Literature DB >> 3047567

Current status of cytogenetic procedures to detect and quantify previous exposures to radiation.

M A Bender1, A A Awa, A L Brooks, H J Evans, P G Groer, L G Littlefield, C Pereira, R J Preston, B W Wachholz.   

Abstract

The estimation of the magnitude of a dose of ionizing radiation to which an individual has been exposed (or of the plausibility of an alleged exposure) from chromosomal aberration frequencies determined in peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures is a well-established methodology, having first been employed over 25 years ago. The cytogenetics working group has reviewed the accumulated data and the possible applicability of the technique to the determination of radiation doses to which American veterans might have been exposed as participants in nuclear weapons tests in the continental U.S.A. or the Pacific Atolls during the late 1940s and 1950s or as members of the Occupation Forces entering Hiroshima or Nagasaki shortly after the nuclear detonations there. The working group believes that with prompt peripheral blood sampling, external doses to individuals of the order of about 10 rad (or less if the exposure was to high-LET radiation) can accurately be detected and measured. It also believes that exposures of populations to doses of the order of maximum permissible occupational exposures can also be detected (but only in populations; not in an individual). Large exposures of populations can also be detected even several decades after their exposure, but only in the case of populations, and of large doses (of the order of 100 to several hundred rad). The working group does not believe that cytogenetic measurements can detect internal doses from fallout radionuclides in individuals unless these are very large. The working group has approached the problem of detection of small doses (less than or equal to 10 or so rad) sampled decades after the exposure of individuals by using a Bayesian statistical approach. Only a preliminary evaluation of this approach was possible, but it is clear that it could provide a formal statement of the likelihood that any given observation of a particular number of chromosomal aberrations in a sample of any particular number of lymphocytes actually indicates an exposure to any given dose of radiation. It is also clear that aberration frequencies (and consequently doses) would have to be quite high before much confidence could be given to either exposure or dose estimation by this method, given the approximately 3 decades of elapsed time between the exposures and any future blood sampling.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3047567     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(88)90017-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  33 in total

1.  Verification by the FISH translocation assay of historic doses to Mayak workers from external gamma radiation.

Authors:  Natalia V Sotnik; Tamara V Azizova; Firouz Darroudi; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Jayne E Moquet; Janna Fomina; David C Lloyd; Pat A Hone; Alan A Edwards
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Perumal; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Venkateswarlu Raavi; Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen; Karthik Kanagaraj; Amith Roy Chowdhury; Solomon Fd Paul
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-28

3.  A Bayesian hierarchical method to account for random effects in cytogenetic dosimetry based on calibration curves.

Authors:  Shuhei Mano; Yumiko Suto
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Influence of mitotic delay on the results of biological dosimetry for high doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  A Heimers; H J Brede; U Giesen; W Hoffmann
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Stable and unstable chromosome aberrations measured after occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and ultrasound.

Authors:  Aleksandra Fucić; Davor Zeljezić; Vilena Kasuba; Nevenka Kopjar; Ruzica Rozgaj; Ruzica Lasan; August Mijić; Vlasta Hitrec; Joe Nathan Lucas
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  DOE program--developing a scientific basis for responses to low-dose exposures: impact on dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; Lezlie Couch
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Evolution of DNA damage in irradiated cells.

Authors:  P Hahnfeldt; R K Sachs; L R Hlatky
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Evidence for radiation hormesis after in vitro exposure of human lymphocytes to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Primary DNA damage in peripheral mononuclear blood cells of workers exposed to bitumen-based products.

Authors:  J Fuchs; J G Hengstler; G Boettler; F Oesch
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  No Evidence for the In Vivo Induction of Genomic Instability by Low Doses of CS Gamma Rays in Bone Marrow Cells of BALB/CJ and C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Chatchanok Udomtanakunchai; Louise M Honikel; Elbert B Whorton
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.