Hui Hu1,2, Yuanyuan Ding1,2, Wenbo Mu1,2, Ying Li1,2, Yanpeng Wang3, Weifang Jiang4, Yong Fu1,5, Jinfa Tou1,4, Wei Chen1,2,6. 1. 1 Children's Hospital Affiliated and Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Neonatal Diseases of Zhejiang Province, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China. 2. 2 Institute of Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China. 3. 3 Department of Gynecology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, China. 4. 4 Department of Neonatal Surgery, Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China. 5. 5 Otolaryngological Department, Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China. 6. 6 Department of Neurobiology, Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of Ministry of Health of China, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China.
Abstract
Cell therapy has great promise for treating gastrointestinal motility disorders caused by intestinal nervous system (ENS) diseases. However, appropriate sources, other than enteric neural stem cells and human embryonic stem cells, are seldom reported. Here, we show that neural progenitors derived from the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of EGFP mice survived, differentiated into enteric neurons and glia cells, migrated widely from the site of injection, and established neuron-muscle connections following transplantation into the distal colon of postnatal mice. The exogenous EGFP+ neurons were physiologically functional as shown by the activity of calcium imaging. This study shows that that other tissues besides the postnatal bowel harbor neural crest stem cells or neural progenitors that have the potential to differentiate into functional enteric neurons in vivo and can potentially be used for intestinal nerve regeneration. These DRG-derived neural progenitor cells may be a choice for cell therapy of ENS disease as an allograft. The new knowledge provided by our study is important for the development of neural crest stem cell and cell therapy for the treatment of intestinal neuropathy.
Cell therapy has great promise for treating gastrointestinal motility disorders caused by intestinal nervous system (ENS) diseases. However, appropriate sources, other than enteric neural stem cells and human embryonic stem cells, are seldom reported. Here, we show that neural progenitors derived from the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of EGFP mice survived, differentiated into enteric neurons and glia cells, migrated widely from the site of injection, and established neuron-muscle connections following transplantation into the distal colon of postnatal mice. The exogenous EGFP+ neurons were physiologically functional as shown by the activity of calcium imaging. This study shows that that other tissues besides the postnatal bowel harbor neural crest stem cells or neural progenitors that have the potential to differentiate into functional enteric neurons in vivo and can potentially be used for intestinal nerve regeneration. These DRG-derived neural progenitor cells may be a choice for cell therapy of ENS disease as an allograft. The new knowledge provided by our study is important for the development of neural crest stem cell and cell therapy for the treatment of intestinal neuropathy.
The enteric nervous system (ENS) plays a significant role in regulating motility,
secretion, and other gut functions[1]. The most common identifiable disorder of the ENS is Hirschsprung disease (HD), which
occurs in 1 of every 5000 live births as a result of neural crest-derived precursor cells
failing to colonize the gut during embryonic development[2]. Current therapy for HD is surgical resection of the aganglionic bowel or the region
of the bowel affected by complications[3], but few effective treatments are available for the acquired enteric neuropathies[4,5].Based on tremendous advances in regenerative medicine, stem cell-based replacement of
defective or missing enteric neurons for HD treatment is a promising therapeutic tool to
avoid surgery, optimize outcomes, and restore gut motility. Several candidate cells have
been explored for ENS reconstruction, including the ENS itself, skin-derived neural crest
stem cells (NCSC), human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)[6-13].The fetal and postnatal intestine from rodent and human is an attractive source from which
to isolate neural progenitor cells (NPs)[14-22]. Notably, these neonatal enteric neural stem cells (ENSC) showed migration ability,
and differentiate into neurons and glia cells following transplantation into the postnatal
rodent gut[6,23-25]. ENSC-expressing channelrhodopsin showed functional integration and innervation of
the smooth muscle of the bowel wall following the transplantation into the bowel[26].Fattahi et al. reported vagal neural crest lineage induction from hESCs, and further
differentiation into ENS in vivo[13]. Although the question of bowel motility remained to be addressed[27], the HD model mice had extended lifespans after cell transplantation.To date, no other source of cells has been reported for ENS formation in the gut. Previous
reports indicated that, according to the development principle, NCSCs were the source of
ENS. Various sources of NCSCs have been identified; NCSCs can be derived from the embryonic
sciatic nerve[28] and boundary cap[29], the gut, skin[30,31], bone marrow[32], and the dorsal root ganglia (DRG)[32,33] of adult rodents. The NCSCs from different tissues share a common developmental
origin with ENS. Considering the roles of NCSCs during embryonic development and
neuropathies of the intestine, other NCSC-containing tissues might be potential cell sources
for intestinal ENS regeneration. In the present study, we explored the differentiation
potential of NCSC isolated from DRG in ENS in the postnatal colon. We also studied whether
NCSC coming from DRG-derived NCSC exhibit a similar potential for differentiation in the gut
as the NCSC from intestine described in previous reports[23,25].Following transplantation into the postnatal colon of mice, the DRG-NPs survived, migrated,
and differentiated into functional enteric neurons. The DRG-NPs also expressed mature
presynaptic protein synaptophysin and closely associated with endogenous neurons and muscle.
This study showed for the first time that NCSC from sources other than ENSCs and hESCs/iPSCs
could generate functional enteric neuron in the postnatal gut, thus broadening the range of
cell candidates for the anatomic and functional replacement of ENS cells. Our results also
suggest that NCSCs from postnatal tissues besides the gut might still maintain their
multipotency for ENS differentiation, independent of tissue source.
Materials and Methods
Experimental Animals
Wild-type C57BL/6 J and C57BL/6-Tg (CAG-EGFP) (average body weight 25 ± 1.2 g for both
male and female) were purchased from Model Animal Center of Nanjing University (Nanjing,
China). Animal experiments were conducted according to the Guidelines of the Zhejiang
University Laboratory Animal Center for the care and use of laboratory animals, and were
approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Medical School, Zhejiang
University.
