Joshua R Ehrlich1,2, Brian C Stagg1,3, Chris Andrews1, Abigail Kumagai1, David C Musch1,2,4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 3. National Clinician Scholars Program, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
Importance: Vision impairment (VI), including blindness, affects hundreds of millions globally, and 90% of those with VI live in low- and middle-income countries. Cross-national comparisons are important to elucidate the unique and shared factors associated with VI and receipt of eye care in different countries and to target those most in need. Objective: To identify the characteristics associated with VI and receipt of eye care in a sample of low- and middle-income countries. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this study of cross-sectional survey data from wave 1 of the World Health Organization Study on Global Aging and Adult Health, data on sociodemographic characteristics and health were collected from nationally representative samples in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa from 2007 to 2010. Probability sampling with multistage, stratified, random-cluster samples was used to identify households and participants. The survey was completed by 34 159 adults 50 years and older. Data were analyzed from December 2017 to February 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: We analyzed associations of individual-level and household-level covariates with 3 primary outcomes: distance VI (visual acuity worse than 6/18 in the better-seeing eye), near VI (visual acuity worse than 6/18 in the better-seeing eye), and receipt of an eye examination within the previous 2 years. Results: The study sample in China consisted of 13 350 participants (50.2% female; mean [SD] age, 62.6 [9.0] years); in Ghana, 4725 participants (50.4% female; mean [SD] age, 64.2 [10.8] years); in India, 7150 participants (48.9% female; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [9.0] years); in Mexico, 2103 participants (52.3% female; mean [SD] age, 69.2 [9.2] years); in Russia, 3763 participants (61.1% female; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [10.4] years); and in South Africa, 3838 participants (55.9% female; mean [SD] age 61.6 [9.5]) (all demographic characteristics weighted to reflect respective populations). The weighted proportion of the study sample with distance VI ranged from 9.9% (95% CI, 9.3-10.5) in China to 25.4% (95% CI, 22.0-29.2) in Russia; near VI, from 28.5% (95% CI, 26.9-30.1) in Ghana to 43.1% (95% CI, 41.1-45.1) in India; and receipt of a recent eye examination, from 15.0% (95% CI, 13.8-16.2) in Ghana to 53.1% (95% CI, 49.3-56.8) in Russia. Educational attainment, medical comorbidities, and memory were significantly associated with all outcomes across most low- and middle-income countries. Female sex, low household wealth, food insecurity, no health insurance, rurality, disability, being unmarried, and low social participation were significantly associated with adverse vision-related outcomes, though less consistently. Conclusions and Relevance: There are both common and unique characteristics associated with VI and receipt of eye care across low- and middle-income countries. Our findings suggest that recognizing these factors is important to identify those most at risk and allocate resources optimally. Additional local epidemiological studies are needed.
Importance: Vision impairment (VI), including blindness, affects hundreds of millions globally, and 90% of those with VI live in low- and middle-income countries. Cross-national comparisons are important to elucidate the unique and shared factors associated with VI and receipt of eye care in different countries and to target those most in need. Objective: To identify the characteristics associated with VI and receipt of eye care in a sample of low- and middle-income countries. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this study of cross-sectional survey data from wave 1 of the World Health Organization Study on Global Aging and Adult Health, data on sociodemographic characteristics and health were collected from nationally representative samples in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa from 2007 to 2010. Probability sampling with multistage, stratified, random-cluster samples was used to identify households and participants. The survey was completed by 34 159 adults 50 years and older. Data were analyzed from December 2017 to February 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: We analyzed associations of individual-level and household-level covariates with 3 primary outcomes: distance VI (visual acuity worse than 6/18 in the better-seeing eye), near VI (visual acuity worse than 6/18 in the better-seeing eye), and receipt of an eye examination within the previous 2 years. Results: The study sample in China consisted of 13 350 participants (50.2% female; mean [SD] age, 62.6 [9.0] years); in Ghana, 4725 participants (50.4% female; mean [SD] age, 64.2 [10.8] years); in India, 7150 participants (48.9% female; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [9.0] years); in Mexico, 2103 participants (52.3% female; mean [SD] age, 69.2 [9.2] years); in Russia, 3763 participants (61.1% female; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [10.4] years); and in South Africa, 3838 participants (55.9% female; mean [SD] age 61.6 [9.5]) (all demographic characteristics weighted to reflect respective populations). The weighted proportion of the study sample with distance VI ranged from 9.9% (95% CI, 9.3-10.5) in China to 25.4% (95% CI, 22.0-29.2) in Russia; near VI, from 28.5% (95% CI, 26.9-30.1) in Ghana to 43.1% (95% CI, 41.1-45.1) in India; and receipt of a recent eye examination, from 15.0% (95% CI, 13.8-16.2) in Ghana to 53.1% (95% CI, 49.3-56.8) in Russia. Educational attainment, medical comorbidities, and memory were significantly associated with all outcomes across most low- and middle-income countries. Female sex, low household wealth, food insecurity, no health insurance, rurality, disability, being unmarried, and low social participation were significantly associated with adverse vision-related outcomes, though less consistently. Conclusions and Relevance: There are both common and unique characteristics associated with VI and receipt of eye care across low- and middle-income countries. Our findings suggest that recognizing these factors is important to identify those most at risk and allocate resources optimally. Additional local epidemiological studies are needed.
Authors: W Jack Rejeski; Edward H Ip; Anthony P Marsh; Michael E Miller; Deborah F Farmer Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.730
Authors: Mireya Zamora-Macorra; Elga Filipa Amorin de Castro; José Alberto Ávila-Funes; Betty Soledad Manrique-Espinoza; Ruy López-Ridaura; Ana Luisa Sosa-Ortiz; Pamela L Shields; Daniel Samano Martin Del Campo Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: David S Tulsky; Noelle Carlozzi; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; Jennifer L Beaumont; Pamela A Kisala; Dan Mungas; Kevin Conway; Richard Gershon Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Solange R Salomão; Rafael W Cinoto; Adriana Berezovsky; Luana Mendieta; Célia R Nakanami; César Lipener; Emílio de Haro Muñoz; Fabio Ejzenbaum; Rubens Belfort; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rupert R A Bourne; Seth R Flaxman; Tasanee Braithwaite; Maria V Cicinelli; Aditi Das; Jost B Jonas; Jill Keeffe; John H Kempen; Janet Leasher; Hans Limburg; Kovin Naidoo; Konrad Pesudovs; Serge Resnikoff; Alex Silvester; Gretchen A Stevens; Nina Tahhan; Tien Y Wong; Hugh R Taylor Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Sukumar Vellakkal; S V Subramanian; Christopher Millett; Sanjay Basu; David Stuckler; Shah Ebrahim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lee Smith; Jae Il Shin; Louis Jacob; Guillermo F López-Sánchez; Hans Oh; Yvonne Barnett; Shahina Pardhan; Laurie Butler; Pinar Soysal; Nicola Veronese; Ai Koyanagi Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Louis Jacob; Karel Kostev; Lee Smith; Guillermo F López-Sánchez; Shahina Pardhan; Hans Oh; Jae Il Shin; Adel S Abduljabbar; Josep Maria Haro; Ai Koyanagi Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Joshua R Ehrlich; H Jeyaseeli Flora; Brian C Stagg; B Vengadesh; Gabrielle Willey; Ashok Vardhan S Journal: Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) Date: 2020 Sep-Oct