| Literature DB >> 24031455 |
Natalia F Gil1, Rafael C R Martinez, Bruna C Gomes, Auro Nomizo, Elaine C P De Martinis.
Abstract
Urogenital infections affect millions of people every year worldwide. The treatment of these diseases usually requires the use of antimicrobial agents, and more recently, the use of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) cultures for the management of vaginal infections has been extensively studied. In this work, 11 vaginal lactobacilli isolates, previously obtained from healthy patients, were studied to screen microorganisms with probiotic properties against Candida spp. The LAB were tested for their ability of auto-aggregation, co-aggregation with C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis, adhesion to Caco-2 epithelial cells and production of lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). All lactobacilli isolates tested were able to auto-aggregate (ranging from 25.3% to 75.4% assessed at 4 hours of incubation) and to co-aggregate with the four Candida species into different degrees; among them L. crispatus showed the highest scores of co-aggregation. The highest amount of lactic acid was produced by L. salivarius (13.9 g/l), followed by L. johnsonii (6.5 g/l), L. acidophilus (5.5 g/l), and L. jensenii (5.4 g/l). All isolates produced H2O2, but the highest levels (3 - 10 mg/l) were observed for L. acidophilus, L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. johnsonii, and L. vaginalis. Only L. agilis, L. jensenii, L. johnsonii and L. ruminus were able to adhere to epithelial Caco-2 cells. Among the isolates evaluated, L agilis, L. jensenii, L. johnsonii, and L. ruminus exhibited simultaneously several desirable properties as potential probiotic strains justifying future studies to evaluate their technological properties in different pharmaceutical preparations for human use.Entities:
Keywords: Candida spp.; Lactobacillus spp., probiotic
Year: 2010 PMID: 24031455 PMCID: PMC3768620 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822010000100002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Auto-aggregation of Lactobacillus spp. evaluated in a 4-hour study (A) and microphotographies (magnification of 1000x) showing specifically auto-aggregation of L. acidophilus assessed after 1h (B) and 4h (C) of incubation at 37°C.
Co-aggregation scores obtained with Lactobacillus spp. And Candida spp. at 4h of incubation at 37°C, according classification of Reid et al. (31)*
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
No aggregation (0); small aggregates with small visible clusters of bacteria (1); aggregates with larger numbers of bacteria (2); macroscopically visible clumps with larger groups of bacteria settled in the center of the well (3) and macroscopically visible clumps (4).
Figure 2Microphotographies (magnification of 1000x) showing co-aggregation between C. albicans x L gasserii (A), C. krusei x L. vaginalis (B), C. albicans x L. johnsonii (C) and C. albicans x L. ruminus (D) assessed after 4h of incubation at 37°C, and respectively scored as: small aggregates with small visible clusters of bacteria (1); aggregates with larger numbers of bacteria (2); macroscopically visible clumps with larger groups of bacteria settled in the center of the well (3) and macroscopically visible clumps (4) according to Reid et al. (31).
Lactic acid production by vaginal Lactobacillus spp. isolates, expressed in g/l
| Species | Lactic acid (g/l) |
|---|---|
| 5.52 | |
| 1.72 | |
| 0.77 | |
| 1.32 | |
| 1.22 | |
| 1.35 | |
| 5.42 | |
| 6.50 | |
| 1.22 | |
| 13.95 | |
| 1.72 |
According to Edema and Sanni (9)
Semi-quantification of H2O2 production by vaginal Lactobacillus spp. isolates obtained from healthy patients
| Production of H2O2(mg/l) | |
| 1–3 | 3–10 |
Production of H2O2 was scored according to Wilks et al. (41) as: negative, 1–3, 3–10, 10–30, 30–100 mg/l of H2O2.
Classification of adhesion of vaginal isolates of Lactobacillus spp. to Caco-2 cells
| Non-adhesive | Adhesive |
Adhesion was classified according to Del Re et al. (7). ¥ L. bulgaricus and L. rhamnosus GG were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
Figure 3Microphotographies (magnification of 1000x) showing adhesion of L. rhamnosus (A), L. bulgaricus (B), and L. agilis (C) to the epithelial Caco-2 cell line.