DRG NP Cell Generation, Derivation and Identification
Lumbar dorsal roots at the levels between L1 and L5 were carefully removed from
C57BL/6-Tg (CAG-EGFP) mice at postnatal day 7 and placed in cold Dulbecco’s modified
eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA).
DRG-NCSCs were generated as previously described with some modifications[34].Each dorsal root was minced with scissors into small pieces for explant culture. The
explants were harvested and seeded in 24-well plates coated with collagen (Gibco, 5
µg/cm2) in primary medium of DMEM: F12 (Gibco), containing N2 (100×, Gibco),
B27(50×, Gibco), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, 20 ng/ml, Peprotech, Rocky Hill,
NJ, USA) and epidermal growth factor (EGF, 20 ng/ml, Peprotech). In DRG explant cultures,
cells with a triangular shape migrated out of the explants and formed a layer on the
collagen after the first 1–2 days. The explant pieces were then picked up and attached to
a fresh plate for another 1–2 days. Each explant was cultured on a fresh plate two or
three times. Cells migrating out from the explants were proliferated in neural progenitor
proliferation medium, which was made up in 500 ml batches containing 432 ml of DMEM: F12,
50 ml of Probumin (20% vol/vol stock solution, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), 5 ml of
penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco), 5 ml of l-alanyl-l-glutamine (Cellgro,
Lincoln, NE, USA), 5 ml of MEM non-essential amino acids (Cellgro), 0.5 ml of trace
elements A (Cellgro), 0.5 ml of trace elements B (Cellgro), 0.5 ml of trace elements C
(Cellgro), 0.9 ml of 2-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen), transferrin (10 mg/ml, Invitrogen),
(+) sodium l-ascorbate (50 mg/ml, Sigma), Heregulin B-1 (10 ng/ml, Peprotech),
LONGR3 IGF-I (200 ng/ml, Sigma) and bFGF (8 ng/ml, Peprotech)[35]. Cells were detached and formed spherical aggregates after they were transferred to
low-attachment plates. Half of the medium was changed every 3 days.
Differentiation
To assess the ability of cells to differentiate into a neural lineage, the
differentiation method from Lee et.al was used[36]. Briefly, DRG-NCSCs at passage 2 were chosen for neuron and glia differentiation
analysis and seeded at 5000 cells/cm2 on coverslips coated with poly-ornithine
(0.01%, 1:5 dilutions, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA)/fibronectin (25 µg/ml) in 24-well
plates. For neuron differentiation, the medium consisted of DMEM: F12 medium (1:1, Gibco),
2% B27 medium (Gibco), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (10 ng/ml, Peprotech), glial cell
line-derived neurotrophic factor (10 ng/ml, Peprotech), nerve growth factor (10 ng/ml,
Peprotech), neurotrophin-3 (10 ng/ml, Peprotech), ascorbic acid (200 µM, Sigma) and cAMP
(0.5 mM, Sigma). For glia differentiation, the medium consisted of DMEM: F12 medium
(Gibco), N2, B27 medium (Gibco), bFGF (10 ng/ml, Peprotech), EGF (10 ng/ml, Peprotech) and
5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco). DRG-NPs were cultured for 2–3 weeks, and the medium
was changed every 2–3 days. Differentiated cells were analyzed by assessing the expression
of neural and glia markers by immunocytochemistry.
Transplantation
The surgery of transplantation was performed according to a previous report[23]. Briefly, DRG-derived neurospheres at passage 2 were transplanted into the distal
intestine of 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 J wild-type mice. Animals were anesthetized by the
injection of 200 µl 5% chloral hydrate solution (RWD Life Science, San Diego, CA, USA). A
small abdominal incision was made, and the distal colon was exposed and exteriorized. A
total of 6 µl of neurospheres (1.0 × 105 cells/µl) with a mean diameter of
about 40 µm for transplantation in DMEM: F12 medium with 50% Matrigel (BD Biosciences,
Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were injected into the external muscle layer of the distal colon
with a glass needle at three sites, and the injection sites were marked with 7/0 Nylon.
After 10 min, the distal colon was returned, and then the abdominal wall and skin was
seamed with 7-0 suture. Animals were injected with cefoperazone and sulbactam sodium 0.5
mg per gram of body weight (0.5 mg/g) postoperatively. The recipient mice were
immunosuppressed by daily injections of cyclosporine 10 µg per gram of body weight (10
µg/g, Sigma). At 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 or 8 weeks after surgery, the mice were sacrificed and
the tissue was collected for histological analysis.
Tissue Preparation
For cryosections, the distal colon was opened along the mesenteric border, pinned,
stretched on Sylgard coated dishes, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and dehydrated in
30% sucrose with phosphate buffer saline (PBS), and then transferred to an O.C.T. cryomold
(Tissue-Tek, Torrance, CA, USA). Frozen sections (12 μm thick) were cut transversely or
longitudinally on a cryostat.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunostaining was performed on primary monolayer cells, spheres, differentiated cells
and cryosections of gut samples. Cultured cells or tissue sections were fixed with 4% PFA
for 15 min at room temperature, rinsed three times with PBS, and then exposed to blocking
solution (PBS containing 5% serum of the same origin as the secondary antibody and 0.2%
Triton X-100) for 30 min at room temperature followed by overnight incubation at 4°C with
the primary antibodies in blocking solution, and subsequent incubation for 1 h with
secondary antibodies at room temperature. Primary and second antibody information is
listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Antibodies Used in this Study.
