Literature DB >> 34924945

Assessment of Sodium MRI at 7 Tesla as Predictor of Therapy Response and Survival in Glioblastoma Patients.

Daniel Paech1, Sebastian Regnery2,3, Tanja Platt4, Nicolas G R Behl4,5, Nina Weckesser1, Paul Windisch2, Katerina Deike-Hofmann1, Wolfgang Wick6, Martin Bendszus7, Stefan Rieken2,3, Laila König2,3, Mark E Ladd4,8, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer1, Jürgen Debus2,3, Sebastian Adeberg2,3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to prospectively investigate sodium (23Na) MRI at 7 Tesla (T) as predictor of therapy response and survival in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Thus, 20 GBM patients underwent 23Na MRI at 7T before, immediately after and 6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The median tissue sodium concentration (TSC) inside the whole tumor excluding necrosis was determined. Initial response to CRT was assessed employing the updated response assessment in neuro-oncology working group (RANO) criteria. Clinical parameters, baseline TSC and longitudinal TSC differences were compared between patients with initial progressive disease (PD) and patients with initial stable disease (SD) using Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney-U-tests. Univariate proportional hazard models for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using clinical parameters and TSC metrics as predictor variables. The analyses demonstrated that TSC developed heterogeneously over all patients following CRT. None of the TSC metrics differed significantly between cases of initial SD and initial PD. Furthermore, TSC metrics did not yield a significant association with PFS or OS. Conversely, the initial response according to the RANO criteria could significantly predict PFS [univariate HR (95%CI) = 0.02 (0.0001-0.21), p < 0.001] and OS [univariate HR = 0.17 (0.04-0.65), p = 0.005]. In conclusion, TSC showed treatment-related changes in GBM following CRT, but did not significantly correlate with the initial response according to the RANO criteria, PFS or OS. In contrast, the initial response according to the RANO criteria was a significant predictor of PFS and OS. Future investigations need to elucidate the reasons for treatment-related changes in TSC and their clinical value for response prediction in glioblastoma patients receiving CRT.
Copyright © 2021 Paech, Regnery, Platt, Behl, Weckesser, Windisch, Deike-Hofmann, Wick, Bendszus, Rieken, König, Ladd, Schlemmer, Debus and Adeberg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain neoplasm/secondary cases; glioblastoma; magnetic resonance imaging; response assessment; sodium MRI; ultra-high field (7 tesla)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34924945      PMCID: PMC8671745          DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.782516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-453X            Impact factor:   4.677


  32 in total

1.  Three-dimensional dictionary-learning reconstruction of (23)Na MRI data.

Authors:  Nicolas G R Behl; Christine Gnahm; Peter Bachert; Mark E Ladd; Armin M Nagel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advances : 10 years of open-source development.

Authors:  Marco Nolden; Sascha Zelzer; Alexander Seitel; Diana Wald; Michael Müller; Alfred M Franz; Daniel Maleike; Markus Fangerau; Matthias Baumhauer; Lena Maier-Hein; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Ivo Wolf
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Proton and sodium MRI assessment of emerging tumor chemotherapeutic resistance.

Authors:  Victor D Schepkin; Kuei C Lee; Kyle Kuszpit; Mukilan Muthuswami; Timothy D Johnson; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Combined imaging biomarkers for therapy evaluation in glioblastoma multiforme: correlating sodium MRI and F-18 FLT PET on a voxel-wise basis.

Authors:  Charles M Laymon; Matthew J Oborski; Vincent K Lee; Denise K Davis; Erik C Wiener; Frank S Lieberman; Fernando E Boada; James M Mountz
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Intracellular concentration of sodium and other elements as related to mitogenesis and oncogenesis in vivo.

Authors:  I L Cameron; N K Smith; T B Pool; R L Sparks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Experimental and human brain neoplasms: detection with in vivo sodium MR imaging.

Authors:  P A Turski; L W Houston; W H Perman; J K Hald; D Turski; C M Strother; J F Sackett
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Tissue sodium concentration in human brain tumors as measured with 23Na MR imaging.

Authors:  Ronald Ouwerkerk; Karen B Bleich; Joseph S Gillen; Martin G Pomper; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Imaging of sodium in the brain: a brief review.

Authors:  N Jon Shah; Wieland A Worthoff; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Ultra-high-field sodium MRI as biomarker for tumor extent, grade and IDH mutation status in glioma patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Regnery; Nicolas G R Behl; Tanja Platt; Nina Weinfurtner; Paul Windisch; Katerina Deike-Hofmann; Felix Sahm; Martin Bendszus; Jürgen Debus; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Rieken; Sebastian Adeberg; Daniel Paech
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ultra-High-Field MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Gliomas: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Annabelle Shaffer; Susanna S Kwok; Anant Naik; Aaron T Anderson; Fan Lam; Tracey Wszalek; Paul M Arnold; Wael Hassaneen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 2.  High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers: A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 2: Spectroscopy, Chemical Exchange Saturation, Multiparametric Imaging, and Radiomics.

Authors:  Thomas C Booth; Evita C Wiegers; Esther A H Warnert; Kathleen M Schmainda; Frank Riemer; Ruben E Nechifor; Vera C Keil; Gilbert Hangel; Patrícia Figueiredo; Maria Del Mar Álvarez-Torres; Otto M Henriksen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.