Literature DB >> 6885994

Evaluation of the Prompt inoculation system for preparation of standardized bacterial inocula.

M E Lund, R W Hawkinson.   

Abstract

Standardized inocula prepared with the 3M Prompt inoculation system were evaluated by (i) performing colony counts on the inocula and (ii) employing these inocula in disk diffusion or broth microdilution susceptibility tests. The inoculation wand delivered 1.85 X 10(8.0) +/- 0.6 log10 CFU to the various diluents tested. Inocula prepared in 1 ml of saline and used to inoculate disk diffusion tests resulted in 96.5% agreement between Prompt and standard tests when Prompt inocula were used within 15 min of preparation and 95.6% agreement between paired tests when Prompt inocula were allowed to sit at room temperature for 2 h before use. With 15-min Prompt inocula, only one (0.04%) major discrepancy between paired tests was observed. The 2-h Prompt inocula gave three (0.13%) major or very major discrepancies. The 15-min Prompt inocula prepared in 30 ml of diluent resulted in 98.2% of Prompt minimal inhibitory concentrations within +/- 1 log2 dilution step of the standard test result, whereas the 2-h inocula resulted in 97.4% agreement between paired minimal inhibitory concentrations at this level. Thus, the Prompt inocula were found to give results equivalent to those obtained from inocula prepared by conventional procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6885994      PMCID: PMC270748          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.84-91.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Inoculum standardization in antimicrobial susceptibility testing: evaluation of overnight agar cultures and the Rapid Inoculum Standardization System.

Authors:  C N Baker; C Thornsberry; R W Hawkinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid inoculum standardization system: a novel device for standardization of inocula in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J H Wicks; R L Nelson; G E Krejcarek
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of a rapid inoculum preparation method for agar disk diffusion susceptibility testing.

Authors:  R F D'Amato; L Hochstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Microdilution antibiotic susceptibility test: examination of certain variables.

Authors:  R C Tilton; L Lieberman; E H Gerlach
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-11

5.  Comparison and evaluation of carbenicillin disks in diffusion susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J M Matsen; M E Lund; D C Brooker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Validation of the automated reading and incubation system with Sensititre plates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Kimberle C Chapin; Michael C Musgnug
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of the prompt system in identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates.

Authors:  B Flejzor; V D Bokkenheuser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by two methods of inoculum preparation.

Authors:  A M Bourgault; F Lamothe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L Burmeister; M S Bartlett; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Stability of viable-bacterium counts in liquid media used for preparation of inocula and subsequent impact on antimicrobial susceptibility test results.

Authors:  J A Hindler; A H Gonzalez; T A Drake
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Antibacterial small molecules targeting the conserved TOPRIM domain of DNA gyrase.

Authors:  Scott S Walker; Marc Labroli; Ronald E Painter; Judyann Wiltsie; Brad Sherborne; Nicholas Murgolo; Xinwei Sher; Paul Mann; Paul Zuck; Charles G Garlisi; Jing Su; Stacia Kargman; Li Xiao; Giovanna Scapin; Scott Salowe; Kristine Devito; Payal Sheth; Nichole Buist; Christopher M Tan; Todd A Black; Terry Roemer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.