Primary antibodies used in this study
Antigen
Supplier
Dilution
Cat. NO
Host
P75
Abcam
1:200
ab8875
Rabbit
Nestin
Millipore
1:200
MAB353
mouse
Sox10
Abcam
1:250
ab155279
Rabbit
TuJ1
Covance
1:200
mrb-435p
Rabbit
PGP9.5
Abcam
1:200
ab8189
mouse
NF200
sigma
1:200
N4142
Rabbit
Peripherin
Millipore
1:200
MAB1527
mouse
S100β
Abcam
1:200
ab52642
Rabbit
nNOS
Abcam
1:500
ab76067
Rabbit
VIP
Santa Cruz
1:20
sc-207
Rabbit
Tyrosine hydroxylase
Millipore
1:300
MAB318
mouse
Synaptophysin
Abcam
1:50
ab8049
mouse
Alpha smooth muscle Actin
Abcam
1:1500
ab5694
Rabbit
Ki67
Abcam
1:500
ab15580
Rabbit
Secondary antibodies used in this study
Secondary Antibody
Supplier
Dillution
Cat. NO
Donkey anti-Mouse IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488
Thermo Fisher Scientific
1:500
A-21202
Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 488
Thermo Fisher Scientific
1:500
A-21206
Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 594
Thermo Fisher Scientific
1:500
A-21207
Donkey anti-Mouse IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 594
Thermo Fisher Scientific
1:500
A-21203
Donkey anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L), Alexa Fluor 647
Thermo Fisher Scientific
1:500
A-31573
Antibodies Used in this Study.
Measurement of Cell Fiber Length, Differentiation and Statistical Analysis
To determine the fiber length of cells derived from DRG-NCSC-derived neurospheres
implanted in the distal colon, a z-series of images was obtained on a Nikon A1 confocal
microscope. The images were projected, and the fiber length was measured using the ImageJ
software program. GraphPad Prism was used for statistical analysis of cell numbers in the
culture, proliferation and immunostaining experiments.
Ca2+ Imaging
Transplanted animals were euthanized by 200 µl chloral hydrate (10%). For Ca2+
imaging, the protocol used was that of Fried et al. with minor revision[37]. Intestinal segments were removed and immediately placed in the medium prepared as
DMEM: F12 with 3 μM nicardipine hydrochloride and 1 μM scopolamine hydrochloride
(hereafter referred to as “Medium”) in a dish on ice. The region of the distal colon
owning EGFP+ transplanted cells was incised along the mesenteric border and
pinned flat under light tension with the mucosa side up in medium with a silicone
elastomer (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA). The mucosal and submucosal layers
were carefully dissected using fine forceps. After washing with medium three times, tissue
preparations were incubated with 4 μM Rhod-2 (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Waltham, MA, USA) in loading solution (3 ml medium with 2.4 μl of a 250 mM probenecid
stock and 1.5 μl of 4 mM Rhod-2 stock) for 30 min in a dark incubator at 37°C. After
loading, tissues were transferred to a recording chamber and mounted on an inverted
confocal laser-scanning microscope. Rhod-2 was excited at 552 nm, and its fluorescence
emission was measured at 581 nm using a 10× objective. Recordings were made at room
temperature under constant local perfusion (2 ml/min) with modified Krebs buffer (121 mM
NaCl, 5.9 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1.2 mM
NaH2PO4, 10 mM HEPES, 21.2 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM pyruvic
acid, and 8 mM glucose with pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH). High K+ (70 mM) was
used for stimulating the cells and image sequences were captured at a frequency of one
image every 2s. After recording, the time-lapse movie of the experiment was viewed and
regions of interest (ROIs) were selected. The fluorescence intensities (F) of the ROIs
were compared with the initial baseline fluorescence value (F0). Changes in normalized
fluorescence intensity (ΔF/F0) were directly proportional to changes in Ca2+
concentration.
Results
In Vitro Derivation and Characterization of Transplantable NCSC Progenitors from the
Postnatal DRG
It has been demonstrated that adult DRGs harbor NCSCs and that these NCSCs could be
derived from DRG explant culture[33,38]. Here, we isolated these NCSCs from postnatal C57BL/6-Tg (CAG-EGFP+)
mice using a previously published protocol with some modifications[38].Because of the high migratory ability of NCSCs[39], NCSCs were the first type of cells to migrate out of DRG explants after the
explants had attached to the plate. Cells migrating out from the DRG formed a dense layer
on the collagen after 1 week. Other kinds of cells also eventually migrated out the
explants during the 1-week process of explant culture; thus, to optimize the purity and
reduce the proportion of non-NCSCs within the emigrated cells, every piece of DRG was
transferred to another well or plate after 1–2 days of attachment (Fig 1 B, C). Each piece of explant was used for
attachment no more than three times, and cells migrating out from the DRG were used for
further proliferation in NP proliferation medium. The selected cells were then
continuously cultured as a monolayer, or as spheres that were spontaneously formed in
passage 2 on low-attachment plates prior to transplantation (Fig 1D, E). The whole process is illustrated in Fig 1A. The next step was to confirm
the identity of cells migrating out from the DRG. The low-affinity neurotrophin receptor
(P75)—a transmembrane glycoprotein—is expressed in enteric NCSCs and glial cells[40] and has been used as a selection marker for successfully isolating NCSCs from the
gut tissue of mice and humans[41-43]. In combination with the NCSCs marker Sox10 and neural stem cell (NSC) marker
Nestin, P75 was used to identify the NCSCs from the DRG. Cells migrating out from the DRG
were cultured on fibronectin-coated coverslips for 2 days, fixed, and analyzed by
immunocytochemistry. To monitor the behavior in vivo, these cells were
derived from mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (Fig 1F, J), and most of them were
positive for the three NCSC markers, P75 (87.4% ± 6.9%, n = 3), Sox10
(79.7% ± 6.8%, n = 3) and Nestin (83.6% ± 1.4%, n = 3)
(Fig 1F–L and M). To ensure a
sufficient number of cells for transplantation, migrated cells at passage 2 or passage 3
were allowed to proliferate before the transplantation. To demonstrate that these cells
still maintained NCSC markers after a period of time in proliferation medium,
immunostaining of DRG-derived cells in passage 2 spheres showed that most of these cells
expressed the NSC marker Nestin (79.3% ± 10.7%, n = 3), the NCSC markers
Sox10 (85.4% ± 8.6%, n = 3) and P75 (87.6% ± 6.4%, n =
3) (Fig S1 A-C, E). The proliferative characteristics of the cells were demonstrated by
the positive immunostaining of Ki67 (passage 5 as a monolayer, Ki67+ cells
accounted for 67.7% ± 8.7% of cells, n = 3) (Fig S1 C–E) and by the
growth curves of cells at passage 1 and passage 5 (Fig S1 F). The growth curves indicated
that the proliferative ability slightly decreased after four passages.
