UNLABELLED: Brain edema significantly contributes to the clinical course of human brain tumor patients. There is evidence that an enlargement of the extracellular space (ECS) is involved in the development of brain edema. Although T2-weighted magnetic resonance (T2-MR) images represent brain edema by its increased water content, they do not differentiate ECS enlargement from increased intracellular water content. METHODS: On the basis of the known distribution of bromide in the ECS, we used (76)Br-bromide and PET to measure the regional ECS in 9 brain tumor patients. Transport rate constants and the distribution volume (DV) of (76)Br-bromide in normal brain and tumor were derived from dynamic PET scans and the measured (76)Br-bromide concentration in arterial plasma. We evaluated different models regarding their reliability in estimating the ECS. RESULTS: Assuming that the DV of (76)Br-bromide represents the ECS, robust estimates were possible for all investigated regions. In normal brain, ECS was within a narrow range-for example, occipital lobe, 19.9% +/- 3.1%-and was lower in 2 dexamethasone-treated patients compared with untreated patients. In 7 of 9 tumors, increased ECS ranged between 43.8% and 61.1%. ECS increases were confined to the tumor mass and did not extend into peritumoral edematous brain. Two patients with large hyperintense lesions according to T2-MR images showed normal ECS values within the lesion. CONCLUSION: (76)Br-Bromide PET allows a quantitative measurement of the ECS in brain edema and in normal brain. The discrepancies between lesions shown by T2-MRI and regional ECS enlargement as measured with PET challenge the concept of tumor-induced brain edema.
UNLABELLED: Brain edema significantly contributes to the clinical course of humanbrain tumorpatients. There is evidence that an enlargement of the extracellular space (ECS) is involved in the development of brain edema. Although T2-weighted magnetic resonance (T2-MR) images represent brain edema by its increased water content, they do not differentiate ECS enlargement from increased intracellular water content. METHODS: On the basis of the known distribution of bromide in the ECS, we used (76)Br-bromide and PET to measure the regional ECS in 9 brain tumorpatients. Transport rate constants and the distribution volume (DV) of (76)Br-bromide in normal brain and tumor were derived from dynamic PET scans and the measured (76)Br-bromide concentration in arterial plasma. We evaluated different models regarding their reliability in estimating the ECS. RESULTS: Assuming that the DV of (76)Br-bromide represents the ECS, robust estimates were possible for all investigated regions. In normal brain, ECS was within a narrow range-for example, occipital lobe, 19.9% +/- 3.1%-and was lower in 2 dexamethasone-treated patients compared with untreated patients. In 7 of 9 tumors, increased ECS ranged between 43.8% and 61.1%. ECS increases were confined to the tumor mass and did not extend into peritumoral edematous brain. Two patients with large hyperintense lesions according to T2-MR images showed normal ECS values within the lesion. CONCLUSION: (76)Br-Bromide PET allows a quantitative measurement of the ECS in brain edema and in normal brain. The discrepancies between lesions shown by T2-MRI and regional ECS enlargement as measured with PET challenge the concept of tumor-induced brain edema.
Authors: James R Ewing; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Madhava P Aryal; Kelly A Keenan; Rasha Elmghirbi; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Swayamprava Panda; Mei Lu; Tom Mikkelsen; Glauber Cabral; Stephen L Brown Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Keith R Thulborn; Aiming Lu; Ian C Atkinson; Mohan Pauliah; Kathryn Beal; Timothy A Chan; Antonio Omuro; Josh Yamada; Michelle S Bradbury Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wilson B Chwang; Rajan Jain; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; A S M Iskander; Ashley VanSlooten; Lonni Schultz; Ali S Arbab; James R Ewing Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christopher Beadle; Marcela C Assanah; Pascale Monzo; Richard Vallee; Steven S Rosenfeld; Peter Canoll Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Maria Cristina Colombo; Chiara Giverso; Elena Faggiano; Carlo Boffano; Francesco Acerbi; Pasquale Ciarletta Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sebastian Regnery; Nicolas G R Behl; Tanja Platt; Nina Weinfurtner; Paul Windisch; Katerina Deike-Hofmann; Felix Sahm; Martin Bendszus; Jürgen Debus; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Rieken; Sebastian Adeberg; Daniel Paech Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 4.881