Literature DB >> 33322678

Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers' Sitting Time.

Abigail S Morris1,2, Kelly A Mackintosh1, David Dunstan3, Neville Owen3, Paddy Dempsey3,4,5, Thomas Pennington1, Melitta A McNarry1.   

Abstract

This feasibility study evaluated the effects of an individual-level intervention to target office workers total and prolonged sedentary behaviour during working hours, using an e-health smartphone application. A three-arm (Prompt-30 or 60 min Intervention arm and a No-Prompt Comparison arm), quasi-randomised intervention was conducted over 12 weeks. Behavioural outcomes (worktime sitting, standing, stepping, prolonged sitting, and physical activity) were monitored using accelerometers and anthropometrics measured at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Cardiometabolic measures were taken at baseline and 12 weeks. Fifty-six office workers (64% female) completed baseline assessments. The Prompt-60 arm was associated with a reduction in occupational sitting time at 6 (-46.8 min/8 h workday [95% confidence interval = -86.4, -6.6], p < 0.05) and 12 weeks (-69.6 min/8 h workday [-111.0, -28.2], p < 0.05) relative to the No-Prompt Comparison arm. Sitting was primarily replaced with standing in both arms (p > 0.05). Both Intervention arms reduced time in prolonged sitting bouts at 12 weeks (Prompt-30: -27.0 [-99.0, 45.0]; Prompt-60: -25.8 [-98.4, 47.4] min/8 h workday; both p > 0.05). There were no changes in steps or cardiometabolic risk. Findings highlight the potential of a smartphone e-health application, suggesting 60 min prompts may present an optimal frequency to reduce total occupational sedentary behaviour.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activity breaks; feasibility; intervention; physical activity; sedentary behaviour; sitting; workplace

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322678      PMCID: PMC7764765          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  55 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic health.

Authors:  Sebastien F M Chastin; Thorlene Egerton; C Leask; Emmanuel Stamatakis
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity.

Authors:  John P Buckley; Alan Hedge; Thomas Yates; Robert J Copeland; Michael Loosemore; Mark Hamer; Gavin Bradley; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Perceptions of an online 'train-the-champion' approach to increase workplace movement.

Authors:  Ana D Goode; Nyssa T Hadgraft; Maike Neuhaus; Genevieve N Healy
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.483

4.  Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting With Standing or Walking Attenuates the Postprandial Metabolic Response in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Acute Study.

Authors:  Joseph Henson; Melanie J Davies; Danielle H Bodicoat; Charlotte L Edwardson; Jason M R Gill; David J Stensel; Keith Tolfrey; David W Dunstan; Kamlesh Khunti; Thomas Yates
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Breaking up workplace sitting time with intermittent standing bouts improves fatigue and musculoskeletal discomfort in overweight/obese office workers.

Authors:  Alicia A Thorp; Bronwyn A Kingwell; Neville Owen; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Environmental, behavioural and multicomponent interventions to reduce adults' sitting time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Melissa M Peachey; Julie Richardson; Ada V Tang; Vanina Dal-Bello Haas; Janelle Gravesande
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 7.  Associations of occupational standing with musculoskeletal symptoms: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pieter Coenen; Lisa Willenberg; Sharon Parry; Joyce W Shi; Lorena Romero; Diana M Blackwood; Christopher G Maher; Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Acceptability and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for influencing sedentary time at work: focus group interviews in executives and employees.

Authors:  Katrien De Cocker; Charlene Veldeman; Dirk De Bacquer; Lutgart Braeckman; Neville Owen; Greet Cardon; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Dean Fixsen; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses.

Authors:  Nyssa T Hadgraft; Elisabeth Winkler; Rachel E Climie; Megan S Grace; Lorena Romero; Neville Owen; David Dunstan; Genevieve Healy; Paddy C Dempsey
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Sedentary Behavior Interventions on Mental Well-Being and Work Performance While Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Grace E Falk; Emily L Mailey; Hayrettin Okut; Sara K Rosenkranz; Richard R Rosenkranz; Justin L Montney; Elizabeth Ablah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Evaluating a multi-component intervention to reduce and break up office workers' sitting with sit-stand desks using the APEASE criteria.

Authors:  Marsha L Brierley; Lindsey R Smith; Daniel P Bailey; Samson O Ojo; David J Hewson; Sofie A Every; Taylor A Staines; Angel M Chater
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.