Fig 1.
DRG-derived neural crest stem cells isolation, proliferation, and characterization in
vitro. (A) Schematic representation of the workflow of DRG-NCSC derivation,
proliferation, and transplantation into the distal intestine of postnatal mice. Pieces
of mouse lumbar DRGs were placed on the 24-well plate in the primary medium. Cells
migrated out after 1–2 days and were designated as passage 0 cells. Spheres formed
after cells were transferred onto low-attachment plates. The spheres about 40 µm in
diameter were harvested for transplantation into the distal colon. The cell culture
in vitro took roughly 1520 days prior to transplantation. (B–E)
Transplantable NCSC cell derivation from DRG explants, proliferation, passage and
sphere formation. Phase contrast micrographs taken at different time points in the
cell culture. (B) Cells migrated out of the DRG explants and formed a dense layer on
the collagen after 1–2 days. (C) Cells that migrated out of the DRG explant
proliferated almost to confluence until the next passage. (D) Cells in the primary
culture were dissociated into single cells and re-seeded at 1 × 104
cells/cm2 as a monolayer on 6-well plates. (E) Cells were passaged and
formed spherical aggregates on low-attachment plates in NPPM. These spheres were used
for transplantation into the distal colon of mice. Scale bars, 100 μm. (F–L)
DRG-derived NCSCs with EGFP fluorescence (F, J) cultured as primary culture passage
were immunostained with the NSC marker Nestin (G) and the NCSC markers Sox10 (H) and
P75 (K). Scale bars, 100 μm. (M) Most cells had immunoreactivity to the NCSC markers
P75, Sox10 and the NSC marker Nestin as the expression proportion showed in the
histogram.
DRG-derived neural crest stem cells isolation, proliferation, and characterization in
vitro. (A) Schematic representation of the workflow of DRG-NCSC derivation,
proliferation, and transplantation into the distal intestine of postnatal mice. Pieces
of mouse lumbar DRGs were placed on the 24-well plate in the primary medium. Cells
migrated out after 1–2 days and were designated as passage 0 cells. Spheres formed
after cells were transferred onto low-attachment plates. The spheres about 40 µm in
diameter were harvested for transplantation into the distal colon. The cell culture
in vitro took roughly 1520 days prior to transplantation. (B–E)
Transplantable NCSC cell derivation from DRG explants, proliferation, passage and
sphere formation. Phase contrast micrographs taken at different time points in the
cell culture. (B) Cells migrated out of the DRG explants and formed a dense layer on
the collagen after 1–2 days. (C) Cells that migrated out of the DRG explant
proliferated almost to confluence until the next passage. (D) Cells in the primary
culture were dissociated into single cells and re-seeded at 1 × 104
cells/cm2 as a monolayer on 6-well plates. (E) Cells were passaged and
formed spherical aggregates on low-attachment plates in NPPM. These spheres were used
for transplantation into the distal colon of mice. Scale bars, 100 μm. (F–L)
DRG-derived NCSCs with EGFP fluorescence (F, J) cultured as primary culture passage
were immunostained with the NSC marker Nestin (G) and the NCSC markers Sox10 (H) and
P75 (K). Scale bars, 100 μm. (M) Most cells had immunoreactivity to the NCSC markers
P75, Sox10 and the NSC marker Nestin as the expression proportion showed in the
histogram.
NPs Can Be Induced from DRG-Derived NCSCs
To explore the differentiation ability of DRG-NCSCs into peripheral neurons and glia
cells, DRG-derived cells at passage 2 were transferred onto
poly-ornithine/fibronectin-coated coverslips in neural differentiation medium for 10–14
days. Besides the pan-neuronal markers TuJ1 (β-tubulin), NF200, and PGP9.5, the peripheral
neuron marker Peripherin and the enteric neural marker NOS (neuronal nitric oxide
synthase, nNOS) were also detected on the DRG-derived cells (Fig 2 and Fig S2). In glia differentiation medium,
which consisted of N2, B27, bFGF, EGF, and 5% serum, most of the cells were
TuJ1+ (77.8% ± 9.7%, n = 3) and a smaller proportion showed
the expression of the glia cell marker S100β (36.7% ± 11.2%, n = 3)
(Fig 2D), which indicated that
the DRG-derived NCSCs were able to differentiate into peripheral neurons and glia cells,
and could be induced to become NPs after two passages.
Fig 2.
Immunocytochemical analyses of the differentiation ability of DRG-derived NCSCs.
(A,B) Immunostaining of DRG-derived NSCs cultured in neural differentiation condition
for 2 weeks. The differentiation into neurons was confirmed by immunostaining of
neuron markers TuJ1 and Peripherin. Scale bars, 100 μm. (C) Some cells expressed the
enteric subtype neuron marker nNOS. Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI. Scale bars,
100μm. Terminal differentiation into neurons and glial cells as recognized by
antibodies of neuron markers TuJ1 and glia marker S100β. Scale bars, 100 μm. (D).
Immunostaining of DRG-derived NSCs which were cultured in glia differentiation
condition for 2 weeks. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Immunocytochemical analyses of the differentiation ability of DRG-derived NCSCs.
