Literature DB >> 26863197

Deriving human ENS lineages for cell therapy and drug discovery in Hirschsprung disease.

Faranak Fattahi1,2,3, Julius A Steinbeck1,2, Sonja Kriks1,2, Jason Tchieu1,2, Bastian Zimmer1,2, Sarah Kishinevsky1,2,3, Nadja Zeltner1,2, Yvonne Mica1,2, Wael El-Nachef4, Huiyong Zhao4, Elisa de Stanchina4, Michael D Gershon5, Tracy C Grikscheit6, Shuibing Chen7, Lorenz Studer1,2.   

Abstract

The enteric nervous system (ENS) is the largest component of the autonomic nervous system, with neuron numbers surpassing those present in the spinal cord. The ENS has been called the 'second brain' given its autonomy, remarkable neurotransmitter diversity and complex cytoarchitecture. Defects in ENS development are responsible for many human disorders including Hirschsprung disease (HSCR). HSCR is caused by the developmental failure of ENS progenitors to migrate into the gastrointestinal tract, particularly the distal colon. Human ENS development remains poorly understood owing to the lack of an easily accessible model system. Here we demonstrate the efficient derivation and isolation of ENS progenitors from human pluripotent stem (PS) cells, and their further differentiation into functional enteric neurons. ENS precursors derived in vitro are capable of targeted migration in the developing chick embryo and extensive colonization of the adult mouse colon. The in vivo engraftment and migration of human PS-cell-derived ENS precursors rescue disease-related mortality in HSCR mice (Ednrb(s-l/s-l)), although the mechanism of action remains unclear. Finally, EDNRB-null mutant ENS precursors enable modelling of HSCR-related migration defects, and the identification of pepstatin A as a candidate therapeutic target. Our study establishes the first, to our knowledge, human PS-cell-based platform for the study of human ENS development, and presents cell- and drug-based strategies for the treatment of HSCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26863197      PMCID: PMC4846424          DOI: 10.1038/nature16951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


