Literature DB >> 30451566

Dosimetry for the study of medical radiation workers with a focus on the mean absorbed dose to the lung, brain and other organs.

Robert C Yoder1, Lawrence T Dauer2, Stephen Balter3, John D Boice4,5, Helen A Grogan6, Michael T Mumma7, Christopher N Passmore8, Lawrence N Rothenberg2, Richard J Vetter9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reconstruction of lifetime radiation doses for medical workers presents special challenges not commonly encountered for the other worker cohorts comprising the Million Worker Study.
METHODS: The selection of approximately 175,000 medical radiation workers relies on using estimates of lifetime and annual personal monitoring results collected since 1977. Approaches have been created to adjust the monitoring results so that mean organ absorbed doses can be estimated.
RESULTS: Changes in medical technology and practices have altered the radiation exposure environments to which a worker may have been exposed during their career. Other temporal factors include shifts in regulatory requirements that influenced the conduct of radiation monitoring and the changes in the measured dose quantities.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of leaded aprons during exposure to lower energy X rays encountered in fluoroscopically based radiology adds complexity to account for the shielding of the organs located in the torso when dosimeters were worn over leaded aprons. Estimating doses to unshielded tissues such as the brain and lens of the eye become less challenging when dosimeters are worn at the collar above the apron. The absence of leaded aprons in the higher energy photon settings lead to a more straightforward process of relating dosimeter results to mean organ doses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dosimetry; epidemiology; personal monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30451566      PMCID: PMC9465996          DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1549756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   3.352


  19 in total

1.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

Review 2.  A REVIEW OF TWO METHODS USED IN THE USA TO ASSESS HE DURING FLUOROSCOPIC-BASED RADIOLOGY.

Authors:  R Craig Yoder; Mark R Salasky
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Personnel monitoring in diagnostic radiology: revisited--again!

Authors:  S C Bushong
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Interventional radiologists: occupational radiation doses and risks.

Authors:  L T Niklason; M V Marx; H P Chan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dose equivalent index and personal dosimetry.

Authors:  T F Johns
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Jacob Goldstein; Olivier Bar; James A Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Space: The Final Frontier-Research Relevant to Mars.

Authors:  John D Boice
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  The Past Informs the Future: An Overview of the Million Worker Study and the Mallinckrodt Chemical Works Cohort.

Authors:  John D Boice; Elizabeth D Ellis; Ashley P Golden; David J Girardi; Sarah S Cohen; Heidi Chen; Michael T Mumma; Roy E Shore; Richard W Leggett
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  The Million Person Study relevance to space exploration and Mars.

Authors:  John D Boice
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Occupational Radiation Exposure and Deaths From Malignant Intracranial Neoplasms of the Brain and CNS in U.S. Radiologic Technologists, 1983-2012.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Stephen Balter; Donald L Miller; Preetha Rajaraman; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; Steven L Simon; Mark P Little; Michele M Doody; Bruce H Alexander; Dale L Preston
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 6.582

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers.

Authors:  John Boice; Lawrence T Dauer; Kenneth R Kase; Fred A Mettler; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies: Biological Effects, Countermeasures and Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Elena Obrador; Rosario Salvador-Palmer; Juan I Villaescusa; Eduardo Gallego; Blanca Pellicer; José M Estrela; Alegría Montoro
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Cohort profile - MSK radiation workers: a feasibility study to establish a deceased worker sub-cohort as part of a multicenter medical radiation worker component in the million person study of low-dose radiation health effects.

Authors:  Lawrence T Dauer; Meghan Woods; Daniel Miodownik; Brian Serencsits; Brian Quinn; Michael Bellamy; Craig Yoder; Xiaolin Liang; John D Boice; Jonine Bernstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Radiation Dose to the Eye Lens Through Radiological Imaging Procedures at the Surgical Workplace During Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Christian Apelmann; Birgitt Kowald; Nils Weinrich; Jens Dischinger; Albert Nienhaus; Klaus Seide; Heiko Martens; Christian Jürgens
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.