(A,B) Immunostaining of DRG-derived NSCs cultured in neural differentiation condition
for 2 weeks. The differentiation into neurons was confirmed by immunostaining of
neuron markers TuJ1 and Peripherin. Scale bars, 100 μm. (C) Some cells expressed the
enteric subtype neuron marker nNOS. Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI. Scale bars,
100μm. Terminal differentiation into neurons and glial cells as recognized by
antibodies of neuron markers TuJ1 and glia marker S100β. Scale bars, 100 μm. (D).
Immunostaining of DRG-derived NSCs which were cultured in glia differentiation
condition for 2 weeks. Scale bars, 100 μm.
DRG-Derived EGFP-Expressing NPs Migrated and Projected Nerve Fibers Following
Transplantation into the Postnatal Mouse Hindgut
To determine whether DRG-NPs populate in the postnatal mouse colon, DRG-NPs harvested
from EGFP+ mice were surgically implanted into the external muscle layer of the
distal colon of 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6 J mice. The cells used for transplantation were
in short-term culture for no more than three passages, because cells in mid-term and
long-term culture have been reported to often differentiate into smooth muscle cells after
growth factors are withdrawn[38]. The recipient colons were examined at 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 weeks after surgery
with 6–7 mice at each time point. Exogenous cells and neurites survived in 39 of 40
transplanted mouse colons, in which 6 of 6 were found available for 8 weeks following
transplantation.We first explored the ability of DRG-NPs to colonize in the wild type postnatal mouse
hindgut. EGFP+ cells existed in the cryosections of the host gut 1–8 weeks
after transplantation. This proved that exogenous DRG-NPs survived and engrafted in the
host gut (Fig 3A1–E). Following
the cell injection, numerous EGFP+ cells migrated away from the injection sites
without specific direction. The migration distance exceeded 2.0 mm as shown in the figure,
which was photographed and stitched together in the same plane (Fig. 3A2–A4), and the maximum distance of the
observed migration in different planes in the colon was >3.5 mm. We observed
EGFP+ distribution throughout the distal gut with many cells exhibiting TuJ1
staining (Fig 3A2–E, Fig 4 A–D, Fig S3 A–D). These results
indicated that DRG-derived EGFP+ NPs were competent for colonization of the gut
tube and contributed to enteric neurogenesis.
Fig 3.
DRG-derived GFP-expressing neural progenitors migrated mainly to the muscle layer
with their neurites extending from exogenous neural spheres after implantation into
the postnatal mouse hindgut. (A1) Composite image of low-magnification views of a
whole-mount preparation of the distal colon showing the colonization in the distal
intestine at 6 weeks after transplantation of the DRG-NPs (generated from the
explants). Migration of graft-derived cells away from the original transplantation
sites (circle) was observed. Fig 3A1 are stitched together with six continuous
picture. Scale bars, 100 µm. (A2–A4) The immunostaining of the longitudinal section
showed the distribution of neural cell body and its fiber elongation of exogenous
DRG-NPs. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) The average neurite length for elongation increased
with time after transplantation into the distal hindgut. (C–E) immunostaining of the
transverse section showed the distribution in the muscle layer of exogenous DRG-NPs.
EGFP+ cells were observed in the mouse colon wall where they were mainly
localized between the longitudinal muscle (LM) and circular muscle (CM) layers.
Sections of mouse colon were counterstained in blue with DAPI to identify the cell
nuclei. The colocalization of EGFP+ with TuJ1 staining (A4, E) indicated
that most of the grafted cells had differentiated into neurons. To help identify the
location of the grafted cells, fluorescent images of three channels were superimposed
together. Scale bars, 20 µm.
Fig 4.
Grafted EGFP+ cells showed that DRG-NPs were capable of differentiating
into neurons and glia cells after implantation into the distal colon. (A–D) The
longitude sections staining showed that most of graft-derived EGFP cells had
immunoreactivity to pan-neural marker TuJ1 in the distal colon of mice. Ganglion-like
clusters from graft-derived cells formed with cells expressing the neuronal marker
TuJ1 in longitude sections of the distal colon 3 weeks after transplantation. (D) GFP
was co-localized with TuJ1 staining in the ganglion-like cluster. Scale bars, A–C, 100
µm; D, 20 µm. (E–G) The longitudinal sections staining showed that a small part of the
graft-derived EGFP cells had immunoreactivity to glia marker S100β in the distal
colon. The box in (F–H) shows the exact match of EGFP and S100β staining in the cell
morphology. Transections of mouse colon were counterstained in blue with DAPI to
identify cell nuclei. Scale bars, 100 µm.
DRG-derived GFP-expressing neural progenitors migrated mainly to the muscle layer
with their neurites extending from exogenous neural spheres after implantation into
the postnatal mouse hindgut. (A1) Composite image of low-magnification views of a
whole-mount preparation of the distal colon showing the colonization in the distal
intestine at 6 weeks after transplantation of the DRG-NPs (generated from the
explants). Migration of graft-derived cells away from the original transplantation
sites (circle) was observed. Fig 3A1 are stitched together with six continuous
picture. Scale bars, 100 µm. (A2–A4) The immunostaining of the longitudinal section
showed the distribution of neural cell body and its fiber elongation of exogenous
DRG-NPs. Scale bars, 100 μm. (B) The average neurite length for elongation increased
with time after transplantation into the distal hindgut. (C–E) immunostaining of the
transverse section showed the distribution in the muscle layer of exogenous DRG-NPs.
EGFP+ cells were observed in the mouse colon wall where they were mainly
localized between the longitudinal muscle (LM) and circular muscle (CM) layers.
