Literature DB >> 31927684

A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.

Yinyin Chen1, Steven Culpepper2,3, Feng Liang1.   

Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) are latent variable models developed to infer latent skills, knowledge, or personalities that underlie responses to educational, psychological, and social science tests and measures. Recent research focused on theory and methods for using sparse latent class models (SLCMs) in an exploratory fashion to infer the latent processes and structure underlying responses. We report new theoretical results about sufficient conditions for generic identifiability of SLCM parameters. An important contribution for practice is that our new generic identifiability conditions are more likely to be satisfied in empirical applications than existing conditions that ensure strict identifiability. Learning the underlying latent structure can be formulated as a variable selection problem. We develop a new Bayesian variable selection algorithm that explicitly enforces generic identifiability conditions and monotonicity of item response functions to ensure valid posterior inference. We present Monte Carlo simulation results to support accurate inferences and discuss the implications of our findings for future SLCM research and educational testing.

Keywords:  Bayesian variable selection; identifiability; sparse latent class models

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31927684     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-019-09693-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  7 in total

1.  Practical identifiability of finite mixtures of multivariate bernoulli distributions.

Authors:  M A Carreira-Perpinan; S Renals
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

3.  Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis [Formula: see text] Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Guanhua Fang; Jingchen Liu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Statistical Analysis of Q-matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Yunxiao Chen; Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.

Authors:  Yinghan Chen; Steven Andrew Culpepper; Yuguo Chen; Jeffrey Douglas
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Theory of the Self-learning Q-Matrix.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Bernoulli (Andover)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.595

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  A multiple logistic regression-based (MLR-B) Q-matrix validation method for cognitive diagnosis models:A confirmatory approach.

Authors:  Dongbo Tu; Jin Chiu; Wenchao Ma; Daxun Wang; Yan Cai; Xueyuan Ouyang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-07-11

2.  Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.

Authors:  Motonori Oka; Kensuke Okada
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Efficient Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for High-Dimensional Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Chen-Wei Liu
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-09-08

4.  Estimating Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Small Samples: Bayes Modal Estimation and Monotonic Constraints.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-12-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.