Literature DB >> 30455209

The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research.

Gil Nelson1, Shari Ellis2.   

Abstract

The first two decades of the twenty-first century have seen a rapid rise in the mobilization of digital biodiversity data. This has thrust natural history museums into the forefront of biodiversity research, underscoring their central role in the modern scientific enterprise. The advent of mobilization initiatives such as the United States National Science Foundation's Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections (ADBC), Australia's Atlas of Living Australia (ALA), Mexico's National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Brazil's Centro de Referência em Informação (CRIA) and China's National Specimen Information Infrastructure (NSII) has led to a rapid rise in data aggregators and an exponential increase in digital data for scientific research and arguably provide the best evidence of where species live. The international Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) now serves about 131 million museum specimen records, and Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio) in the USA has amassed more than 115 million. These resources expose collections to a wider audience of researchers, provide the best biodiversity data in the modern era outside of nature itself and ensure the primacy of specimen-based research. Here, we provide a brief history of worldwide data mobilization, their impact on biodiversity research, challenges for ensuring data quality, their contribution to scientific publications and evidence of the rising profiles of natural history collections.This article is part of the theme issue 'Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropocene; biodiversity; data mobilization; digital data; digitization; iDigBio

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30455209      PMCID: PMC6282090          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  41 in total

1.  Herbarium records are reliable sources of phenological change driven by climate and provide novel insights into species' phenological cueing mechanisms.

Authors:  Charles C Davis; Charles G Willis; Bryan Connolly; Courtland Kelly; Aaron M Ellison
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 2.  Old Plants, New Tricks: Phenological Research Using Herbarium Specimens.

Authors:  Charles G Willis; Elizabeth R Ellwood; Richard B Primack; Charles C Davis; Katelin D Pearson; Amanda S Gallinat; Jenn M Yost; Gil Nelson; Susan J Mazer; Natalie L Rossington; Tim H Sparks; Pamela S Soltis
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Phenological synchronization disrupts trophic interactions between Kodiak brown bears and salmon.

Authors:  William W Deacy; Jonathan B Armstrong; William B Leacock; Charles T Robbins; David D Gustine; Eric J Ward; Joy A Erlenbach; Jack A Stanford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Herbarium specimens show patterns of fruiting phenology in native and invasive plant species across New England.

Authors:  Amanda S Gallinat; Luca Russo; Eli K Melaas; Charles G Willis; Richard B Primack
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Digitization of museum collections holds the potential to enhance researcher diversity.

Authors:  Joshua A Drew; Corrie S Moreau; Melanie L J Stiassny
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  VertNet: a new model for biodiversity data sharing.

Authors:  Heather Constable; Robert Guralnick; John Wieczorek; Carol Spencer; A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  No specimen left behind: industrial scale digitization of natural history collections.

Authors:  Vladimir Blagoderov; Ian J Kitching; Laurence Livermore; Thomas J Simonsen; Vincent S Smith
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 1.546

8.  The importance of digitized biocollections as a source of trait data and a new VertNet resource.

Authors:  Robert P Guralnick; Paula F Zermoglio; John Wieczorek; Raphael LaFrance; David Bloom; Laura Russell
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  The French Muséum national d'histoire naturelle vascular plant herbarium collection dataset.

Authors:  Gwenaël Le Bras; Marc Pignal; Marc L Jeanson; Serge Muller; Cécile Aupic; Benoît Carré; Grégoire Flament; Myriam Gaudeul; Claudia Gonçalves; Vanessa R Invernón; Florian Jabbour; Elodie Lerat; Porter P Lowry; Bérangère Offroy; Eva Pérez Pimparé; Odile Poncy; Germinal Rouhan; Thomas Haevermans
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  A Standardized Reference Data Set for Vertebrate Taxon Name Resolution.

Authors:  Paula F Zermoglio; Robert P Guralnick; John R Wieczorek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Emily K Meineke; T Jonathan Davies; Barnabas H Daru; Charles C Davis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Vascular plants from European Russia in the CSBG SB RAS Digital Herbarium.

Authors:  Nataliya Kovtonyuk; Irina Han; Evgeniya Gatilova
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2020-10-08

3.  Updating salamander datasets with phenotypic and stomach content information for two mainland Speleomantes.

Authors:  Enrico Lunghi; Fabio Cianferoni; Simone Giachello; Yahui Zhao; Raoul Manenti; Claudia Corti; Gentile Francesco Ficetola
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.444

Review 4.  The promises and challenges of archiving insect behavior and natural history in a changing world.

Authors:  Michael J Sheehan; Sara E Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.254

Review 5.  Museum specimens provide novel insights into changing plant-herbivore interactions.

Authors:  Emily K Meineke; T Jonathan Davies
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis.

Authors:  J Mason Heberling; Joseph T Miller; Daniel Noesgaard; Scott B Weingart; Dmitry Schigel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Deep learning in deep time.

Authors:  Alexander E White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Use of web-based species occurrence information systems by academics and government professionals.

Authors:  Elizabeth Martín-Mora; Shari Ellis; Lawrence M Page
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of North American arthropod collections: prospects and challenges for addressing biodiversity research.

Authors:  Neil S Cobb; Lawrence F Gall; Jennifer M Zaspel; Nicolas J Dowdy; Lindsie M McCabe; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  The Extended Specimen Network: A Strategy to Enhance US Biodiversity Collections, Promote Research and Education.

Authors:  James Lendemer; Barbara Thiers; Anna K Monfils; Jennifer Zaspel; Elizabeth R Ellwood; Andrew Bentley; Katherine LeVan; John Bates; David Jennings; Dori Contreras; Laura Lagomarsino; Paula Mabee; Linda S Ford; Robert Guralnick; Robert E Gropp; Marcy Revelez; Neil Cobb; Katja Seltmann; M Catherine Aime
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 8.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.