Sections of mouse colon were counterstained in blue with DAPI to identify the cell
nuclei. The colocalization of EGFP+ with TuJ1 staining (A4, E) indicated
that most of the grafted cells had differentiated into neurons. To help identify the
location of the grafted cells, fluorescent images of three channels were superimposed
together. Scale bars, 20 µm.Grafted EGFP+ cells showed that DRG-NPs were capable of differentiating
into neurons and glia cells after implantation into the distal colon. (A–D) The
longitude sections staining showed that most of graft-derived EGFP cells had
immunoreactivity to pan-neural marker TuJ1 in the distal colon of mice. Ganglion-like
clusters from graft-derived cells formed with cells expressing the neuronal marker
TuJ1 in longitude sections of the distal colon 3 weeks after transplantation. (D) GFP
was co-localized with TuJ1 staining in the ganglion-like cluster. Scale bars, A–C, 100
µm; D, 20 µm. (E–G) The longitudinal sections staining showed that a small part of the
graft-derived EGFP cells had immunoreactivity to glia marker S100β in the distal
colon. The box in (F–H) shows the exact match of EGFP and S100β staining in the cell
morphology. Transections of mouse colon were counterstained in blue with DAPI to
identify cell nuclei. Scale bars, 100 µm.Many EGFP+ projections diffused from exogenous cell bodies in different
directions. Fluorescence imaging showed that most of the EGFP+ cells exhibited
neuron-like morphologies and showed fiber extension (Fig 3A1–A4). The fibers elongated over time after
transplantation, and the average fiber length was 0.17mm + 0.018 mm at 1 week, 0.23 mm +
0.01 mm at 3 weeks, and 0.34 mm + 0.04 mm at 7 weeks after transplantation
(n = 3 experiments). These results showed that the DRG-NPs survived,
migrated, and fibers extended from the transplantation site following transplantation into
the postnatal distal gut.
DRG-Derived NPs Differentiated into Neurons and Glial Cells in the Distal Gut
We next examined whether exogenous neurons and glial cells were present after the
transplantation of EGFP+ DRG-NPs. We found that transplanted DRG-NPs
differentiated into neurons based on the immuno-staining of the pan-neuronal cell marker
TuJ1 in the longitudinal and transverse section, and glial cells indicated by the staining
of glial cell marker S100β in the longitudinal section. Double immunofluorescence staining
of grafted EGFP+ cells showed the co-localization of EGFP with TuJ1 and S100β
individually (Fig 4 A–H, Fig S3
A–D). Four weeks after transplantation Tuj1-expressing cells accounted for 86% ± 5% of all
cells (n = 4 experiments). The result showed that most of the grafted
cells differentiated into neurons, while some DRG-derived cells differentiated into glia
cells (8% ± 1.5%, n = 3 experiments) (Fig S3 E). These results suggested
that engrafted DRG-NPs survived and differentiated in the distal colon of recipient
mice.Some exogenous clusters similar to enteric ganglia were found a distance away from the
transplantation site 4 weeks after transplantation (Fig 4A–D). Most of cells in the ganglion-like
clusters are TuJ1+ cells (Fig
4A–C). It showed that the transplanted DRG-NPs were capable of forming the
ganglion-like clusters in the colon.
DRG-Derived NPs Differentiated into Neurons with Appropriate Enteric Subtypes
There are numerous types of neurons in the ENS in mice[1]. We used published markers (nNOS, VIP and TH) to identify the neurons and enteric
subtype neurons in the mice 4 weeks after transplantation[23]. Some EGFP+ neurons and fibers showed positive immunostaining to nNOS
(Fig 5A–D), vasoactive
intestinal polypeptide (VIP) (Fig
5E–H), and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (Fig 5I–K). Grafted cells differentiated into
different proportions of enteric subtypes as indicated by the presence of nNOS (26% ± 6%,
n = 4 experiments), TH (12% ± 3%, n = 4 experiments)
and VIP (21% ± 5%, n = 3 experiments) (Fig 5 L). These data showed that the niche in the
postnatal colon supported the differentiation of enteric subtype neuron with relative
neurochemical marker.
Fig 5.
Subtypes of neurons were determined in the section staining after the transplantation
of DRG-NPs into the distal colon of mice. The colocalization of EGFP+ with
NOS (A–D), VIP (E–H), and TH (I–K) staining indicated that a subpopulation of grafted
cells differentiated into enteric subtypes. (D, H) The two pictures showed the inset
part of (C) and (G) in higher magnification. Immunostaining showed the co-localization
of exogenous EGFP+ cells with nNOS and VIP individually. (A–H)
Immunostaining of the longitudinal section. Scale bars are 100 µm in (A, B, C, E, F,
G) and 20 µm in (D, H). (I–K) Immunostaining of the transverse section. Scale bars, 20
µm. (L) The proportions of cells positive for the enteric subtype neuron markers nNOS,
TH, and VIP. Sections of mouse colon were counterstained in blue with DAPI to identify
the cell nuclei. Fluorescent images of three channels were superimposed together.
Subtypes of neurons were determined in the section staining after the transplantation
of DRG-NPs into the distal colon of mice. The colocalization of EGFP+ with
NOS (A–D), VIP (E–H), and TH (I–K) staining indicated that a subpopulation of grafted
cells differentiated into enteric subtypes. (D, H) The two pictures showed the inset
part of (C) and (G) in higher magnification. Immunostaining showed the co-localization
of exogenous EGFP+ cells with nNOS and VIP individually. (A–H)
Immunostaining of the longitudinal section. Scale bars are 100 µm in (A, B, C, E, F,
G) and 20 µm in (D, H). (I–K) Immunostaining of the transverse section. Scale bars, 20
µm. (L) The proportions of cells positive for the enteric subtype neuron markers nNOS,
TH, and VIP. Sections of mouse colon were counterstained in blue with DAPI to identify
the cell nuclei. Fluorescent images of three channels were superimposed together.DRG-NPs colonized the appropriate gut layers, and the mature presynaptic protein
synaptophysin expressed in conjunction of exogenous and endogenous cells.To explore the location in the gut wall where EGFP+ cells and fibers migrated,
we examined the longitudinal and transverse frozen sections from post-surgery mice using
confocal microscopy. The staining of the transverse section at 4 weeks after
transplantation showed that transplanted EGFP+ cells were present mainly in the
inter-myenteric layer of the intestine (Fig 3 C–E, Fig 5 I–K,
Fig 6 A–D). Graft-derived
TuJ1+ cells were present in the group of cells that remained in the
longitudinal muscle, circular muscle, and mucosa of the intestine (Fig 3 C–E, Fig S3 A–D). Furthermore, exogenous
TH+ cells were detected in the longitudinal muscle and circular muscle layer
of the intestine (Fig 5 I-K).
