Literature DB >> 30452649

Perceptions of an online 'train-the-champion' approach to increase workplace movement.

Ana D Goode1, Nyssa T Hadgraft2,3, Maike Neuhaus4, Genevieve N Healy1,3,5.   

Abstract

Prolonged sitting is now recognized as an emergent work health and safety issue. To address the need for a scalable sitting-reduction intervention for workplaces, the BeUpstanding™ Champion Toolkit was developed. This free, online toolkit uses a 'train-the-champion' approach, providing a step-by-step guide and resources to workplace champions to assist them in raising awareness and building a supportive culture to reduce sitting time in their team. This qualitative study explored champion and staff perceptions of the beta (test) version of the toolkit. Seven work teams, from a range of workplace sectors (blue-/white-collar), sizes (small/medium/large) and locations (urban/regional) participated; all team members were exposed to the program (n = 603). Approximately 4 months after program initiation, semi-structured interviews were conducted with all champions (n = 7); focus groups were conducted with a random sample of staff (n = 40). Champions were followed-up again at 12 months (n = 5). Transcripts were coded by two researchers, with codes organized into overarching themes. All champions found the 'train-the-champion' approach, and the toolkit acceptable. Common enablers for intervention delivery included: champion passion for staff health and wellbeing; perceived fit of the program within existing practice; and, management support. Champions and staff reported improvements in knowledge/awareness about sitting, cultural norms, perceived stress, productivity and resilience. Facilitators for sustained change over time included a stable organizational climate and ongoing management support; barriers included workload intensification. The beta version of the BeUpstanding™ Champion Toolkit was highly acceptable to workplace champions and staff, and was perceived to have benefits for team culture and staff knowledge and wellbeing.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  evidence-based health promotion; program evaluation; qualitative methods; sedentary behavior; worksite

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30452649     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/day092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  8 in total

1.  Applying a User Centred Design Approach to Optimise a Workplace Initiative for Wide-Scale Implementation.

Authors:  Ana D Goode; Matthew Frith; Sarah A Hyne; Jennifer Burzic; Genevieve N Healy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Digital Intervention to Improve Sedentary Behaviour Across Multiple Workplace Settings.

Authors:  Bradley MacDonald; Ann-Marie Gibson; Xanne Janssen; Alison Kirk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Supporting Workers to Sit Less and Move More Through the Web-Based BeUpstanding Program: Protocol for a Single-Arm, Repeated Measures Implementation Study.

Authors:  Genevieve Nissa Healy; Ana D Goode; Alison Abbott; Jennifer Burzic; Bronwyn K Clark; David W Dunstan; Elizabeth G Eakin; Matthew Frith; Nicholas D Gilson; Lan Gao; Lynn Gunning; Jodie Jetann; Anthony D LaMontagne; Sheleigh P Lawler; Marjory Moodie; Phuong Nguyen; Neville Owen; Leon Straker; Perri Timmins; Lisa Ulyate; Elisabeth A H Winkler
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-05-04

4.  Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers' Sitting Time.

Authors:  Abigail S Morris; Kelly A Mackintosh; David Dunstan; Neville Owen; Paddy Dempsey; Thomas Pennington; Melitta A McNarry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  How supportive are workplace environments for sitting less and moving more? A descriptive study of Australian workplaces participating in the BeUpstanding program.

Authors:  Nyssa Hadgraft; Elisabeth Winkler; Ana D Goode; Lynn Gunning; David W Dunstan; Neville Owen; Takemi Sugiyama; Genevieve N Healy
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-10-25

6.  "Oh-oh, the others are standing up... I better do the same". Mixed-method evaluation of the implementation process of 'Take a Stand!' - a cluster randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent intervention to reduce sitting time among office workers.

Authors:  Ida H Danquah; Stine Kloster; Janne S Tolstrup
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Should We Scale-Up? A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of an Intervention Targeting Sedentary Office Workers Using the RE-AIM QuEST Framework.

Authors:  Bradley MacDonald; Ann-Marie Gibson; Xanne Janssen; Jasmin Hutchinson; Samuel Headley; Tracey Matthews; Alison Kirk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Mental Health Promotion and Intervention in Occupational Settings: Protocol for a Pilot Study of the MENTUPP Intervention.

Authors:  Ella Arensman; Cliodhna O'Connor; Caleb Leduc; Eve Griffin; Grace Cully; Doireann Ní Dhálaigh; Carolyn Holland; Chantal Van Audenhove; Evelien Coppens; Fotini Tsantila; Victoria Ross; Birgit Aust; Arlinda Cerga Pashoja; Johanna Cresswell-Smith; Laura Cox; Lars de Winter; Naim Fanaj; Birgit A Greiner; Ulrich Hegerl; Sharna Mathieu; Ana Moreno-Alcázar; Wendy Orchard; Charlotte Paterson; György Purebl; Gentiana Qirjako; Hanna Reich; Paul Corcoran
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.