Literature DB >> 16273382

Influence of mitotic delay on the results of biological dosimetry for high doses of ionizing radiation.

A Heimers1, H J Brede, U Giesen, W Hoffmann.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate how high doses of sparsely and densely ionizing radiations influence the proliferation time of lymphocytes in short-term cultures and, consequently, the observed frequencies of dicentric and centric ring chromosomes. Peripheral blood samples from five volunteers were irradiated with high doses of 200 kV X-rays and with neutrons with a mean energy of <En>or=2.1 MeV. First division metaphase cells were collected after different culture times of 48, 56, and 72 h and dicentrics, centric ring chromosomes, and acentric fragments were determined. The data hint at considerable mitotic delay. The main increase in the number of chromosome aberrations occurred between 48 and 72 h after an X-ray exposure and between 56 and 72 h after neutron exposure. When the data were used for a calibration of aberration frequency versus dose, subsequent dose estimations resulted, however, in comparable values. Thus, in spite of the influence of mitotic delay on observable chromosome aberrations, at least for the radiation types investigated here, a culture time of 48 h is acceptable for biological dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16273382     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-005-0014-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  28 in total

1.  Complex chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a potential biomarker of exposure to high-LET alpha-particles.

Authors:  R M Anderson; S J Marsden; E G Wright; M A Kadhim; D T Goodhead; C S Griffin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes by in vitro and in vivo X-rays.

Authors:  Heike Schröder; Anna Heimers
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-05-27       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  How radiation-specific is the dicentric assay?

Authors:  W Hoffmann; I Schmitz-Feuerhake
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Current status of cytogenetic procedures to detect and quantify previous exposures to radiation.

Authors:  M A Bender; A A Awa; A L Brooks; H J Evans; P G Groer; L G Littlefield; C Pereira; R J Preston; B W Wachholz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Homogeneous sensitivity of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to radiation-induced chromosome damage.

Authors:  D Scott; C Y Lyons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Frequencies of complex chromosome exchange aberrations induced by 238Pu alpha-particles and detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization using single chromosome-specific probes.

Authors:  C S Griffin; S J Marsden; D L Stevens; P Simpson; J R Savage
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  The effect of x-ray induced mitotic delay on chromosome aberration yields in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  D C Lloyd; G W Dolphin; R J Purrott; P A Tipper
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Influence of radiation quality on the expression of chromosomal damage.

Authors:  S Ritter; E Nasonova; W Kraft-Weyrather; G Kraft
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Transmission of gamma-ray-induced unstable chromosomal aberrations through successive mitotic divisions in human lymphocytes in vitro.

Authors:  A P Krishnaja; N K Sharma
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Cytogenetic effects of densely ionising radiation in human lymphocytes: impact of cell cycle delays.

Authors:  E Nasonova; S Ritter
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

View more
  6 in total

1.  Chromosome aberration analysis and the influence of mitotic delay after simulated partial-body exposure with high doses of sparsely and densely ionising radiation.

Authors:  Anna Heimers; Hein Jürgen Brede; Ulrich Giesen; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Chromosome aberration measurements in mitotic and G2-PCC lymphocytes at the standard sampling time of 48 h underestimate the effectiveness of high-LET particles.

Authors:  Ryonfa Lee; Elena Nasonova; Carola Hartel; Marco Durante; Sylvia Ritter
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  A new model of biodosimetry to integrate low and high doses.

Authors:  Mònica Pujol; Joan-Francesc Barquinero; Pedro Puig; Roser Puig; María Rosa Caballín; Leonardo Barrios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cytogenetically-based biodosimetry after high doses of radiation.

Authors:  Monica Pujol-Canadell; Jay R Perrier; Lidia Cunha; Igor Shuryak; Andrew Harken; Guy Garty; David J Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Investigation of DNA Damage and Cell-Cycle Distribution in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes under Exposure to High Doses of Proton Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Justyna Miszczyk
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03

6.  An updated view into the cell cycle kinetics of human T lymphocytes and the impact of irradiation.

Authors:  Evi Duthoo; Anne Vral; Ans Baeyens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.