The in vitro derivation of human ENS lineages from hPSCs has remained elusive despite the great medical needs. The ENS develops from both the vagal and sacral NC. We focused on the vagal NC that generates the majority of the ENS and migrates caudally to colonize the entire length of the bowel[2]. Current NC differentiation protocols[3] result in SOX10+ NC precursors that are HOX negative (indicative of anterior/cranial identity; cranial NC (CNCs)). In contrast, vagal NC identity is characterized by the expression of specific, regionally restricted HOX genes including HOXB3[4] and HOXB5[5]. Retinoic acid (RA) has been used previously as an extrinsic factor to shift the regional identity of CNS precursors from anterior to more caudal fates during motoneuron specification[6]. Here we tested whether the addition of RA can similarly direct the regional identity in NC lineages and induce the expression of vagal markers (). Upon RA exposure we obtained Sox10::GFP+ NC precursors with yields comparable to CNC conditions, indicating that RA treatment does not interfere with overall NC induction (). To facilitate the isolation of pure NC populations we performed a candidate surface marker screen and identified CD49D (α4-integrin) as an epitope that reliably marks early SOX10+ NC lineages (). We next used CD49D to demonstrate robustness of RA-based NC induction across hPSC lines (both human embryonic (hESCs) and induced pluripotent (hiPSCs) stem cells; ). Purified CD49D+ NC precursors, derived in the presence of RA, expressed HOXB2-B5 indicative of vagal identity[4,5] but not more caudal HOX transcripts such as HOXB9 (). In further agreement with vagal identity, CD49D+, RA-treated NC precursors expressed markers of early enteric NC (ENC) lineages[2] including PAX3, EDNRB and RET (). Given the paucity of developmental data on human ENC development we performed RNAseq analysis in hESC-derived ENC precursors, in cranial NC (CNC) (no RA), in melanocyte-biased NC (MNC) () and in stage-matched CNS precursors[7]. Unsupervised clustering reliably segregated the transcriptomes of all hPSC-derived NC populations away from CNS precursors and further subdivided the various NC sublineages (). The most differentially expressed genes in the ENC compared to CNS lineage included general NC markers such as FOXD3 or TFAP2A but also PAX3 and HOX genes related to the ENC lineage (). CNC and MNC were also enriched in general NC markers but showed high levels of NEUROG1, ISL1 or MLANA, TYR, DCT expression respectively, compatible with their subtype identity (). Direct comparison of the various NC lineages yielded novel candidate marker of human vagal NC/ ENC lineage (). A list of the top 200 enriched transcripts for each NC lineage is provided (). RNAseq data are available at GEO http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ accession#: GSE66148. One key functional property of the ENC is the ability to migrate extensively and to colonize the gut[2]. RFP-labeled, CD49D+ purified () hPSC-derived ENC precursors were injected into the developing chick embryo at the level of the vagal NC. Transplanted human cells migrated along the trunk of the embryo () and colonized the gut (22 embryos of 57 injected; ). In contrast, stage-matched CNC or MNC precursor targeted cranial regions (CNC) or followed a trajectory along the dermis (MNC) (). To address whether hESC-derived ENC precursors are capable of recreating ENS neuronal diversity we maintained purified CD49D+ ENC precursors in 3D spheroids for 4 days followed by differentiation as adherent cultures in the presence of ascorbic acid and GDNF (). The 3D spheroid step was required to retain high levels of SOX10::GFP expression (). Replating of 3D spheroids under differentiation conditions yielded immature neurons expressing Tuj1 and the enteric precursor marker PHOX2A (day 20; ). The majority of PHOX2A+ cells were positive for TRKC (NTRK3), a surface marker expressed in enteric neuron precursors[8] suitable for enrichment for PHOX2A+ and ASCL1+ precursors (). Temporal expression analyses () showed maintenance of ENC neuronal precursor marker expression by day 40 of differentiation () followed by an increase in the percentage of mature neurons by day 60 (). In agreement with enteric neuron identity we observed a broad range of neurotransmitter phenotypes including 5HT+, GABA+ and NOS+ neurons. The presence of these neurotransmitters in neurons derived from CD49D+ purified NC precursors indicates ENC origin, since those neurotransmitters are not expressed in other NC lineages. Indeed, no 5HT+ neurons were observed in parallel cultures derived from HOX-negative, CD49D+ cells (). CNC-derived precursors differentiated into tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expressing neurons () and gave rise to TRKB- (NTRK2) rather than TRKC-positive precursors suggesting enrichment for sympathetic neuron lineages (). A major function of the ENS is the control of peristaltic gut movements. We probed the functionality of in vitro derived enteric neurons by assessing connectivity with smooth muscle cells (SMCs). hESC-derived SMCs were generated via a mesoderm intermediate following exposure to activin A and BMP4 in vitro[9] and culture in the presence of TGFβ (). The resulting SMC progenitors expressed ISL1 and were immunoreactive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) (). For connectivity studies, enteric neurons were derived from a hESC line expressing channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-EYFP under control of the human Synapsin promoter. An optogenetic reporter line[10] was used to allow for light-induced control of neuronal activity (). GABA+ and 5HT+ neurons in these co-cultures were closely associated with SMCs (). Interestingly, co-culture of day 25 neurons with SMCs triggered accelerated neuronal maturation as illustrated by the increased expression of SYN::EYFP (). Conversely, hESC-derived SMCs also showed signs of accelerated maturation under co-culture conditions as illustrated by the expression of mature markers (MYH11, AchR; ) and the ability to contract in response to pharmacological stimulation (,). While no spontaneous contractions were observed under co-culture conditions, a wave of SMC contractions could be triggered 5-10 seconds following light-mediated activation (10 Hz frequency) of SYN::ChR2-EYFP neurons (). Interestingly, both light- and drug-induced SMC contractions were slow and involved the movement of sheet-like structures suggesting coordination among cells possibly via gap junction-mediated coupling. These studies demonstrate functional connectivity between hESC-derived enteric neurons and SMCs. In vivo interactions of the ENS within the gut, however, are more complex and involve multiple cell types. As a first step in modeling those interactions in 3D, we used a tissue engineering approach combining in vitro derived human ENC precursors (CD49D+; day 15) with murine primary intestinal tissue (). Using our previously established protocols to form organoid units[11], the recombined tissue constructs were seeded onto a scaffold and implanted onto the omentum of immunodeficient hosts for maturation in vivo[11]. Human cells were readily detected within gut-like structures using the human-specific SC121 and synaptophysin. Importantly, cells were located both in epithelial and muscle layers (), showing their ability to interact with both target cell types. Transplantation of hPSC-derived precursors could yield novel therapeutic opportunities for ENS disorders such as HSCR. Children suffering from HSCR are currently treated by surgical removal of the aganglionic portion of the gut. While life-saving, the surgery does not address dysfunction of the remaining GI tract in surviving patients[12]. Furthermore, therapeutic options in patients with total aganglionosis are limited. A major challenge in developing a cell therapy for HSCR is the need to repopulate the ENS over extensive distances. Previous studies tested the transplantation of variety of candidate cell sources into the fetal or postnatal colon[13,14]. Murine, fetal-derived ENC precursors resulted in the most promising data with evidence of functional integration but limited in vivo migration[15]. To assess the ability of hESC-derived enteric NC precursors to migrate within the postnatal or adult colon (3-6 weeks of age), we performed orthotopic (OT) injections of CD49D+ RFP-labeled precursors in NOD-scid IL2Rgammanull (NSG) mice (). Cells were injected into the wall of the cecum aiming for the muscle layer () and resulting in a well-defined deposit of RFP+ cells 1 hour after injection (; left panel; ; top panel). Remarkably, 2 – 4 weeks after transplantation, RFP+ cells had migrated extensively and repopulated the host colon over its entire length (). The grafted ENC precursors formed clusters along the colon (; right panel) expressing TUJ1 (. In contrast, stage-matched CNS and CNC precursors, grafted under identical conditions, showed limited migration (). Given the extraordinary ability of the grafted cells to repopulate the host colon, we tested whether those cells could provide therapeutic benefit in an HSCR model. One widely used genetic model is the EDNRB mouse[16]. These mice develop a megacolon due to aberrant peristalsis. As a consequence, mutant mice show high mortality by 4-6 weeks of age. EDNRB mice were injected at 2-3 weeks after birth with RFP+ hESC-derived enteric NC precursors (treatment group) or with matrigel vehicle (control group). The majority of control-injected animals (n = 6) died over a period of 4-5 weeks () with a megacolon-like pathology (). In contrast, all animals injected with hESC-derived NC precursors (n=6) survived (). Grafted animals were assessed for graft survival and migration at 6-8 weeks of age. Whole mount fluorescence imaging confirmed migration of hESC-derived ENC precursors within the HSCR colon (. Preliminary studies showed a trend towards an improved GI transit time in grafted versus the small subset of matrigel treated animals that survived beyond 6 weeks of treatment, as measured using carmine dye gavage (). Histological analyses at 6 weeks and 3 months after transplantation confirmed myenteric and submucosal localization of human cells in HSCR colon. While the location mimicked aspects of endogenous ENS, there was a preference towards submucosal region (, upper panel). Human cells were also detected in the distal colon (, lower panel) where only few endogenous TUJ1+ cells were detected. Immunocytochemistry for SC121 and human-specific synaptophysin, not detected in matrigel injected animals (), confirmed human identity and pre-synaptic marker expression (, right panel). In addition to neuronal cells () we also observed human cells expressing glial marker including GFAP (). Neuron subtype specific markers in SC121+ human cells included 5-HT, GABA and NOS (). Our findings demonstrate that wild-type hPSC-derived ENS precursors can repopulate the colon of HSCR mice. However, HSCR-causing mutations often affect the migration of ENS precursor in a cell autonomous manner[2,17]. Therefore, developing patient-matched cell therapies for HSCR may require complementary genetic or pharmacological strategies to overcome intrinsic migration defects of the transplanted cells. As causative genetic defects in HSCR patients are often not known or complex[2,18] gene correction prior to transplantation may not be possible. We therefore assessed whether hPSC-derived ENS precursors can be used to model HSCR and serve as a platform to screen for candidate compounds that could overcome disease-related migration defects. In a first step we established isogenic hESC lines with homozygous loss-of-function mutations in EDNRB using CRISPR/Cas-based gene targeting techniques[19] (). Loss of function mutations in EDNRB are a well-known genetic cause in a subset of HSCR patients[20]. Enteric NC precursors could be derived at comparable efficiencies from EDNRB-mutant and control lines (). However, CD49D+ ENC precursors from four EDNRB −/− clones showed a striking migration defect when using the scratch assay to model aspects of HSCR phenotype[21] (). We next assessed whether EDNRB−/− ENCs display major differences in cell proliferation or survival as compared to wild-type ENCs. At 24 hours after replating (time point used for scratch assay) we did not observe differences in either assay (). By 72 hours, EDNRB−/− ENCs did show reduced proliferation while cell viability remained unaffected (). We next carried out a small molecule screen to identify compounds capable of rescuing the migration defects observed in EDNRB mutant ENC precursors (). We screened 1280 compounds (Prestwick Chemical Library®) comprised of FDA-approved drugs. Results were binned into compounds with no effect, toxic effects, modest effects or strong effects (). The hits were further validated by repeating scratch assay under non-HTS conditions (. Compounds with strong effects were chosen for further follow-up. Among those validated compounds we focused on the molecule Pepstatin A which showed a dose-dependent rescue of the migration defect in EDNRB−/− hESC derived NC precursors (). Pepstatin A is a known inhibitor of acid proteases[22]. Among potential Pepstatin targets we explored BACE2 because RNAseq data showed upregulation in hESC-derived NC lineages () and BACE-2 had been recently shown to modulate migration of NC derivatives in the developing zebrafish embryo[23]. To address whether BACE2 mediates the Pepstatin A effect, we tested structurally unrelated small molecules targeting BACE2. Exposure to the BACE inhibitor IV rescued migration defect in the scratch assay similar to Pepstatin A (). Furthermore, BACE2 knockdown confirmed rescue of the migration defect in EDNRB−/− cells (). Finally, we tested whether Pepstatin A exposure in vitro is sufficient to rescue the in vivo migration behavior of EDNRB−/− ENC precursors (). ENC precursors derived from EDNRB−/− cells exhibit a significant in vivo migration defect following transplantation into the adult colon (). EDNRB-null precursors pre-treated with Pepstatin A for 72 hours before transplantation showed a significant rescue of in vivo migration (). Interestingly, wild-type derived ENC precursors treated with pharmacological inhibitors of EDNRB showed migration defects in vitro and in vivo () further supporting a role for EDNRB in human ENC migration and HSCR. Our study describes an efficient strategy to derive and prospectively purify ENC precursors from hESCs. In agreement with studies in model organisms[1,2] we demonstrate that hESC-derived ENC gives rise to a broad range of neurotransmitter phenotypes characteristic of the ENS. The ability to model human ENS development in vitro should enable the large-scale production of specific human enteric neurons on demand. For example hPSC-derived enteric 5HT-neurons could serve as a tool to model GI side effects of CNS-acting drugs such as Prozac[1]. We focused primarily on potential cell therapeutic applications of hESC-derived ENC lineages in HSCR. One of the most remarkable findings was the extensive in vivo migratory potential of human ENC precursors in the adult host colon. Future studies will have to define whether this ability is confined to early CD49D+ cells or maintained at later neurogenic stages. Similarly, it will be important to look at long-term efficacy and safety. While most of our in vivo studies in NSG mice (a total of 102 animals grafted) were limited to a 5-6 week survival period, animals analyzed at 3-4 months after transplantation showed comparable in vivo properties without evidence of tumor formation or graft-related adverse effects. The therapeutic potential of the cells is illustrated by their ability to rescue EDNRB mice. Future studies will be required to address mechanisms of the graft-mediated host rescue. The potential for widespread engraftment may eventually enable permanent, bona fide repair of the aganglionic portions of the gut. However, given the rapid action of the cells in preventing death of HSCR mice, it appears unlikely that rescue was mediated by functional integration of the cells. Future studies should also address alternative mechanisms such as cytokine release, immunomodulation or changes in barrier function for contributing to the therapeutic effect. The identification of Pepstatin A and BACE2 inhibition in rescuing HSCR-related migration defects represents proof-of-concept for the use of hESC-derived ENC precursors in drug discovery. The mechanism of BACE-2 inhibition on migration remains to be elucidated. Possible targets of BACE proteases include neuregulins and ErbB receptors previously implicated in NC migration[24,25]. One obvious future direction is testing the therapeutic potential of BACE inhibitors in mouse models of HSCR. Such a strategy could enable the prevention of aganglionosis during pregnancy or enable repair of postnatal enteric neuron function. In the current study we focused on combining Pepstatin A as a neoadjuvant treatment to promote migration of EDNRB−/− enteric NC precursors. An important next question is whether Pepstatin A-pretreated cells are capable of rescuing lethality or other disease-associated phenotypes in HSCR mice. In conclusion, our work presents a powerful strategy to access human ENS lineages for exploring the “second brain[1]” in human health and disease and for developing novel cell- and drug-based therapies for HSCR.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Culture of undifferentiated human Embryonic Stem cells (hESCs)

