| Literature DB >> 30455760 |
Andrea Ballini1, Luigi Santacroce2,3, Stefania Cantore1,3, Lucrezia Bottalico3, Gianna Dipalma4, Danila De Vito1, Rajiv Saini1, Francesco Inchingolo4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urogenital recurrent infections represent a global medical issue in the world, affecting millions of women because of dramatic shifts in bacterial composition and concentrations in response to numerous endogenous and exogenous factors. Urogenital microbiota forms a mutually beneficial relationship with their host and has a major impact on health and disease. AIM: This study aimed to compare probiotic therapy versus placebo in Oxidative Stress Values (OSVs) and histological features in urogenital infections in female patients.Entities:
Keywords: Nutraceutics; Probiotics; Urogenital Tract Infections; Vaginal infections; Vaginal microbiota
Year: 2018 PMID: 30455760 PMCID: PMC6236028 DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci ISSN: 1857-9655
UTIs Common Features
| • A strong, persistent urge to urinate. |
| • A burning sensation when urinating. |
| • Passing frequent, small amounts of urine. |
| • Urine that appears cloudy. |
| • Urine that appears red, a sign of blood in the urine. |
| • Strong-smelling urine. |
| • Pelvic pain. |
Figure 1Patient recruitment and selection
Figure 2Comparative chart: bap-assay
Figure 3Comparative chart: d-ROM-Assay
Subject Selection Criteria
| a. Caucasian aged between 18-50 years. |
| b. Volunteer to participate in the study. |
| c. Diagnosed with recurrent urogenital infection. |
| a. Any systemic disease like liver, kidney and thyroid. |
| b. Recent surgical treatments. |
| c. Pregnant Women. |
| d. Smoking habits. |
| e. Patients with sexually transmitted viruses onset on vaginal mucosa. |
| f. Patients with frequently recurring complicated vaginitis with a high fever. |
| g. Diseases are leading to influence oxidative stress, like syndromic conditions & rheumatological diseases. |
| h. Subject received antibiotics for the last 3 months and/or during the study |
| i. Subjects received immunosuppressive drugs |
Test group: oxidative stress values
| BAP Test (mmol/L) | d-ROM Test (U CARR) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | T0 | T1 | T2 | T0-T1 % Variation | T0-T2 % Variation | T0 | T1 | T2 | T0-T1 % Variation | T0-T2 % Variation |
| Test | 1629 | 2199 | 2365 | 34.99% | 45.18% | 432 | 358 | 322 | -17.12% | -25.46% |
| Control | 1645 | 1905 | 1805 | 15.80% | 9.72% | 440 | 450 | 457 | 2.27% | 3.86% |