PURPOSE: Assess prevalence and causes of vision impairment among low-middle income school children in São Paulo. METHODS: Cluster sampling was used to obtain a random sample of children ages 11 to 14 years from public schools (grades 5-8) in three districts from June to November 2005. The examination included visual acuity testing, ocular motility, and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, and media. Cycloplegic refraction and fundus examination were performed in children with uncorrected visual acuity 20/40 or worse in either eye. A principal cause of visual impairment was determined for eyes with uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or worse. RESULTS: A total of 2825 children were enumerated and 2441 (86.4%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best-corrected visual acuity 20/40 or worse in the better eye was 4.82%, 2.67%, and 0.41%, respectively. Spectacles were used by 144 (5.9%) children. Refractive error was a cause in 76.8% of children with visual impairment in one or both eyes; amblyopia, 11.4%; retinal disorders, 5.9%; other causes, 2.7%; and unexplained causes, 7.7%. Myopic visual impairment (spherical equivalent -0.50 D in one or both eyes) was not associated with age or grade level, but female sex was marginally significant (P = 0.070). Hyperopic visual impairment (+2.00 D or more) was not associated with age, grade level, or sex. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of reduced vision in low-middle income urban São Paulo school children was low, most of it because of uncorrected refractive error. Cost-effective strategies are needed to address this easily treated cause of vision impairment.
PURPOSE: Assess prevalence and causes of vision impairment among low-middle income school children in São Paulo. METHODS: Cluster sampling was used to obtain a random sample of children ages 11 to 14 years from public schools (grades 5-8) in three districts from June to November 2005. The examination included visual acuity testing, ocular motility, and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, and media. Cycloplegic refraction and fundus examination were performed in children with uncorrected visual acuity 20/40 or worse in either eye. A principal cause of visual impairment was determined for eyes with uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or worse. RESULTS: A total of 2825 children were enumerated and 2441 (86.4%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best-corrected visual acuity 20/40 or worse in the better eye was 4.82%, 2.67%, and 0.41%, respectively. Spectacles were used by 144 (5.9%) children. Refractive error was a cause in 76.8% of children with visual impairment in one or both eyes; amblyopia, 11.4%; retinal disorders, 5.9%; other causes, 2.7%; and unexplained causes, 7.7%. Myopic visual impairment (spherical equivalent -0.50 D in one or both eyes) was not associated with age or grade level, but female sex was marginally significant (P = 0.070). Hyperopic visual impairment (+2.00 D or more) was not associated with age, grade level, or sex. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of reduced vision in low-middle income urban São Paulo school children was low, most of it because of uncorrected refractive error. Cost-effective strategies are needed to address this easily treated cause of vision impairment.
Authors: G V S Murthy; Sanjeev K Gupta; Leon B Ellwein; Sergio R Muñoz; Gopal P Pokharel; Lalit Sanga; Damodar Bachani Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kovin S Naidoo; Avesh Raghunandan; Khathutshelo P Mashige; Pirindhavellie Govender; Brien A Holden; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Lisa A Jones; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Gladys L Mitchell; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yuddha D Sapkota; Bishwa Nath Adhikari; Gopal P Pokharel; Bimal K Poudyal; Leon B Ellwein Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.648
Authors: Isabel Signes-Soler; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel Angel Estrella Lumeras; Elena Tomás Verduras; David P Piñero Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-03-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Wujiao Wang; Lu Zhu; Shijie Zheng; Yan Ji; Yongguo Xiang; Bingjing Lv; Liang Xiong; Zhuoyu Li; Shenglan Yi; Hongyun Huang; Li Zhang; Fangli Liu; Wenjuan Wan; Ke Hu Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-04-28
Authors: Ferdinand C Maduka-Okafor; Obiekwe Okoye; Ifeoma Ezegwui; Ngozi C Oguego; Onochie I Okoye; Nnenma Udeh; Ada E Aghaji; Emmanuel Nwobi; Chiamaka Aneji; Ernest Onwasigwe; Rich E Umeh Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2021-06-04
Authors: Jian Feng Wu; Hong Sheng Bi; Shu Mei Wang; Yuan Yuan Hu; Hui Wu; Wei Sun; Tai Liang Lu; Xing Rong Wang; Jost B Jonas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240