hESC line H9 (WA-09) and derivatives (SOX10::GFP; SYN::ChR2-EYFP; SYN::EYFP;PHOX2B:GFP ;EF1::RFP EDNRB−/−) as well as 2 independent hiPSC lines (healthy and Familial Dysautonomia, Sendai-based, OMSK (Cytotune)) were maintained on mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF, Global Stem, Rockville, MD) in KSR (Life Technologies, 10828-028) containing hESC medium as described previously[7]. Cells were subjected to mycoplasma testing at monthly intervals and STR profiled to confirm cell identity at the initiation of the study.

Neural Crest induction

hESCs were plated on matrigel (BD Biosciences, 354234) coated dishes (105 cells/cm2) in hESC medium containing 10nM FGF2 (R&D Systems, 233-FB-001MG/CF). Differentiation was initiated in knockout serum replacement (KSR) medium (KO DMEM+15% KSR (Life Technologies, 10828-028), L-glutamine (Life Technologies, 25030-081), NEAA (Life Technologies, 11140-050) containing LDN193189 (100nM, Stemgent, Cambridge, MA) and SB431542 (10μM, Tocris, Ellisville, MI). The KSR medium was gradually replaced with increasing amounts of N2 medium from day 4 through day 10 as described previously[7]. For Cranial NC (CNC) induction, cells are treated with 3μM CHIR99021 (Tocris Bioscience, 4423) in addition to LDN193189 and SB431542 from day 2 through day 11. Enteric NC (ENC) differentiation involves additional treatment with Retinoic Acid (10μM) from day 6 through day11. For deriving Melanocyte-competent NC (MNC), LDN193189 is replaced with BMP4 (10nM, R&D, 314-bp) and EDN3 (10nM, American Peptide company, 88-5-10B) from day 6 through day 11[3]. The differentiated cells are sorted for CD49D at day 11. CNS precursor control cells were generated by treatment with LDN193189 and SB431542 from day 0 through day 11 as previously described[7]. Throughout the manuscript, day 0 is the day the medium is switched from hESC medium to LDN193189 and SB431542 containing medium. Days of differentiation in text and figures refer to the number of days since the pluripotent stage (day 0).

