Literature DB >> 8904400

Susceptibility testing of fungi: current status of correlation of in vitro data with clinical outcome.

M A Ghannoum1, J H Rex, J N Galgiani.   

Abstract

In summary, it is clear that in vitro susceptibility testing can predict outcome in selected clinical situations. The clearest data are from the fluconazole-treated AIDS patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. In this setting, the homogeneity of the underlying immune defect, combined with the ease of identification and monitoring of the infection, creates a near-perfect test situation. In more complex scenarios, such as the heterogeneous population of patients enrolled in a recent study of candidemia, no such clear-cut correlation was present. The importance of host factors in the correlation of the MIC with outcome cannot be overemphasized. Examples of these parameters include patient status (underlying disease, the presence of intravascular catheters, and CD4+ T-cell number), drug pharmacokinetics (absorption and distribution), patient compliance, and drug-drug interactions. Identification of relevant factors can substantially improve the degree of the MIC-outcome correlation and thus improve the clinical utility of in vitro testing. An important feature in this entire process is the role of standardized susceptibility testing procedures. While not without flaws, the proposed NCCLS reference method has been invaluable in allowing multiple investigators to contribute data that can be used to clarify the correlation between the fluconazole MIC and outcome. While the development of simplified second-generation methods is eagerly anticipated, the role of the reference method as a common touchstone is critical. Only by use of either the reference method itself or methods with a known relationship to the reference method can this broad collaborative process really proceed. Current work is focusing on defining interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida species, refinement of the in vitro procedures used to measure susceptibility to amphotericin B, ketoconazole, and itraconazole, and the acquisition of a broad base of data on the relationship between the MIC and outcome for these three drugs. Although considerable work remains to be done, the available data suggest that solutions to each of these problems are possible and that routine susceptibility testing of fungi will become meaningful for clinical decision making in the foreseeable future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8904400      PMCID: PMC228832          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.489-495.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  79 in total

1.  Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; C W Kish; T M Kerkering; R A Fromtling; K Bartizal; J N Galgiani; K Villareal; M A Pfaller; T Gerarden; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Fluconazole resistance in AIDS patients.

Authors:  L Willocks; C L Leen; R P Brettle; D Urquhart; T B Russell; L J Milne
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans after long-term suppressive therapy.

Authors:  A Sanguineti; J K Carmichael; K Campbell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-05-10

4.  Development of resistance in candida isolates from patients receiving prolonged antifungal therapy.

Authors:  P Fan-Havard; D Capano; S M Smith; A Mangia; R H Eng
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Disseminated candidiasis due to amphotericin B-resistant Candida albicans.

Authors:  J Conly; R Rennie; J Johnson; S Farah; L Hellman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Fluconazole and ketoconazole in the treatment of oral and esophageal candidiasis in AIDS patients.

Authors:  F Barchiesi; A Giacometti; D Arzeni; P Branchesi; G Crescenzi; F Ancarani; G Scalise
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.714

7.  Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts.

Authors:  R A Fromtling; J N Galgiani; M A Pfaller; A Espinel-Ingroff; K F Bartizal; M S Bartlett; B A Body; C Frey; G Hall; G D Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans: a microdilution technique.

Authors:  M A Ghannoum; A S Ibrahim; Y Fu; M C Shafiq; J E Edwards; R S Criddle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  [Treatment and secondary prophylaxis with fluconazole for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients. A mycological analysis of failures].

Authors:  J Reynes; M Mallié; D André; F Janbon; J M Bastide
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1992-05

10.  Collaborative investigation of broth microdilution and semisolid agar dilution for in vitro susceptibility testing of Candida albicans.

Authors:  R Shawar; V Paetznick; Z Witte; L G Ensign; E Anaissie; M LaRocco
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of fungal resistance: an overview.

Authors:  Maher M Balkis; Steven D Leidich; Pranab K Mukherjee; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole by flow cytometry correlates with clinical outcome.

Authors:  C Wenisch; C B Moore; R Krause; E Presterl; P Pichna; D W Denning
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges.

Authors:  J H Rex; M A Pfaller; T J Walsh; V Chaturvedi; A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Ghannoum; L L Gosey; F C Odds; M G Rinaldi; D J Sheehan; D W Warnock
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparative evaluation of PASCO and national committee for clinical laboratory standards M27-A broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of yeasts.

Authors:  B A Arthington-Skaggs; M Motley; D W Warnock; C J Morrison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Trends in antifungal susceptibility among Candida sp. Urinary isolates from 1994 and 1998.

Authors:  J Baran; E Klauber; J Barczak; K Riederer; R Khatib
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Early presumptive therapy with fluconazole for occult Candida infection after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Yan-Shen Shan; Edgar D Sy; Shan-Tair Wang; Jenq-Chang Lee; Pin-Wen Lin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Evaluation of the E test for fluconazole susceptibility testing of Candida albicans isolates from oropharyngeal candidiasis.

Authors:  E Dannaoui; S Colin; J Pichot; M A Piens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance.

Authors:  T C White; K A Marr; R A Bowden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Detection of fluconazole-resistant isolates of Candida glabrata by using an agar screen assay.

Authors:  Susan M Nelson; Charles P Cartwright
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Current and emerging azole antifungal agents.

Authors:  D J Sheehan; C A Hitchcock; C M Sibley
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.