Literature DB >> 23307495

Sperm counts may have declined in young university students in Southern Spain.

Jaime Mendiola1, Niels Jørgensen, Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Laura Sarabia-Cos, José J López-Espín, Guillermo Vivero-Salmerón, Karen J Ruiz-Ruiz, Mariana F Fernández, Nicolás Olea, Shanna H Swan, Alberto M Torres-Cantero.   

Abstract

Several studies have investigated temporal trends in semen quality in Northern Europe, but none has examined this question in Southern Europe. A prior study conducted in Almeria Province (Southern Spain) reported higher sperm count and concentration among Spanish young men recruited from 2001 to 2002 compared with young men from Northern Europe. The aim of this new study was to examine whether semen quality has changed among Spanish young men in the last decade. In this cross-sectional study, questionnaires and semen samples were collected from 215 healthy young university students from Murcia Region between 2010 and 2011. The 273 men from the Almeria study previously studied were included in a trend analysis of the two populations from Southern Spain. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the Murcia study population and these and semen variables for the Murcia and Almeria study populations were compared. Study methods and population characteristics were similar across the two studies. Therefore, we used multiple linear regression analyses on the combined population (controlling for study centre, age, ejaculation abstinence time, season, smoking, medication during the last 3 months, Body mass index (BMI), presence of varicocoele and prenatal exposure to tobacco) to look for a birth-cohort effect over the combined study period (2001-2011). Sperm concentration and total sperm count declined significantly with year of birth in the pooled analysis (β = -0.04 and β = -0.06, respectively, both p < 0.01). Sperm counts were significantly lower in Murcia study subjects than in the Almeria participants; sperm concentration median (5th-95th) = 44.0 (8.9-129) million/mL vs. 51.0 (5.0-206) million/mL; p < 0.01 and total sperm count = 121 (17.8-400) million vs. 149 (8.0-599) million; p < 0.01. Other semen variables did not differ significantly between the two studies. Our study suggests that total sperm count and sperm concentration may have declined in young Spanish men over the last decade.
© 2013 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23307495     DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00058.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Disappearing Sperms: Analysis of Reports Published Between 1980 and 2015.

Authors:  Pallav Sengupta; Sulagna Dutta; Elzbieta Krajewska-Kulak
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-04-19

2.  Trans fatty acid intake is inversely related to total sperm count in young healthy men.

Authors:  Jorge E Chavarro; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jaime Mendiola; Ana Cutillas-Tolín; José J López-Espín; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Spatiotemporal trends in human semen quality.

Authors:  Jacques Auger; Florence Eustache; Cécile Chevrier; Bernard Jégou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 16.430

4.  Adherence to diet quality indices in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones in young men.

Authors:  Ana Cutillas-Tolín; Evdochia Adoamnei; Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz; Jesús Vioque; Miriam Moñino-García; Niels Jørgensen; Jorge E Chavarro; Jaime Mendiola; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Mediterranean and western dietary patterns are related to markers of testicular function among healthy men.

Authors:  A Cutillas-Tolín; L Mínguez-Alarcón; J Mendiola; J J López-Espín; N Jørgensen; E M Navarrete-Muñoz; A M Torres-Cantero; J E Chavarro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Hair mercury (Hg) levels, fish consumption and semen parameters among men attending a fertility center.

Authors:  Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Myriam C Afeiche; Paige L Williams; Mariel Arvizu; Cigdem Tanrikut; Chitra J Amarasiriwardena; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.840

Review 7.  Male Reproductive Disorders and Fertility Trends: Influences of Environment and Genetic Susceptibility.

Authors:  Niels E Skakkebaek; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Germaine M Buck Louis; Jorma Toppari; Anna-Maria Andersson; Michael L Eisenberg; Tina Kold Jensen; Niels Jørgensen; Shanna H Swan; Katherine J Sapra; Søren Ziebe; Lærke Priskorn; Anders Juul
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 8.  Shedding light on the controversy surrounding the temporal decline in human sperm counts: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marcello Cocuzza; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-02

9.  Estrogenic exposure alters the spermatogonial stem cells in the developing testis, permanently reducing crossover levels in the adult.

Authors:  Lisa A Vrooman; Jon M Oatley; Jodi E Griswold; Terry J Hassold; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Anogenital distance is associated with semen quality but not reproductive hormones in 1106 young men from the general population.

Authors:  L Priskorn; A K Bang; L Nordkap; M Krause; J Mendiola; T K Jensen; A Juul; N E Skakkebaek; S H Swan; N Jørgensen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.