FACS and Immunofluorescence analysis (IF)

For IF, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Affymetrix-USB, 19943) for 20 minutes, then blocked and permeabilized using 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) (Thermo Scientific, 23209) and 0.3% triton X-100 (Sigma, T8787). The cells were then incubated in primary antibody solutions overnight at 4°C (Celsius) and stained with fluorophore conjugated secondary antibodies at RT for 1 hour The stained cells were then incubated with DAPI (1 ng/ml, Sigma, D9542-5MG) and washed several times before imaging. For Flow Cytometry analysis, the cells are dissociated with Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies, AT104) and fixed and permeabilized using BD Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Bioscience, 554722) solution, then washed, blocked and permeabilized using BD Perm/Wash buffer (BD Bioscience, 554723) according to manufacturer's instructions. The cells are then stained with primary (overnight at 4°C) and secondary (30 min at room temperature) antibodies and analyzed using a flow Cytometer (Flowjo software). A list of primary antibodies and working dilutions is provided in Supplementary . The PHOX2A antibody was kindly contributed by Dr. J-F Brunet (Rabbit, 1:800 dilution).

In ovo transplants

Fertilized eggs (from Charles River farms) were incubated at 37°C for 50 hours before injections. 2×105 CD49D sorted, RFP labeled NC cells were injected into the intersomitic space of the vagal region of the embryos targeting a region between somite 2 and 6 (HH 14 embryo, 20-25 somite stage). The embryos were harvested 36 hours later for whole mount epifluorescence and histological analyses.

Gene expression analysis

For RNA sequencing, total RNA was extracted using RNeasy RNA purification kit (Qiagen, 74106). For qRT-PCR assay, total RNA samples were reverse transcribed to cDNA using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies, 18064-014). qRT-PCR reactions were set up using QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR mix (Qiagen, 204148). Each data point represents three independent biological replicates.

In vitro differentiation of ENC to enteric neurons

ENC cells from the 11 day induction protocol were aggregated into 3D spheroids (5 million cells/well) in Ultra Low Attachment 6-well culture plates (Fisher Scientific, 3471) and cultured in Neurobasal (NB) medium supplemented with L-Glutamine (Gibco, 25030-164), N2 (Stem Cell Technologies, 07156) and B27 (Life Technologies, 17504044) containing CHIR99021 (3uM, Tocris Bioscience, 4423) and FGF2 (10nM, R&D Systems, 233-FB-001MG/CF). After 4 days of suspension culture, the spheroids are plated on Poly Ornithine/Laminin/Fibronectin (PO/LM/FN) coated dishes (prepared as described previously[26]) in Neurobasal (NB) medium supplemented with L-Glutamine (Gibco, 25030-164), N2 (Stem Cell Technologies, 07156) and B27 (Life Technologies, 17504044) containing GDNF (25 ng/ml, Peprotech, 450-10) and Ascorbic acid (100 uM, Sigma, A8960-5G). The ENC precursors migrate out of the plated spheroids and differentiate into neurons in 1-2 weeks. The cells were fixed for immunostaining or harvested for gene expression analysis at Day 25, Day 40 and Day 60 of differentiation.

Induction of SMCs

Mesoderm specification is carried out in STEMPRO-34 (Gibco, 10639-011) medium. The hESCs are subjected to Activin A treatment (100ng/ml, R&D, 338-AC-010) for 24 hours followed by BMP4 treatment (10ng/ml, R&D, 314-bp) for four days[9]. The Cells are then differentiated into SMC progenitors by treatment with PDGF-BB (5 ng/ml, Peprotech, 100-14B) , TGFb3 (5 ng/ml, R&D systems, 243-B3-200) and 10% FBS. The SMC progenitors are expandable in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS.

EN-SMC co-culture

The SMC progenitors were plated on PO/LM/FN coated culture dishes (prepared as described previously[26]) three days before addition of ENC-derived neurons. The neurons were dissociated (using accutase, Innovative Cell Technologies, AT104) at day 30 of differentiation and plated onto the SMC monolayer cultures. The culture is maintained in Neurobasal (NB) medium supplemented with L-Glutamine (Gibco, 25030-164), N2 (Stem Cell Technologies, 07156) and B27 (Life Technologies, 17504044) containing GDNF (25 ng/ml, Peprotech, 450-10) and Ascorbic acid (100 uM, Sigma, A8960-5G). Functional connectivity was assessed at 8-16 weeks of co-culture.

Pharmacological and optogenetic stimulations of co-cultured SMCs

SMC only and SMC-ENC-derived neuron co-cultures were subjected to Acetylcholine chloride (50μM, Sigma, A6625), Carbamoylcholine chloride (10μM, Sigma,C4382) and KCl (55mM) Fisher scientific, BP366-500) treatment, 3 months after initiating the co-culture. Optogenetic stimulations were performed using a 450 nm pigtailed diode pumped solid state laser (OEM Laser, PSU-III LED, OEM Laser Systems, Inc) achieving an illumination between 2 and 4 mW/mm2. The pulse width was 4 ms and stimulation frequencies ranged from 2 to 10 Hz. For the quantification of movement, images were assembled into a stack using Metamorph software and regions with high contrast were identified (labeled yellow in fig. S5). The movement of 5 representative high contrast regions per field was automatically traced (Metamorph software). Data is presented in kinetograms as movement in pixels in x and y direction (distance) with respect to the previous frame.