Fig 6.
Exogenous DRG-NCSCs expressed synaptophysin in the circular muscle (CM) in the
intestine 5 weeks after transplantation. (A) Transplanted EGFP+ cells
migrated into the CM of the gut. Scale bar, 100 µm. (B-C) Synaptophysin (SYP)
expression is identified in the CM area and mucosa area (as indicated by the arrows).
Scale bars, 100 µm. (D) The merged image in high resolution from A, B, and C shows the
presence of synaptophysin in the EGFP+ cells which migrated into the CM
area. Scale bars, 20 µm.
Exogenous DRG-NCSCs expressed synaptophysin in the circular muscle (CM) in the
intestine 5 weeks after transplantation. (A) Transplanted EGFP+ cells
migrated into the CM of the gut. Scale bar, 100 µm. (B-C) Synaptophysin (SYP)
expression is identified in the CM area and mucosa area (as indicated by the arrows).
Scale bars, 100 µm. (D) The merged image in high resolution from A, B, and C shows the
presence of synaptophysin in the EGFP+ cells which migrated into the CM
area. Scale bars, 20 µm.Graft-derived neurites were found to exist in the longitudinal and circular muscle
layers, and these neurites closely associated with endogenous neurons and muscles of the
recipient animal as shown by synaptophysin staining (Fig 6 A–D; Fig S4 A–H). The layers where exogenous
cells located were alike to the endogenous neurons’ location. It showed that
EGFP+ neurons localized in the submucosa, and neurites were similarly found
in the mucosa as endogenous fibers. These results indicated that DRG-derived cells and
neurites expressed the mature presynaptic protein synaptophysin with endogenous neurons
and muscles in these layers.
Transplanted DRG-NPs Differentiated into Neurons with Active
Electrophysiology
In order to test whether transplanted neurons were electrophysiologically functional, in
situ Ca2+ imaging was performed 4–6 weeks after DRG-NP implantation. We
determined the changes in Ca2+ concentration upon a brief high K+ exposure (70
µM, 15 s) through a continuous perfusion system (2 ml min–1). Grafted neurons
responded with a rise in Ca2+ concentration (2 ± 0.55 F/F0, cells from the
region of interest) (Fig 7A–D).
These results showed that the surroundings of the postnatal colon support that DRG-NPs
differentiate into functional neurons with active electrophysiology.
Fig 7.
Engrafted EGFP+ cells in the colon showed transient calcium response to
glutamate in situ. Four regions of interest (ROI) are shown as arrows. (A) Engrafted
EGFP+ cells showing Rhod-2 fluorescence under basal conditions. Scale
bar, 100 µm. (B) Following stimulation with high K+ in 70 nm, the engrafted
EGFP+ cells responded with increased Ca2+ concentrations as
shown by increased Rhod-2 fluorescence. Scale bar, 100 µm. (C) Engrafted
EGFP+ cells in the colon showed the co-localization with TuJ1 staining in
some exogenous cells. Scale bar, 100 µm. (D) Traces corresponding to each ROI shown in
A–C.
Engrafted EGFP+ cells in the colon showed transient calcium response to
glutamate in situ. Four regions of interest (ROI) are shown as arrows. (A) Engrafted
EGFP+ cells showing Rhod-2 fluorescence under basal conditions. Scale
bar, 100 µm. (B) Following stimulation with high K+ in 70 nm, the engrafted
EGFP+ cells responded with increased Ca2+ concentrations as
shown by increased Rhod-2 fluorescence. Scale bar, 100 µm. (C) Engrafted
EGFP+ cells in the colon showed the co-localization with TuJ1 staining in
some exogenous cells. Scale bar, 100 µm. (D) Traces corresponding to each ROI shown in
A–C.
