Robert C Yoder1, Lawrence T Dauer2, Stephen Balter3, John D Boice4,5, Helen A Grogan6, Michael T Mumma7, Christopher N Passmore8, Lawrence N Rothenberg2, Richard J Vetter9. 1. Landauer, Inc (Retired), Glenwood, IL, USA. 2. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Columbia University (Retired), New York, NY, USA. 4. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, USA. 5. Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Division of Epidemiology Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Cascade Scientific, Inc, Bend, OR, USA. 7. International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. 8. Landauer, Inc, Glenwood, IL, USA. 9. Mayo Clinic (retired), Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of lifetime radiation doses for medical workers presents special challenges not commonly encountered for the other worker cohorts comprising the Million Worker Study. METHODS: The selection of approximately 175,000 medical radiation workers relies on using estimates of lifetime and annual personal monitoring results collected since 1977. Approaches have been created to adjust the monitoring results so that mean organ absorbed doses can be estimated. RESULTS: Changes in medical technology and practices have altered the radiation exposure environments to which a worker may have been exposed during their career. Other temporal factors include shifts in regulatory requirements that influenced the conduct of radiation monitoring and the changes in the measured dose quantities. CONCLUSIONS: The use of leaded aprons during exposure to lower energy X rays encountered in fluoroscopically based radiology adds complexity to account for the shielding of the organs located in the torso when dosimeters were worn over leaded aprons. Estimating doses to unshielded tissues such as the brain and lens of the eye become less challenging when dosimeters are worn at the collar above the apron. The absence of leaded aprons in the higher energy photon settings lead to a more straightforward process of relating dosimeter results to mean organ doses.
BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of lifetime radiation doses for medical workers presents special challenges not commonly encountered for the other worker cohorts comprising the Million Worker Study. METHODS: The selection of approximately 175,000 medical radiation workers relies on using estimates of lifetime and annual personal monitoring results collected since 1977. Approaches have been created to adjust the monitoring results so that mean organ absorbed doses can be estimated. RESULTS: Changes in medical technology and practices have altered the radiation exposure environments to which a worker may have been exposed during their career. Other temporal factors include shifts in regulatory requirements that influenced the conduct of radiation monitoring and the changes in the measured dose quantities. CONCLUSIONS: The use of leaded aprons during exposure to lower energy X rays encountered in fluoroscopically based radiology adds complexity to account for the shielding of the organs located in the torso when dosimeters were worn over leaded aprons. Estimating doses to unshielded tissues such as the brain and lens of the eye become less challenging when dosimeters are worn at the collar above the apron. The absence of leaded aprons in the higher energy photon settings lead to a more straightforward process of relating dosimeter results to mean organ doses.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dosimetry; epidemiology; personal monitoring
Authors: John D Boice; Elizabeth D Ellis; Ashley P Golden; David J Girardi; Sarah S Cohen; Heidi Chen; Michael T Mumma; Roy E Shore; Richard W Leggett Journal: Health Phys Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Stephen Balter; Donald L Miller; Preetha Rajaraman; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; Steven L Simon; Mark P Little; Michele M Doody; Bruce H Alexander; Dale L Preston Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 6.582
Authors: Elena Obrador; Rosario Salvador-Palmer; Juan I Villaescusa; Eduardo Gallego; Blanca Pellicer; José M Estrela; Alegría Montoro Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Lawrence T Dauer; Meghan Woods; Daniel Miodownik; Brian Serencsits; Brian Quinn; Michael Bellamy; Craig Yoder; Xiaolin Liang; John D Boice; Jonine Bernstein Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Christian Apelmann; Birgitt Kowald; Nils Weinrich; Jens Dischinger; Albert Nienhaus; Klaus Seide; Heiko Martens; Christian Jürgens Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 3.390