Generation of chimeric tissue engineered colon (TEC)

We used the previously described method for generation of TEC [11]. Briefly, the donor colon tissue was harvested and digested into organoid units using dispase (Life Technologies, 17105-041) and collagenase type 1 (Worthington, CLS-1). The organoid units were then mixed immediately (without any in vitro culture) with CD49D purified hESC-derived ENC precursors (day 15 of differentiation) and seeded onto biodegradable Polyglycolic Acid Scaffolds (2-mm sheet thickness, 60 mg cm-3 bulk density; porosity > 95%, Concordia Fibers, Coventry RI) shaped into 2mm long tubes with Poly- L Lactide (PLLA) (Durect Corporation). The seeded scaffolds were then placed onto and wrapped in the greater omentum of the adult (>2 months old) NSG mice. Just prior to the implantation, these mice were irradiated with 350 cGY. The seeded scaffolds were differentiated into colon-like structures inside the omentum for 4 additional weeks before they were surgically removed for tissue analysis.

Transplantation of ENC precursors in adult colon

All mouse procedures were performed following NIH guidelines, and were approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) as well as the Embryonic Stem Cell Research Committee (ESCRO). 3-6 week old male NSG (NOD.Cg-Prkdc/SzJ) mice or 2-3 weeks old EDNRBs-l/s-l (SSL/LeJ) mice[27] (n=12, 6 male, 6 female) were used for these studies. Animal numbers were based on availability of homozygous hosts and on sufficient statistical power to detect large effects between treatment versus control (EDNRBs-l/s-l) as well as for demonstrating robustness of migration behavior (NSG). Animals were randomly selected for the various treatment paradigms (NSG and EDNRB s-l/s-l) but assuring for equal distribution of male/female ratio in each group (EDNRB s-l/s-l). Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (1%) throughout the procedure, a small abdominal incision was made, abdominal wall musculature lifted and the cecum is exposed and exteriorized. Warm saline is used to keep the cecum moist. 20 μl of cell suspension (2-4 million RFP+ CD49D purified hESC-derived ENC precursors) in 70% matrigel (BD Biosciences, 354234) in PBS or 20 μl of 70% matrigel in PBS only (control grafted animals) were slowly injected into the cecum (targeting the muscle layer) using a 27-gauge needle. Use of 70% matrigel as carrier for cell injection assured that the cells stayed in place following the injection and prevented backflow into peritoneum. After injection that needle was withdrawn, and a Q-tip was placed over the injection site for 30 seconds to prevent bleeding. The cecum was returned to the abdominal cavity and the abdominal wall was closed using 4-0 vicryl and a taper needle in an interrupted suture pattern and the skin was closed using sterile wound clips. After wound closure animals were put on paper on top of their bedding and attended until conscious and preferably eating and drinking. The tissue was harvested at different time points (ranging from two weeks to four months) after transplantation for histological analysis. EDNRBs-l/s-l mice were immunosuppressed by daily injections of cyclosporine (10mg/kg i.p, Sigma, 30024).

Whole mount fluorescence imaging and histology

The harvested colon samples were fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C overnight before imaging. Imaging is performed using Maestro fluorescence imaging system (Cambridge Research and Instrumentation). The tissue samples were incubated in 30% sucrose (Fisher Scientific, BP220-1) solutions at 4°C for 2 days then embedded in OCT (Fisher Scientific, NC9638938) and cryosectioned. The sections were then blocked with 1% BSA (Thermo Scientific, 23209) and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma, T8787). The sections are then stained with primary antibody solution at 4°C overnight and fluorophore conjugated secondary antibody solutions at room temperature for 30 minutes. The stained sectioned were then incubated with DAPI (1 ng/ml, Sigma, D9542-5MG) and washed several times before they were mounted with Vectashield Mounting Medium (vector, H1200) and imaged using fluorescent (Olympus IX70) or confocal microscopes (Zeiss SP5).

Total GI transit time

Mice are gavaged with 0.3 ml of dye solution containing 6% carmine (Sigma, C1022-5G), 0.5% methylcellulose (Sigma, 274429-5G) and 0.9 NaCl, using a #24 round-tip feeding needle. The needle was held inside the mouse esophagus for a few seconds after gavage to prevent regurgitation. 1 hour later, the stool color was monitored for gavaged mice every 10 minutes. For each mouse, total GI transit time is between the time of gavage and the time when red stool is observed.

Gene targeting

The double nickase CRISPR/Cas9 system[28] was used to target the EDNRB locus in EF1::RFP H9 hESCs. Two guide RNAs were designed (using the CRISPR design tool http://crispr.mit.edu/) to target the coding sequence with PAM targets ~20 bp apart (qRNA #1 target specific sequence: AAGTCTGTGCGGACGCGCCCTGG, RNA #2 target specific sequence: CCAGATCCGCGACAGGCCGCAGG). The cells were transfected with gRNA constructs and GFP-fused Cas9-D10A nickase. The GFP expressing cells were FACS purified 24 hours later and plated in low density (150 cells/cm2) on MEFs. The colonies were picked 7 days later and passaged twice before genomic DNA isolation and screening. The targeted region of EDNRB gene was PCR amplified (forward primer: ACGCCTTCTGGAGCAGGTAG, reverse primer: GTCAGGCGGGAAGCCTCTCT) and cloned into Zero Blunt TOPO vector (Invitrogen, 450245). To ensure that both alleles (from each hESC colony) are represented and sequenced, we picked 10 bacterial clones (for each hESC clone) for plasmid purification and subsequent sequencing. The clones with bi-allelic nonsense mutations were expanded and differentiated for follow-up assays.

Migration assay

The ENC cells are plated on PO/LM/FN coated (prepared as described previously[26]) 96well or 48well culture plates (30,000/cm2). 24 hours later the culture lawn is scratched manually using a pipette tip. The cells are given an additional 24-48 hours to migrate into the scratch area and fixed for imaging and quantification. The quantification is based on the percentage of the nuclei that are located in the scratch area after the migration period. The scratch area is defined using a reference well that was fixed immediately after scratching. Migration of cells was quantified using the open source data analysis software KNIME[29] (http://knime.org) with the “Quantification in ROI” plug-in as described in detail elsewhere[30].