Discussion
The neural crest originates from the neural folds during vertebrate development. Neural
crest cells migrate from the dorsal neural tube to different locations including the gut,
dorsal root ganglion, heart, face, skin, etc., where they differentiate into different kinds
of cells, including peripheral nervous systems including ENS and non-peripheral nervous
systems containing smooth muscle cells, bone, and cartilage cells. Based on the
developmental principle, NCSCs might be cell sources for gut neuropathy therapy. We thus
hypothesized that those postnatal tissue-derived NCSCs from tissues other than the gut have
the ability to reconstruct ENS tissues in vivo. DRG-derived NCSCs were
chosen to explore this possibility based on the potential for multilineage differentiation
into neurons, glial cells, myofibroblasts, and pericytes[32,38].In spite of the possibility of DRG-NPs for ENS formation, considering previous reports on
the low proportion of neuron differentiation for DRG-derived NCSC[33,38], we optimized the generation of NPs from the isolated postnatal DRG, and these cells
exhibited high rates of differentiation into peripheral neurons in vitro
and in vivo. We were able to direct a high proportion of neuron
differentiation as opposed to glia cells. The in vitro expression pattern
of DRG-NPs was different from previous studies, which showed the inclined differentiation
into Schwann cells[33,38]. At 3 weeks after transplantation, the majority of graft cells were TuJ1+
and a small portion were S100β+ cells. The colon circumstances redirect adult
DRG-NPs into more subtypes of enteric neurons following transplantation compared with the
environment in vitro. These findings showed that most DRG-NPs
differentiated into neurons and to a lesser extent into glial cells. In general, our data
indicated that DRG-NPs effectively differentiated into neurons both in
vitro and in vivo.The neural stem cells/progenitors used for HD disease treatment should meet the following
requirements, including migration, differentiation into enteric subtype neurons, integration
into the local neural circuitry with the appropriate neurochemical and electrophysiological
characteristics following transplantation into the postnatal colon[23]. In the present study, we showed that NPs, which were generated from DRG-NCSCs,
survived, migrated, integrated, and differentiated into glial cells as well as diverse
subtype neurons with similar neurochemical and electrophysiological properties to endogenous
enteric neurons.The gut contains a range of enteric subtype neurons, which are pivotal in controlling
muscle contractile activity[44,45]. In this study, exogenous DRG-NPs differentiated into neurons alike to normal enteric
neurons in terms of morphological and neurochemical markers such as nNOS, VIP, and TH[23,46,47].The neural circuitry in charge of motility requires accurate connection among different
functional neurons and muscles. Our findings indicated that exogenous DRG-NP cells were
distributed in layers similar to those of the NCSC derivatives that act during normal
development. We observed that DRG-NP-derived EGFP+ neurons projected into the
appropriate gut layer and expressed the mature presynaptic protein synaptophysin. It has
been reported that enteric NPs are capable of differentiating into neurons with
electrophysiological activity and are possibly functional in the gut[23,25]. Our results showed that exogenous neurons were also capable of electrophysiological
activity after transplantation in vivo.It was reported that some of the endogenous sensory neurons were found in the submucosal plexus[48,49]. Submucosal ganglia may be very important for the gut’s normal function. In our
study, graft-derived cells and fibers were also observed in the submucosa. This was slightly
different from previous work that used ENSCs for colon transplantation[23].One of the principle challenges for stem cell therapy in bowel motility is to decide which
source of stem cells is most efficacious. However, it is currently difficult to define the
best candidate. Each candidate of stem/progenitor cells possesses certain disadvantages and
advantages, and the principles for utilizing each one depends on the desired applications
and outcomes. The most attractive characteristics of enteric neural stem cells are the
avoidance of immune suppression and ethical issues because the cells are patient-derived
autologous cells. However, the limited quantity and limited ability in proliferation of
these cells might be a major hurdle for clinical use[16,17]. Another issue is that the congenital defect gene in transplanted cells of HDpatients has to be corrected prior to autologous cells transplantation, and gene correction
is difficult because of the limited proliferation of enteric NCSC. Human ESCs are another
promising cell source for bowel motility disease, and they could potentially provide the
huge numbers of human enteric neurons needed for clinical use[13]. Nevertheless, some questions remain to be answered before human ESCs/iPSCs can be
used for clinical therapy, especially questions related to bowel motility evaluation and
safety concerns[50,51]. Future studies investigating these issues should not be limited to any single
population of cells because information provided from the research of individual cell type
will benefit the HD field as a whole[27].Considering the therapeutic purpose and their confined location, exploitation of DRG-NPs
for autograft seems impractical. Much research has suggested that fetal stem cells have
greater multilineage capacity than adult stem cells, and hence have greater potential for
clinical use. Fetal grafts might be integrated into the host with lower immunogenicity by
the host, or under HLA match[52]. Considering the limited proliferation of autologous cells and the huge demand for
cell numbers in cell therapy of ENS disease, our present findings suggest that isolation of
human DRG-NPCs from postmortem tissues, surgical specimens, or aborted fetus might be
attempted as a way to produce neural progenitors for allograft[53] for clinical use under conditions where HLAs match.This study may broaden the range of candidates for cell replacement of ENS cells. Our data
showed that NCSC from DRG, which harbor NCSCs, have similar differentiation potential as
functional enteric neurons in vivo as enteric NCSC. It can be presumed that
other tissues where NCSCs are maintained, such as hair follicles, skin, and teeth, might
also be reasonable sources of cells for enteric regeneration. Thus, our study suggests
important avenues for future studies into the development of cell therapies for treating
intestine neuropathies.
Conclusion
On the whole, DRG-neural progenitor cells migrated and differentiated into enteric neuron
subtypes and glia cells, established close connections with inherent enteric neurons and
smooth muscles with physiological functions, and integrated into the neuronal circuitry in
the postnatal gut. This suggested the potential for stem cells from allografts such as fetal
or postmortem tissues to replace diseased or missing ENS in HD under HLA match. The function
of the colon in the HD model mice following DRG-NP transplantation requires further
investigation.Click here for additional data file.Supplementary_Material for DRG-Derived Neural Progenitors Differentiate into Functional
Enteric Neurons Following Transplantation in the Postnatal Colon by Hui Hu, Yuanyuan Ding,
Wenbo Mu, Ying Li, Yanpeng Wang, Weifang Jiang, Yong Fu, Jinfa Tou, and Wei Chen in Cell
Transplantation
Authors: Jack T Mosher; Kelly J Yeager; Genevieve M Kruger; Nancy M Joseph; Mark E Hutchin; Andrzej A Dlugosz; Sean J Morrison Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2006-10-24 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Jens Hjerling-Leffler; Frédéric Marmigère; Mikael Heglind; Anna Cederberg; Martin Koltzenburg; Sven Enerbäck; Patrik Ernfors Journal: Development Date: 2005-05-04 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Laura Menendez; Michael J Kulik; Austin T Page; Sarah S Park; James D Lauderdale; Michael L Cunningham; Stephen Dalton Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Richard M Lindley; Daniel B Hawcutt; M Gwen Connell; Sarah L Almond; Sarah N Almond; Maria-Giuliana Vannucchi; Maria Simonetta Faussone-Pellegrini; David H Edgar; Simon E Kenny Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-03-22 Impact factor: 22.682