Literature DB >> 30487127

Residual Tumor Volume, Cell Volume Fraction, and Tumor Cell Kill During Fractionated Chemoradiation Therapy of Human Glioblastoma using Quantitative Sodium MR Imaging.

Keith R Thulborn1, Aiming Lu2, Ian C Atkinson2, Mohan Pauliah3, Kathryn Beal4, Timothy A Chan4, Antonio Omuro5, Josh Yamada4, Michelle S Bradbury3,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spatial and temporal patterns of response of human glioblastoma to fractionated chemoradiation are described by changes in the bioscales of residual tumor volume (RTV), tumor cell volume fraction (CVF), and tumor cell kill (TCK), as derived from tissue sodium concentration (TSC) measured by quantitative sodium MRI at 3 Tesla. These near real-time patterns during treatment are compared with overall survival. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Bioscales were mapped during fractionated chemoradiation therapy in patients with glioblastomas (n = 20) using TSC obtained from serial quantitative sodium MRI at 3 Tesla and a two-compartment model of tissue sodium distribution. The responses of these parameters in newly diagnosed human glioblastomas undergoing treatment were compared with time-to-disease progression and survival.
RESULTS: RTV following tumor resection showed decreased CVF due to disruption of normal cell packing by edema and infiltrating tumor cells. CVF showed either increases back toward normal as infiltrating tumor cells were killed, or decreases as cancer cells continued to infiltrate and extend tumor margins. These highly variable tumor responses showed no correlation with time-to-progression or overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: These bioscales indicate that fractionated chemoradiotherapy of glioblastomas produces variable responses with low cell killing efficiency. These parameters are sensitive to real-time changes within the treatment volume while remaining stable elsewhere, highlighting the potential to individualize therapy earlier in management, should alternative strategies be available. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30487127      PMCID: PMC7462306          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

1.  Clinical rationale for very-high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K R Thulborn
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-02

2.  Comprehensive MR imaging protocol for stroke management: tissue sodium concentration as a measure of tissue viability in nonhuman primate studies and in clinical studies.

Authors:  K R Thulborn; T S Gindin; D Davis; P Erb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Quantitative sodium MRI of the human brain at 9.4 T provides assessment of tissue sodium concentration and cell volume fraction during normal aging.

Authors:  Keith Thulborn; Elaine Lui; Jonathan Guntin; Saad Jamil; Ziqi Sun; Theodore C Claiborne; Ian C Atkinson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Quantitative sodium imaging with a flexible twisted projection pulse sequence.

Authors:  Aiming Lu; Ian C Atkinson; Theodore C Claiborne; Frederick C Damen; Keith R Thulborn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1.

Authors:  Roel G W Verhaak; Katherine A Hoadley; Elizabeth Purdom; Victoria Wang; Yuan Qi; Matthew D Wilkerson; C Ryan Miller; Li Ding; Todd Golub; Jill P Mesirov; Gabriele Alexe; Michael Lawrence; Michael O'Kelly; Pablo Tamayo; Barbara A Weir; Stacey Gabriel; Wendy Winckler; Supriya Gupta; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S Feiler; J Graeme Hodgson; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria; Cameron Brennan; Ari Kahn; Paul T Spellman; Richard K Wilson; Terence P Speed; Joe W Gray; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Targeting adaptive glioblastoma: an overview of proliferation and invasion.

Authors:  Qian Xie; Sandeep Mittal; Michael E Berens
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Quantitative tissue sodium concentration mapping of normal rat brain.

Authors:  J D Christensen; B J Barrère; F E Boada; J M Vevea; K R Thulborn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  In vivo NMR imaging of sodium-23 in the human head.

Authors:  S K Hilal; A A Maudsley; J B Ra; H E Simon; P Roschmann; S Wittekoek; Z H Cho; S K Mun
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Measurement of the extracellular space in brain tumors using 76Br-bromide and PET.

Authors:  Matthias Bruehlmeier; Ulrich Roelcke; Peter Bläuenstein; John Missimer; Pius A Schubiger; Johannes Th Locher; Raimo Pellikka; Simon M Ametamey
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Current data and strategy in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Gabriel Iacob; Eduard B Dinca
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Sodium homeostasis in the tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  Theresa K Leslie; Andrew D James; Fulvio Zaccagna; James T Grist; Surrin Deen; Aneurin Kennerley; Frank Riemer; Joshua D Kaggie; Ferdia A Gallagher; Fiona J Gilbert; William J Brackenbury
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 10.680

2.  Imaging the transmembrane and transendothelial sodium gradients in gliomas.

Authors:  Muhammad H Khan; John J Walsh; Jelena M Mihailović; Sandeep K Mishra; Daniel Coman; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Assessment of Sodium MRI at 7 Tesla as Predictor of Therapy Response and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients.

Authors:  Daniel Paech; Sebastian Regnery; Tanja Platt; Nicolas G R Behl; Nina Weckesser; Paul Windisch; Katerina Deike-Hofmann; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Stefan Rieken; Laila König; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Jürgen Debus; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 2: Spectroscopy, Chemical Exchange Saturation, Multiparametric Imaging, and Radiomics.

Authors:  Thomas C Booth; Evita C Wiegers; Esther A H Warnert; Kathleen M Schmainda; Frank Riemer; Ruben E Nechifor; Vera C Keil; Gilbert Hangel; Patrícia Figueiredo; Maria Del Mar Álvarez-Torres; Otto M Henriksen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Giant Pediatric Supratentorial Tumor: Clinical Feature and Surgical Strategy.

Authors:  Zhong-Ding Zhang; Huang-Yi Fang; Chen Pang; Yue Yang; Shi-Ze Li; Ling-Li Zhou; Guang-Hui Bai; Han-Song Sheng
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 6.  [Perspectives of X-nuclei magnetic resonance imaging in neuro-oncology].

Authors:  Sebastian Regnery; Tanja Platt
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Ultra-high-field sodium MRI as biomarker for tumor extent, grade and IDH mutation status in glioma patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Regnery; Nicolas G R Behl; Tanja Platt; Nina Weinfurtner; Paul Windisch; Katerina Deike-Hofmann; Felix Sahm; Martin Bendszus; Jürgen Debus; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Rieken; Sebastian Adeberg; Daniel Paech
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 8.  23 Na-MRI as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Authors:  Linda Osei Poku; M Phil; Yongna Cheng; Kai Wang; Xilin Sun
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Detection of early changes in the post-radiosurgery vestibular schwannoma microenvironment using multinuclear MRI.

Authors:  Daniel Lewis; Damien J McHugh; Ka-Loh Li; Xiaoping Zhu; Catherine Mcbain; Simon K Lloyd; Alan Jackson; Omar N Pathmanaban; Andrew T King; David J Coope
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sodium Intensity Changes Differ Between Relaxation- and Density-Weighted MRI in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Robert Stobbe; Annie Boyd; Penelope Smyth; Derek Emery; Diana Valdés Cabrera; Christian Beaulieu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.