Proliferation assay

To quantify proliferation, FACS purified ENC cells were assayed using CyQUANT NF cell proliferation Assay Kit (Life Technologies, C35006) according to manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, to generate a standard, cells were plated at various densities and stained using the fluorescent DNA binding dye reagent. Total fluorescence intensity was then measured using a plate reader (excitation at 485 nm and emission detection at 530 nm). After determining the linear range, the CD49D+ WT and EDNRB−/− ENC precursors were plated (6000 cell/cm2) and assayed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hrs. The cells were cultured in Neurobasal (NB) medium supplemented with L-Glutamine (Gibco, 25030-164), N2 (Stem Cell Technologies, 07156) and B27 (Life Technologies, 17504044) containing CHIR99021 (3uM, Tocris Bioscience, 4423) and FGF2 (10nM, R&D Systems, 233-FB-001MG/CF) during the assay.

Viability assay

To monitor the viability of WT and EDNRB−/− ENC precursors, cells were assayed for LDH activity using CytoTox 96 cytotoxicity assay kit (Promega, G1780). Briefly, the cells are plated in 96 well plates at 30,000/cm2. The supernatant and the cell lysate is harvested 24 hours later and assayed for LDH activity using a plate reader (490nm absorbance). Viability is calculated by dividing the LDH signal of the lysate by total LDH signal (from lysate plus supernatant). The cells were cultured in Neurobasal (NB) medium supplemented with L-Glutamine (Gibco, 25030-164), N2 (Stem Cell Technologies, 07156) and B27 (Life Technologies, 17504044) containing CHIR99021 (3μM, Tocris Bioscience, 4423) and FGF2 (10nM, R&D Systems, 233-FB-001MG/CF) during the assay.

High throughput screening

The chemical compound screening was performed using the Prestwick Chemical Library®. The ENC cells were plated in 96 well plates (30,000/cm2) and scratched manually 24 hours before addition of the compounds. The cells were treated with two concentrations of the compounds (10μM and 1μM). The plates were fixed 24 hours later for total plate imaging. The compounds were scored based on their ability to promote filling of the scratch in 24 hours. The compounds that showed toxic effects (based on dramatic reduction in cell numbers assessed by DAPI staining) were scored 0, compound with no effects were scored 1, compound with moderate effects were scored 2 and compound with strong effects (that resulted in complete filling of the scratch area) were scored 3 and identified as hit compounds. The hits were further validated to ensure reproducibility. The cells were treated with various concentrations of the selected hit compound (Pepstatin A) for dose response analysis. The optimal dose (10μM-based on optimal response and viability) was used for follow-up experiments. For the pre-treatment experiments, cells were CD49D purified at day 11 and treated with Pepstatin A from day 12 through day 15 followed by transplantation into the colon wall of NSG mice. The cells were cultured in Neurobasal (NB) medium supplemented with L-Glutamine (Gibco, 25030-164), N2 (Stem Cell Technologies, 07156) and B27 (Life Technologies, 17504044) containing CHIR99021 (3uM, Tocris Bioscience, 4423) and FGF2 (10nM, R&D Systems, 233-FB-001MG/CF) during the assay.

BACE2 inhibition and Knockdown

To inhibit BACE2, the ENC precursors were treated with 1 μM β-Secretase Inhibitor IV (CAS 797035-11-1 – Calbiochem). To Knockdown BACE2, cells were dissociated using accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies, AT104) and reverse-transfected (using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX-Life Technologies, 13778-150) with a siRNA pool (SMARTpool: ON-TARGETplus BACE2 siRNA, Dharmacon, L-003802-00-0005) or 4 different individual siRNAs (Dharmacon, LQ-003802-00-0002 2 nmol). The Knockdown was confirmed by qRT-PCR measurement of BACE2 mRNA levels in cells transfected with the BACE2 siRNAs vs. the control siRNA pool (ON-TARGETplus Non-targeting Pool, Dharmacon, D-001810-10-05). The transfected cells were scratched 24 hours after plating and fixed 48 hours later for migration quantification. The cells were cultured in Neurobasal (NB) medium supplemented with L-Glutamine (Gibco, 25030-164), N2 (Stem Cell Technologies, 07156) and B27 (Life Technologies, 17504044) containing CHIR99021 (3uM, Tocris Bioscience, 4423) and FGF2 (10nM, R&D Systems, 233-FB-001MG/CF) during the assay.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM and were derived from at least 3 independent experiments. Data on replicates (n) is given in figure legends. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test (comparing 2 groups) or ANOVA with Dunnett test (comparing multiple groups against control). Distribution of the raw data approximated normal distribution (Kolmogorov Smirnov normality test) for data with sufficient number of replicates to test for normality. Survival analysis was performed using log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Z-scores for primary hits were calculated as Z= (x-μ)/σ. X is the migration score value and is 3 for all hit compounds. μ is the mean migration score value and σ is the standard deviation for all compounds and DMSO controls (n=224).

Characterization of hESC-derived NC populations

a) Schematic illustration of Cranial NC (CNC) and Melanocyte competent NC (MNC) induction protocols[3]. b) Flow cytometry for CD49D and SOX10::GFP in CNC and MNC cells. c) Immunofluorescence of unsorted and CD49D sorted differentiated NC cells for SOX10. d) Flow cytometry for CD49D in ENC derived from H9 hESCs and control and Familial Dysautonomia hiPSCs. e,f) Representative immunofluorescence images and flow cytometry in hESC-derived ENC for enteric precursor lineage marker at day 11. g) List of the top 10 and selected additional most differentially expressed transcripts from the RNASeq analysis of CNC compared to stage matched CNS precursors[31]. h) Lists of the top 10 and selected additional most differentially expressed transcripts from the RNASeq analysis of MNC compared to stage matched CNS precursors[31] i) Distribution of CNC and MNC cells in developing chick embryos at 24-36 hours after injection. Right panel: Higher power image of the clusters of MNC cells in the developing surface ectoderm. Abbreviations: NT= Neural Tube, NotoC= Notochord, S= Somite, Scale bars= 50 μm in c; 25 μm in e; 1 mm in i-left panel; 50 μm in middle and 25 μm in right panel.

Characterization of hESC-derived enteric neural lineages

a) Flow Cytometry for TRKC and PHOX2A expression. b) Immunofluorescence for PHOX2A and ASCL1 for TRKC positive and TRKC negative hESC-derived ENC precursors. c) Time course qRT-PCR analysis of enteric lineage markers during more extended in vitro differentiation periods. n=3 independent experiments. d,e) Flow cytometric quantification of enteric neuron precursor and neuronal markers in ENC-derived neurons at day 40 and 60 of differentiation. n=3 independent experiments. Scale bars= 50 μm; Abbreviation: FC= Fold Change.

