Literature DB >> 11823188

Marine bacteria cause false-positive results in the Colilert-18 rapid identification test for Escherichia coli in Florida waters.

John M Pisciotta1, Damon F Rath, Paul A Stanek, D Michael Flanery, Valerie J Harwood.   

Abstract

The Colilert-18 system for enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli is approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for use in drinking water analysis and is also used by various agencies and research studies for enumeration of indicator organisms in fresh and saline waters. During monitoring of Pinellas County, Fla., marine waters, estimates of E. coli numbers (by Colilert-18) frequently exceeded fecal coliform counts (by membrane filtration) by 1 to 3 orders of magnitude. Samples from freshwater sites did not display similar discrepancies. Fecal coliforms, including E. coli, could be cultured from 100% of yellow fluorescent wells (denoting E. coli-positive results) inoculated with freshwater samples but could be cultured from only 17.1% of the "positive" wells inoculated with marine samples. Ortho-nitrophenyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG)-positive or 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide (MUG)-positive noncoliform bacteria were readily cultured from Colilert-18 test wells inoculated with marine samples. Filtered cell-free seawater did not cause false positives. Coculture preparations of as few as 5 CFU of Vibrio cholerae (ONPG positive) and Providencia sp. (MUG positive) ml(-1) inoculated into Colilert-18 caused false-positive E. coli results. Salinity conditions influenced coculture results, as the concentration of coculture inoculum required to cause false positives in most wells increased from about 5 CFU ml(-1) in seawater diluted 1:10 with freshwater to approximately equal to 5,000 CFU ml(-1) in seawater diluted 1:20 with freshwater. Estimated E. coli numbers in various marine water samples processed at the 1:10 dilution ranged from 10 to 7,270 CFU.100 ml(-1), while E. coli numbers in the same samples processed at the 1:20 dilution did not exceed 40 CFU.100 ml(-1). The lower estimates of E. coli numbers corresponded well with fecal coliform counts by membrane filtration. This study indicates that assessment of E. coli in subtropical marine waters by Colilert-18 is not accurate when the recommended 1:10 sample dilution is used. The results suggest that greater dilution may diminish the false-positive problem, but further study of this possibility is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11823188      PMCID: PMC126722          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.2.539-544.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms.

Authors:  T C Covert; L C Shadix; E W Rice; J R Haines; R W Freyberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Sources of Escherichia coli in a coastal subtropical environment.

Authors:  H M Solo-Gabriele; M A Wolfert; T R Desmarais; C J Palmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with the standard multiple tube fermentation method.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M J Allen; D B Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Induction and general properties of beta-galactosidase and beta-galactoside permease in Pseudomonas BAL-31.

Authors:  C Hidalgo; J Reyes; R Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple-tube fermentation by the colilert and enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in southern sweden.

Authors:  K F Eckner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide-based medium for rapid isolation and identification of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R W Trepeta; S C Edberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A note on starch hydrolysis and beta-glucuronidase activity among flavobacteria.

Authors:  J P Petzel; P A Hartman
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1986-11

8.  Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. II. Use of a beta-glucuronidase detecting agar medium (PGUA agar) for the identification of E. coli in primary cultures of urine samples.

Authors:  M Kilian; P Bülow
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B       Date:  1979-10

9.  National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with presence-absence techniques.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M J Allen; D B Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Proportion of beta-D-glucuronidase-negative Escherichia coli in human fecal samples.

Authors:  G W Chang; J Brill; R Lum
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  10 in total

1.  A novel screening method for competitive FRET-aptamers applied to E. coli assay development.

Authors:  John G Bruno; Maria P Carrillo; Taylor Phillips; Carrie J Andrews
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Cultivation-independent analysis of bacteria in IDEXX Quanti-Tray/2000 fecal indicator assays.

Authors:  Bram Sercu; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; Jill L S Murray; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison and verification of bacterial water quality indicator measurement methods using ambient coastal water samples.

Authors:  John F Griffith; Larissa A Aumand; Ioannice M Lee; Charles D McGee; Laila L Othman; Kerry J Ritter; Kathy O Walker; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  A comparison of bacterial indicators and methods in rural surface waters.

Authors:  Robin W Kloot; Bobby Radakovich; Xiaoqing Huang; Daniel Duke Brantley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Escherichia coli isolates from feces, hands, and soils in rural Bangladesh via the Colilert Quanti-Tray System.

Authors:  Timothy R Julian; M Aminul Islam; Amy J Pickering; Subarna Roy; Erica R Fuhrmeister; Ayse Ercumen; Angela Harris; Jason Bishai; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  PCR-based detection of pathogens in improved water sources: a scoping review protocol of the evidence in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Shibabaw Tadesse Gemeda; Negasa Eshete Soboksa; Yonatal Mesfin Tefera; Adey Feleke Desta; Sirak Robele Gari
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Evaluation of Colilert-18 for detection of coliforms and Eschericha coli in subtropical freshwater.

Authors:  Kuo-Kuang Chao; Chen-Ching Chao; Wei-Liang Chao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Space/time analysis of fecal pollution and rainfall in an eastern North Carolina estuary.

Authors:  Angela D Coulliette; Eric S Money; Marc L Serre; Rachel T Noble
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Microbial monitoring of surface water in South Africa: an overview.

Authors:  Catherine D Luyt; Roman Tandlich; Wilhelmine J Muller; Brendan S Wilhelmi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Microbial quality and phylogenetic diversity of fresh rainwater and tropical freshwater reservoir.

Authors:  Rajni Kaushik; Rajasekhar Balasubramanian; Hugh Dunstan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.