Literature DB >> 28827339

Phenological synchronization disrupts trophic interactions between Kodiak brown bears and salmon.

William W Deacy1,2, Jonathan B Armstrong3, William B Leacock4, Charles T Robbins5,6, David D Gustine7, Eric J Ward8, Joy A Erlenbach6, Jack A Stanford2.   

Abstract

Climate change is altering the seasonal timing of life cycle events in organisms across the planet, but the magnitude of change often varies among taxa [Thackeray SJ, et al. (2016) Nature 535:241-245]. This can cause the temporal relationships among species to change, altering the strength of interaction. A large body of work has explored what happens when coevolved species shift out of sync, but virtually no studies have documented the effects of climate-induced synchronization, which could remove temporal barriers between species and create novel interactions. We explored how a predator, the Kodiak brown bear (Ursus arctos middendorffi), responded to asymmetric phenological shifts between its primary trophic resources, sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa). In years with anomalously high spring air temperatures, elderberry fruited several weeks earlier and became available during the period when salmon spawned in tributary streams. Bears departed salmon spawning streams, where they typically kill 25-75% of the salmon [Quinn TP, Cunningham CJ, Wirsing AJ (2016) Oecologia 183:415-429], to forage on berries on adjacent hillsides. This prey switching behavior attenuated an iconic predator-prey interaction and likely altered the many ecological functions that result from bears foraging on salmon [Helfield JM, Naiman RJ (2006) Ecosystems 9:167-180]. We document how climate-induced shifts in resource phenology can alter food webs through a mechanism other than trophic mismatch. The current emphasis on singular consumer-resource interactions fails to capture how climate-altered phenologies reschedule resource availability and alter how energy flows through ecosystems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; grizzly bear; mismatch; phenology; prey switch

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28827339      PMCID: PMC5625906          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1705248114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

1.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The effects of phenological mismatches on demography.

Authors:  Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Toke Thomas Høye; David W Inouye; Eric Post
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactions.

Authors:  Louie H Yang; V H W Rudolf
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  A review of climate-driven mismatches between interdependent phenophases in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Amelia Caffarra; Bridget F O'Neill
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Diverse foraging opportunities drive the functional response of local and landscape-scale bear predation on Pacific salmon.

Authors:  Thomas P Quinn; Curry J Cunningham; Aaron J Wirsing
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Grasshopper community response to climatic change: variation along an elevational gradient.

Authors:  César R Nufio; Chris R McGuire; M Deane Bowers; Robert P Guralnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resource waves: phenological diversity enhances foraging opportunities for mobile consumers.

Authors:  Jonathan B Armstrong; Gaku Takimoto; Daniel E Schindler; Matthew M Hayes; Matthew J Kauffman
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Casting your network wide: a plea to scale-up phenological research.

Authors:  Stephen J Thackeray
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  A time-lapse photography method for monitoring salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) passage and abundance in streams.

Authors:  William W Deacy; William B Leacock; Lisa A Eby; Jack A Stanford
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Strengthening the evidence base for temperature-mediated phenological asynchrony and its impacts.

Authors:  Jelmer M Samplonius; Angus Atkinson; Christopher Hassall; Katharine Keogan; Stephen J Thackeray; Jakob J Assmann; Malcolm D Burgess; Jacob Johansson; Kirsty H Macphie; James W Pearce-Higgins; Emily G Simmonds; Øystein Varpe; Jamie C Weir; Dylan Z Childs; Ella F Cole; Francis Daunt; Tom Hart; Owen T Lewis; Nathalie Pettorelli; Ben C Sheldon; Albert B Phillimore
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research.

Authors:  Gil Nelson; Shari Ellis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Synchronous timing of food resources triggers bears to switch from salmon to berries.

Authors:  Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Phenological synchrony shapes pathology in host-parasite systems.

Authors:  Travis McDevitt-Galles; Wynne E Moss; Dana M Calhoun; Pieter T J Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Global shifts in the phenological synchrony of species interactions over recent decades.

Authors:  Heather M Kharouba; Johan Ehrlén; Andrew Gelman; Kjell Bolmgren; Jenica M Allen; Steve E Travers; Elizabeth M Wolkovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Functional macronutritional generalism in a large omnivore, the brown bear.

Authors:  Sean C P Coogan; David Raubenheimer; Gordon B Stenhouse; Nicholas C Coops; Scott E Nielsen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Denning in brown bears.

Authors:  Enrique González-Bernardo; Luca Francesco Russo; Esther Valderrábano; Ángel Fernández; Vincenzo Penteriani
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics in a disturbed world: implications for the maintenance of ecological networks.

Authors:  Nicolas Loeuille
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-24

9.  Phenological tracking associated with increased salmon consumption by brown bears.

Authors:  William W Deacy; Joy A Erlenbach; William B Leacock; Jack A Stanford; Charles T Robbins; Jonathan B Armstrong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Aerial surveys cause large but ephemeral decreases in bear presence at salmon streams in Kodiak, Alaska.

Authors:  William W Deacy; William B Leacock; Eric J Ward; Jonathan B Armstrong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.