CNC gives rise to neurons enriched in autonomic lineage

a-c) Representative immunofluorescence images for expression of 5-HT (Serotonin), TUJ1 and TH in CNC-derived neurons. In contrast to ENC-derived lineages no serotonergic (5HT+) neurons were detected under cranial conditions despite the presence of many Tuj1+ neurons and increased percentages of TH+ cells. d,e) Flow Cytometry for TRKB and TRKC under CNC and ENC conditions. n=3 independent experiments. Scale bars= 50 μm.

Functional characterization of hESC-derived enteric neurons in co-culture with SMCs

a) Schematic illustration of smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation protocol. b) Immunofluorescence staining of SMC progenitors for SMA and ISL1. c) Association of various ENC-derived neuron subtypes with SMA+ cells. d) Synapsin::EYFP expression in ENC-derived neurons at 40 days of co-culture with SMCs and stage matched neurons in the absence of SMCs. e) Monoculture of SMCs versus co-cultures of SMCs with ENC-derived neurons. Upper panels: phase contrast images showing morphological changes of SMCs in Co-culture. Lower panels: Immunofluorescence staining of mature SMC markers MYH11 and Acetylcholine Receptor (AchR) in monoculture of SMCs versus co-cultures of SMCs with ENC-derived neurons. f) Diagrams representing extent of contraction of SMC cultures. Arrows indicate the time of pharmacological stimulation. Scale bars= 50 μm in b,c,e; 100 μm in d.

Generation of tissue engineered colon using hESC-derived ENC precursors

a) Schematic illustration for generation of tissue engineered colon (TEC). b) TEC stained for human cytoplasmic marker SC121 and human specific Synaptophysin (hSYN). Dotted line shows approximate location of border between muscle and epithelial/submucosal-like layers. Scale bars = 20 μm in b-left and middle panels; 40 μm in b-right panel.

Characterization of transplanted hESC-ENC precursors in adult colon of NSG and EDNRB mice

a) Whole mount microscopy of colon transplanted with RFP+ CD49D purified hESC-ENC precursors to track RFP expression at injection site at 1 hour after transplantation to ensure that cells were injected at proper location, and at 2 weeks to show dispersal of the cells and congregation of subset of cells into distinct clusters. The dashed lines indicate the outer border of the intact colon tissue. b,c) Whole mount fluorescence imaging and quantification of migration of grafted RFP+ hESC-derived CNS precursors and CD49D purified CNC precursors inside the adult colon wall. d) Megacolon-like phenotype in control animals versus animals receiving hESC-derived ENC transplants. e,f) Whole mount fluorescence imaging and quantification of migration of grafted RFP+ CD49D purified hESC-ENC precursors in colon of EDNRB mice. g) Total GI transit times by carmine dye gavage of EDNRB mice grafted with RFP+ CD49D purified hESC-ENC precursors versus matrigel only grafted mice. n=3 for grafted animals, n=2 for matrigel group. Note: n=2 for matrigel group was due to the fact that nearly all matrigel injected animals died due to their disease phenotype. h) Representative images of grafted hESC-derived enteric NC precursors at 3 months after transplantation into the colon of EDNRB mice co-expressing TUJ1 and SC121. i) Immunofluorescence staining of cross sections of HD colons transplanted with matrigel or RFP+ hESC-derived ENC precursors showing expression of SC121 and human specific Synaptophysin (hSYN). j) Representative image of grafted hESC-derived enteric NC precursors at 3 months after transplantation into the colon of EDNRB mice expressing human specific GFAP (SC123). k,l) Representative images of grafted hESC-derived ENC precursors at 6 weeks after transplantation into the colon of NSG (WT) and EDNRB mice. The dashed lines indicate the border between submucosal and muscle layers. Scale bars= 200 μm in a; 1 cm in b and d; 100 μm in h-l; Abbreviation: AU= Arbitrary Unit. p-value for (g) is given numerically, t-test with Welch's correction; n = 3 independent experiments.

Establishing and characterizing EDNRB null hESC lines

a) Sequences of WT and Cas9-nickase induced bi-allelic nonsense mutations in targeted region of EDNRB−/− clones. b) Western blot analysis for EDNRB in hESC-derived ENC precursors showing lack of protein expression in mutant clones C1-C4. c) EDNRB−/− hESCs can be efficiently differentiated into CD49D+ hESC-derived ENC based on CD49D expression (c) and expression of SOX10 (data not shown). d) proliferation of EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC (day 11) versus WT-derived cells. n = 4 independent experiments. e) LDH activity measurement of cell viability in EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC (day 11) versus WT-derived cells. p-value in (d) is: * p < 0.05, t-test, n = 3 independent experiments.

Chemical screening for compounds that rescue migration of EDNRB−/− hESC-derived NC precursors

a) Schematic illustration of the time line and experimental steps involved in the chemical screening assay and migration scoring system. b) Example of a screening plate layout and locations of DMSO control wells. c) Migration scores of Prestwick library compounds and DMSO controls d) migration assay and scores for EDNRB−/− hESCs-derived ENC precursors treated with primary hit compounds. Z-score for primary hit compounds in (c) is given numerically (compared to DMSO control, n=224 technical replicates)

Pharmacological modulation of migration in hESC-derived ENC precursors

a) BACE2 expression in the various hESC-derived NC sublineages at day 11 as compared to stage-matched CNS precursors. b) qRT-PCR analysis to confirm knockdown of the BACE2 in CD49D purified EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC after siRNA transfection compared to control siRNA. c) Quantification of whole mount images of the colon of NSG mice transplanted with RFP+ CD49D purified WT and EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC precursors with or without Pepstatin A pre-treatment (compare to Fig. 4j). d) Representative images of WT CD49D purified hESC-derived ENC treated with EDN3 and BQ-788 (EDNRB inhibitor). e) Colon migration assay in WT hESC-derived ENC precursors following pretreatment with BQ788. f) Quantification of the data in (e). Scale bar = 1 cm in e; Abbreviations: AU= Arbitrary Unit.
Figure 4

