Literature DB >> 3046490

National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with the standard multiple tube fermentation method.

S C Edberg1, M J Allen, D B Smith.   

Abstract

A defined substrate method was developed to simultaneously enumerate total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking waters without the need for confirmatory or completed tests. It is a new method based on technology that uses a hydrolyzable substrate as a specific indicator-nutrient for the target microbes. No equipment other than a 35 degrees C incubator and long-wavelength (366-nm) light is necessary. To perform the test, one only has to add water to the powdered ingredients in a tube or flask. If total coliforms are present in the water sample, the solution will change from its normal colorless state (no target microbes present) to yellow. The specific presence of E. coli will cause the same tube to fluoresce under a longwave (366-nm) UV lamp. The test, called Autoanalysis Colilert (AC), was compared with Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 10-tube multiple tube fermentation (MTF) in a national evaluation. Five utilities, representing six U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regions, participated. All water samples came from distribution systems. Split samples from a wide variety of water sources were analyzed for the MPN-versus-MPN comparison. A total of 1,086 tubes were positive by MTF, and 1,279 were positive by AC. There was no statistical difference between MTF and AC. Species identifications from positive tubes confirmed the sensitivity of the AC. A national evaluation of the AC test showed that it: (i) was as sensitive as Standard Methods MTF, (ii) specifically enumerated 1 total coliform per 100 ml, in a maximum of 24 h, (iii) simultaneously enumerated 1 E. coli per 100 ml in the same analysis, (iv) was not subject to false-positive or false-negative results by heterotrophic bacteria, (v) did not require confirmatory tests, (vi) grew injured coliforms, (vii) was easy to inoculate, and (viii) was very easy to interpret.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3046490      PMCID: PMC202702          DOI: 10.1128/aem.54.6.1595-1601.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of the membrane filter with the most probable number method for coliform determinations from several waters.

Authors:  E L SHIPE; G M CAMERON
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1954-03

2.  Evaluation of recovery methods to detect coliforms in water.

Authors:  G K Bissonnette; J J Jezeski; G A McFeters; D G Stuart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Survival of coliform bacteria in natural waters: field and laboratory studies with membrane-filter chambers.

Authors:  G A McFeters; D G Stuart
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-11

5.  Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems.

Authors:  N J Jacobs; W L Zeigler; F C Reed; T A Stukel; E W Rice
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Influence of diluents, media, and membrane filters on detection fo injured waterborne coliform bacteria.

Authors:  G A McFeters; S C Cameron; M W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Failure of the most-probable-number technique to detect coliforms in drinking water and raw water supplies.

Authors:  T M Evans; C E Waarvick; R J Seidler; M W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Phenotypic characteristics of coliform and noncoliform bacteria from a public water supply compared with regional and national clinical species.

Authors:  S C Edberg; V Piscitelli; M Cartter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  New medium for improved recovery of coliform bacteria from drinking water.

Authors:  M W LeChevallier; S C Cameron; G A McFeters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques.

Authors:  T M Evans; M W LeChevallier; C E Waarvick; R J Seidler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  36 in total

1.  Cultivation-independent analysis of bacteria in IDEXX Quanti-Tray/2000 fecal indicator assays.

Authors:  Bram Sercu; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; Jill L S Murray; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Fluorogenic and chromogenic substrates used in bacterial diagnostics.

Authors:  M Manafi; W Kneifel; S Bascomb
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-09

3.  Total coliform detection in drinking water: comparison of membrane filtration with Colilert and Coliquik.

Authors:  B H Olson; D L Clark; B B Milner; M H Stewart; R L Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Evaluation of Enterolert for enumeration of enterococci in recreational waters.

Authors:  G E Budnick; R T Howard; D R Mayo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Limitations of highly sensitive enzymatic presence-absence tests for detection of waterborne coliforms and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S O Van Poucke; H J Nelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparative study of fluorogenic and chromogenic media for specific detection of environmental isolates of thermotolerant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Pramod W Ramteke; Suman Tewari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Marine bacteria cause false-positive results in the Colilert-18 rapid identification test for Escherichia coli in Florida waters.

Authors:  John M Pisciotta; Damon F Rath; Paul A Stanek; D Michael Flanery; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms.

Authors:  T C Covert; L C Shadix; E W Rice; J R Haines; R W Freyberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of colilert-marine water for detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in the marine environment.

Authors:  C J Palmer; Y L Tsai; A L Lang; L R Sangermano
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Evaluation of indoxyl-beta-D-glucuronide as a chromogen in media specific for Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J R Haines; T C Covert; C C Rankin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.