agents by broth microdilution method.

Authors:  A Gehrt; J Peter; P A Pizzo; T J Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Correlation between in vitro resistance to fluconazole and clinical outcome of oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  C Quereda; A M Polanco; C Giner; A Sánchez-Sousa; E Pereira; E Navas; J Fortún; A Guerrero; F Baquero
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.