Q Zheng1, S L Furth2, G E Tasian3, Y Fan4. 1. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; School of Computer and Control Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, 264005, China. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: yong.fan@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Anatomic characteristics of kidneys derived from ultrasound images are potential biomarkers of children with congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT), but current methods are limited by the lack of automated processes that accurately classify diseased and normal kidneys. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep transfer learning techniques to classify kidneys of normal children and those with CAKUT. STUDY DESIGN: A transfer learning method was developed to extract features of kidneys from ultrasound images obtained during routine clinical care of 50 children with CAKUT and 50 controls. To classify diseased and normal kidneys, support vector machine classifiers were built on the extracted features using (1) transfer learning imaging features from a pretrained deep learning model, (2) conventional imaging features, and (3) their combination. These classifiers were compared, and their diagnosis performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. RESULTS: The AUC for classifiers built on the combination features were 0.92, 0.88, and 0.92 for discriminating the left, right, and bilateral abnormal kidney scans from controls with classification rates of 84%, 81%, and 87%; specificity of 84%, 74%, and 88%; and sensitivity of 85%, 88%, and 86%, respectively. These classifiers performed better than classifiers built on either the transfer learning features or the conventional features alone (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The present study validated transfer learning techniques for imaging feature extraction of ultrasound images to build classifiers for distinguishing children with CAKUT from controls. The experiments have demonstrated that the classifiers built on the transfer learning features and conventional image features could distinguish abnormal kidney images from controls with AUCs greater than 0.88, indicating that classification of ultrasound kidney scans has a great potential to aid kidney disease diagnosis. A limitation of the present study is the moderate number of patients that contributed data to the transfer learning approach. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of transfer learning and conventional imaging features yielded the best classification performance for distinguishing children with CAKUT from controls based on ultrasound images of kidneys.
INTRODUCTION: Anatomic characteristics of kidneys derived from ultrasound images are potential biomarkers of children with congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT), but current methods are limited by the lack of automated processes that accurately classify diseased and normal kidneys. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep transfer learning techniques to classify kidneys of normal children and those with CAKUT. STUDY DESIGN: A transfer learning method was developed to extract features of kidneys from ultrasound images obtained during routine clinical care of 50 children with CAKUT and 50 controls. To classify diseased and normal kidneys, support vector machine classifiers were built on the extracted features using (1) transfer learning imaging features from a pretrained deep learning model, (2) conventional imaging features, and (3) their combination. These classifiers were compared, and their diagnosis performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. RESULTS: The AUC for classifiers built on the combination features were 0.92, 0.88, and 0.92 for discriminating the left, right, and bilateral abnormal kidney scans from controls with classification rates of 84%, 81%, and 87%; specificity of 84%, 74%, and 88%; and sensitivity of 85%, 88%, and 86%, respectively. These classifiers performed better than classifiers built on either the transfer learning features or the conventional features alone (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The present study validated transfer learning techniques for imaging feature extraction of ultrasound images to build classifiers for distinguishing children with CAKUT from controls. The experiments have demonstrated that the classifiers built on the transfer learning features and conventional image features could distinguish abnormal kidney images from controls with AUCs greater than 0.88, indicating that classification of ultrasound kidney scans has a great potential to aid kidney disease diagnosis. A limitation of the present study is the moderate number of patients that contributed data to the transfer learning approach. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of transfer learning and conventional imaging features yielded the best classification performance for distinguishing children with CAKUT from controls based on ultrasound images of kidneys.
Authors: Francesco Ciompi; Bartjan de Hoop; Sarah J van Riel; Kaman Chung; Ernst Th Scholten; Matthijs Oudkerk; Pim A de Jong; Mathias Prokop; Bram van Ginneken Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Timothy L Kline; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Marie E Edwards; Kyongtae T Bae; Alan Yu; Arlene B Chapman; Michal Mrug; Jared J Grantham; Douglas Landsittel; William M Bennett; Bernard F King; Peter C Harris; Vicente E Torres; Bradley J Erickson Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-05-20 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Jose E Pulido; Susan L Furth; Stephen A Zderic; Douglas A Canning; Gregory E Tasian Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Jennifer L Dodson; Judith V Jerry-Fluker; Derek K Ng; Marva Moxey-Mims; George J Schwartz; Vikas R Dharnidharka; Bradley A Warady; Susan L Furth Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Shi Yin; Qinmu Peng; Hongming Li; Zhengqiang Zhang; Xinge You; Katherine Fischer; Susan L Furth; Gregory E Tasian; Yong Fan Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Sangmi Lee; Myeongkyun Kang; Keunho Byeon; Sang Eun Lee; In Ho Lee; Young Ah Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Jung Tak Park Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 4.903