| Literature DB >> 30466235 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To achieve improvements in intramuscular injection, autologous fat grafting, and gluteal artery perforator flaps in infants and children, the relationships of computed tomography (CT)-determined gluteal muscle thickness (MT) and subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCT) with age and body mass index (BMI) were analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: Buttocks; Child; Injections, intramuscular; Surgical flaps
Year: 2018 PMID: 30466235 PMCID: PMC6258979 DOI: 10.5999/aps.2017.01760
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Plast Surg ISSN: 2234-6163
Fig. 1.Schematic of best injection location
This schematic image shows the best injection location to provide sufficient thickness while avoiding sciatic nerve injury. The sciatic nerve passes through the lower medial quadrant. The best location is superior to a line extending between the posterior superior iliac spine and the tip of the greater trochanter.
Fig. 2.CT image showing DG landmarks
A computed tomographic (CT) image demonstrates the locations of landmarks for dorsogluteal (DG) subcutaneous tissue and muscle thickness measurements. Yellow dotted line A represents DG muscle thickness. White dotted line B represents DG subcutaneous tissue thickness.
Fig. 3.CT images showing VG landmarks
A computed tomographic (CT) image demonstrates the locations of landmarks for ventrogluteal (VG) subcutaneous tissue and muscle thickness measurements. Yellow dotted line A represents VG muscle thickness. White dotted line B represents VG subcutaneous tissue thickness.
General characteristics of the participants and comparisons of SCT and MT at ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites between age groups
| Age (yr) | Sex | Weight (kg) | Height (m) | BMI (kg/m2) | VG | DG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | SCT | MT | SCT | MT | ||||
| 0 | 37 | 13 | 7.89 ± 2.18 | 67.15 ± 7.87 | 17.24 ± 3.02 | 17.83 ± 9.66a | 17.39 ± 3.41a | 20.94 ± 7.84a | 16.69 ± 5.40a |
| 1 | 28 | 22 | 10.70 ± 1.96 | 82.82 ± 9.16 | 15.79 ± 3.11 | 12.63 ± 3.79b | 18.87 ± 3.56b | 22.31 ± 9.34b | 17.47 ± 4.36b |
| 2 | 21 | 29 | 12.99 ± 1.70 | 91.26 ± 8.22 | 15.81 ± 2.50 | 12.82 ± 4.74c | 19.47 ± 2.93c | 24.84 ± 9.45c | 18.50 ± 4.53c |
| 3 | 24 | 26 | 17.12 ± 2.57 | 104.18 ± 4.26 | 15.79 ± 2.36 | 11.44 ± 4.20d | 19.08 ± 4.39d | 23.70 ± 7.26d | 21.45 ± 6.30d |
| 4 | 37 | 13 | 20.12 ± 4.82 | 108.13 ± 8.31 | 17.19 ± 3.56 | 12.17 ± 5.87e | 12.17 ± 5.87e | 21.47 ± 5.03e | 24.35 ± 8.91e |
| 5 | 29 | 21 | 23.47 ± 4.46 | 114.96 ± 6.99 | 17.82 ± 3.32 | 12.55 ± 5.33f | 12.55 ± 5.33f | 22.48 ± 5.30f | 25.12 ± 9.71f |
| 6 | 28 | 22 | 28.22 ± 6.56 | 124.59 ± 9.53 | 18.14 ± 3.45 | 15.50 ± 6.60g | 15.59 ± 6.60g | 27.68 ± 14.35g | 33.16 ± 11.89g |
| Total | 204 | 146 | 17.22 ± 7.74 | 99.01 ± 19.98 | 16.83 ± 3.19 | 13.57 ± 6.34 | 13.57 ± 6.34 | 20.92 ± 7.34 | 24.92 ± 9.91 |
| F | 7.16 | 13.21 | 8.89 | 27.41 | |||||
| (a>b, a>c, a>d, a>e, a>f, a>g)[ | (g>a, g>b, g>c, g>d, g>e, g>f)[ | (g>a, g>b, g>c, g>d, g>e, g>f)[ | (g>a, g>b, g>c, g>d, g>e, g>f)[ | ||||||
| P-value | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |||||
Values are presented as mean±SD.