EDNRB signaling regulates human ENC precursor cell migration

a) In vitro HSCR disease modeling paradigm. b-c) Representative images and quantification of scratch assay in RFP+/CD49D+ WT and EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC (clones 1-4), n=3 independent experiments. d) Illustration of chemical screen. e) Dose-response of Pepstatin A on migration of CD49D+ EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC. f) Quantification of CD49D+ EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC migration following treatment with Pepstatin A (10 μM) or BACE inhibitor IV (1 μM), n=3 independent experiments. g) Quantification of cell migration following BACE2 knockdown using pool of 5 different siRNAs or 4 individual siRNAs, n=3 independent experiments. h) Pepstatin A pre-transplantation treatment paradigm. i) Whole mount images of NSG colon transplanted with RFP+ CD49D purified WT and EDNRB−/− hESC-derived ENC precursors with or without Pepstatin A pre-treatment. j) Quantification of the fraction of animals with human cells present in colon at increasing distance from injection site - see , n ≥ 8 animals for each of the treatment groups. Scale bars= 200 μm in b; 1 cm in i. Data are mean ± SEM. p-values in c, f and h are: ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001; **** p < 0.0001 (ANOVA; Dunnett test (compared to wt)). p-values for analysis in l are given numerically, Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test; n ≥ 8 per for each group.

  29 in total

1.  Directed differentiation of embryonic stem cells into motor neurons.

Authors:  Hynek Wichterle; Ivo Lieberam; Jeffery A Porter; Thomas M Jessell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Patrick D Hsu; Chie-Yu Lin; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Silvana Konermann; Alexandro E Trevino; David A Scott; Azusa Inoue; Shogo Matoba; Yi Zhang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Neuregulin-1/glial growth factor stimulates Schwann cell migration by inducing α5 β1 integrin-ErbB2-focal adhesion kinase complex formation.

Authors:  Shuji Wakatsuki; Toshiyuki Araki; Atsuko Sehara-Fujisawa
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Extending the search for folk personality constructs: the dimensionality of the personality-relevant proverb domain.

Authors:  Heather A Haas
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-04

5.  Colonic motility after surgery for Hirschsprung's disease.

Authors:  C Di Lorenzo; G F Solzi; A F Flores; L Schwankovsky; P E Hyman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Feeder-free derivation of neural crest progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Nadja Zeltner; Fabien G Lafaille; Faranak Fattahi; Lorenz Studer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Grouping of histone deacetylase inhibitors and other toxicants disturbing neural crest migration by transcriptional profiling.

Authors:  Nadine Dreser; Bastian Zimmer; Christian Dietz; Elena Sügis; Giorgia Pallocca; Johanna Nyffeler; Johannes Meisig; Nils Blüthgen; Michael R Berthold; Tanja Waldmann; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  In vivo knockdown of ErbB3 in mice inhibits Schwann cell precursor migration.

Authors:  Tomohiro Torii; Yuki Miyamoto; Shuji Takada; Hideki Tsumura; Miyuki Arai; Kazuaki Nakamura; Katsuya Ohbuchi; Masahiro Yamamoto; Akito Tanoue; Junji Yamauchi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Functional Connectivity under Optogenetic Control Allows Modeling of Human Neuromuscular Disease.

Authors:  Julius A Steinbeck; Manoj K Jaiswal; Elizabeth L Calder; Sarah Kishinevsky; Andreas Weishaupt; Klaus V Toyka; Peter A Goldstein; Lorenz Studer
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  HOXB5 expression is spatially and temporarily regulated in human embryonic gut during neural crest cell colonization and differentiation of enteric neuroblasts.

Authors:  Ming Fu; Vincent Chi Hang Lui; Mai Har Sham; Annie Nga Yin Cheung; Paul Kwong Hang Tam
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.780

View more
  97 in total

1.  37/67-laminin receptor facilitates neural crest cell migration during enteric nervous system development.

Authors:  Ming Fu; Amanda J Barlow-Anacker; Korah P Kuruvilla; Gary L Bowlin; Christopher W Seidel; Paul A Trainor; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  The telomerase inhibitor AZT enhances differentiation and prevents overgrowth of human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural progenitors.

Authors:  Yao Hu; Kai-Heng Fang; Lu-Ping Shen; Shi-Ying Cao; Fang Yuan; Yuwen Su; Min Xu; Yufeng Pan; Yaoyu Chen; Yan Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Intestinal organoids in infants and children.

Authors:  Sinobol Chusilp; Bo Li; Dorothy Lee; Carol Lee; Paisarn Vejchapipat; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Single-injection ex ovo transplantation method for broad spinal cord engraftment of human pluripotent stem cell-derived motor neurons.

Authors:  Maria C Estevez-Silva; Akshitha Sreeram; Stephanie Cuskey; Nikolai Fedorchak; Nisha Iyer; Randolph S Ashton
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 5.  Hirschsprung disease - integrating basic science and clinical medicine to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Robert O Heuckeroth
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 6.  Innervation: the missing link for biofabricated tissues and organs.

Authors:  Suradip Das; Wisberty J Gordián-Vélez; Harry C Ledebur; Foteini Mourkioti; Panteleimon Rompolas; H Isaac Chen; Mijail D Serruya; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2020-06-05

7.  Trans-ethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for Hirschsprung disease.

Authors:  Clara Sze-Man Tang; Hongsheng Gui; Ashish Kapoor; Jeong-Hyun Kim; Berta Luzón-Toro; Anna Pelet; Grzegorz Burzynski; Francesca Lantieri; Man-Ting So; Courtney Berrios; Hyoung Doo Shin; Raquel M Fernández; Thuy-Linh Le; Joke B G M Verheij; Ivana Matera; Stacey S Cherny; Priyanka Nandakumar; Hyun Sub Cheong; Guillermo Antiñolo; Jeanne Amiel; Jeong-Meen Seo; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jung-Tak Oh; Stanislas Lyonnet; Salud Borrego; Isabella Ceccherini; Robert M W Hofstra; Aravinda Chakravarti; Hyun-Young Kim; Pak Chung Sham; Paul K H Tam; Maria-Mercè Garcia-Barceló
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  Pediatric enteric neuropathies: diagnosis and current management.

Authors:  Maggie L Westfal; Allan M Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 9.  Gene-environment interactions and the enteric nervous system: Neural plasticity and Hirschsprung disease prevention.

Authors:  Robert O Heuckeroth; Karl-Herbert Schäfer
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 10.  Engineering a second brain in a dish.

Authors:  Maxime M Mahe
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.