Literature DB >> 33627916

Estimating Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Small Samples: Bayes Modal Estimation and Monotonic Constraints.

Wenchao Ma1, Zhehan Jiang2.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing popularity, cognitive diagnosis models have been criticized for limited utility for small samples. In this study, the authors proposed to use Bayes modal (BM) estimation and monotonic constraints to stabilize item parameter estimation and facilitate person classification in small samples based on the generalized deterministic input noisy "and" gate (G-DINA) model. Both simulation study and real data analysis were used to assess the utility of the BM estimation and monotonic constraints. Results showed that in small samples, (a) the G-DINA model with BM estimation is more likely to converge successfully, (b) when prior distributions are specified reasonably, and monotonicity is not violated, the BM estimation with monotonicity tends to produce more stable item parameter estimates and more accurate person classification, and (c) the G-DINA model using the BM estimation with monotonicity is less likely to overfit the data and shows higher predictive power.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes modal; EM algorithm; G-DINA; cognitive diagnosis; diagnostic classification; monotonic constraints

Year:  2020        PMID: 33627916      PMCID: PMC7876636          DOI: 10.1177/0146621620977681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  25 in total

1.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.

Authors:  Stephen Olejnik; James Algina
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-12

2.  A Hidden Markov Model for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis With Application to Spatial Rotation Skills.

Authors:  Yinghan Chen; Steven Andrew Culpepper; Shiyu Wang; Jeffrey Douglas
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-09-05

3.  An Improved Strategy for Bayesian Estimation of the Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper; Aaron Hudson
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-05-16

4.  Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis [Formula: see text] Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan.

Authors:  Zhehan Jiang; Richard Carter
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-04

Review 6.  A tutorial on how to do a Mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data.

Authors:  Klaas Sijtsma; L Andries van der Ark
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Prior sensitivity analysis in default Bayesian structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Sara van Erp; Joris Mulder; Daniel L Oberski
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.

Authors:  Yinghan Chen; Steven Andrew Culpepper; Yuguo Chen; Jeffrey Douglas
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Wenjing Guo
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.380

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improving reliability estimation in cognitive diagnosis modeling.

Authors:  Rodrigo Schames Kreitchmann; Jimmy de la Torre; Miguel A Sorrel; Pablo Nájera; Francisco J Abad
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.