BMI, body mass index; VG, ventrogluteal site; DG, dorsogluteal site; SCT, subcutaneous tissue thickness; MT, muscle thickness.
Scheffe test.
Correlation of age with SCT and MT at ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites
| Variable | Site | ρ | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCT | VG | –0.058 | 0.282 |
| DG | 0.500 | < 0.001 | |
| MT | VG | 0.262 | < 0.001 |
| DG | 0.560 | < 0.001 |
Spearman rho correlation coefficients were used to determine correlations between age and subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCT) and muscle thickness (MT) in the ventrogluteal site (VG) and dorsogluteal site (DG) areas. For this, significance was accepted for P-values <0.05 (2-sided test).
Multiple regression equations using multivariate analysis
| Variable | Site | Equation | R2 | β |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCT | VG | y = 1.537 + 0.853 X1 – 0.531 X2 | 0.179 | 0.853 |
| DG | y = 0.531 + 1.176 X1 + 1.151 X2 | 0.229 | 1.176 | |
| MT | VG | y = 8.125 + 0.451 X2 | 0.316 | 0.451 |
| DG | y = 8.869 + 0.326 X2 | 0.320 | 0.326 |
All independent variables (age, sex, height, weight, BMI) were entered into stepwise multiple regression models. In the equation, X1 is the BMI and X2 is age.
BMI, body mass index; SCT, subcutaneous tissue thickness; VG, ventrogluteal site; DG, dorsogluteal site; MT, muscle thickness.
Fig. 4.Correlations of age with SCT and MT
These scatter plots illustrate the correlations of age with subcutaneous tissue thickness (SCT) and muscle thickness (MT) of ventrogluteal (VG) and dorsogluteal (DG) sites with a linear regression line. A significant increasing trend in the relationship between and SCT was observed at DG sites (ρ=0.26, P<0.01). Another significant trend was observed between age and MT at both sites of the buttocks (VG site: ρ=0.50, P<0.01, DG site: ρ=0.56, P<0.01).
Comparison of subcutaneous tissue and muscle thickness between ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites by age group
| Age (yr) | SCT | P-value[ | MT | P-value[ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VG | DG | VG | DG | |||
| 1 | 17.83 ± 9.66 | 20.94 ± 7.84 | 0.059 | 17.39 ± 3.41 | 16.69 ± 5.40 | 0.061 |
| 2 | 12.63 ± 3.79 | 22.31 ± 9.34 | 0.064 | 18.87 ± 3.56 | 17.47 ± 4.36 | 0.079 |
| 3 | 12.82 ± 4.74 | 24.84 ± 9.45 | 0.072 | 19.47 ± 2.93 | 18.50 ± 4.53 | 0.059 |
| 4 | 11.44 ± 4.20 | 23.70 ± 7.26 | 0.052 | 19.08 ± 4.39 | 21.45 ± 6.30 | 0.091 |
| 5 | 12.17 ± 5.87 | 21.47 ± 5.03 | 0.073 | 12.17 ± 5.87 | 24.35 ± 8.91 | 0.052 |
| 6 | 12.55 ± 5.33 | 22.48 ± 5.30 | 0.087 | 12.55 ± 5.33 | 25.12 ± 9.71 | 0.076 |
| 7 | 15.5 ± 6.60 | 27.68 ± 14.35 | 0.066 | 15.59 ± 6.60 | 33.16 ± 11.89 | 0.081 |
| Total | 13.57 ± 6.34 | 20.92 ± 7.34 | 13.57 ± 6.34 | 24.92 ± 9.91 | ||
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
SCT, subcutaneous tissue thickness; MT, muscle thickness; VG, ventrogluteal site; DG, dorsogluteal site.
P<0.001.