Literature DB >> 3043251

Improvement of IVDSA of the brachiocephalic arteries using a non-ionic contrast medium.

H O Thijssen1, J L Merx, M A Thijssen, A Keyser, H Schoonderwaldt, R Wong Chung.   

Abstract

The introduction of IVDSA provides a safer method of angiographic investigation of the aortic arch and brachiocephalic arteries than conventional angiography in patients with cerebro-vascular disease. The quality of visualization however decreases. Instead of changing over to IADSA we find it worthwile to try to improve IVDSA in different ways. One of them is represented in this prospective double blind cross-over study in which we have investigated the effects of using an isotonic non-ionic contrast medium, iohexol (omnipaque), in comparison to meglumin-sodium-diatrizoate (urografin) which is widely used. Iohexol causes less severe side-effects, less severe artifacts and a better image quality. A statistical relation between parameters could not be established. A lag-effect exists for side-effects. The necessity of using low osmolar contrast media is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3043251     DOI: 10.1007/BF00341830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  Omnipaque vs. Hexabrix in intravenous DSA of the carotid arteries: randomized double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  P H Nakstad; S J Bakke; O Kjartansson; J von Krogh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Comparison of brachiocephalic angiography and IVDSA in the same group of patients.

Authors:  H O Thijssen; J L Merx; J E Mostart; M A Thijssen; R W Chung; H Schoonderwaldt; A Keyser
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Radiological contrast media.

Authors:  R G Grainger
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Low-osmolality contrast media: premises and promises.

Authors:  B L McClennan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  F H Burbank; B R Bradley; S Yegnashankaran; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Some aspects of contrast medium chemotoxicity.

Authors:  P Dawson
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1983

7.  AUR Memorial Award. Determinants of contrast enhancement for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  F H Burbank
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Iohexol compared to meglumine-Ca-metrizoate in common carotid angiography. A randomized double blind cross-over study in man.

Authors:  P Nakstad; O Sortland; O Aaserud
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).

Authors:  A Karle; J Fries; S Laulund; E Andrew
Journal:  Diagn Imaging Clin Med       Date:  1986

10.  Contrast media and enzyme inhibition. I. Cholinesterase.

Authors:  P Dawson; D Edgerton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.039

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Quality analysis of DSA equipment.

Authors:  M A Thijssen; H O Thijssen; J L Merx; M P van Woensel
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Intra-venous digital subtraction angiography: an alternative method to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for experimental aneurysm imaging.

Authors:  Yong Hong Ding; Daying Dai; Debra A Lewis; Mark A Danielson; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Harry J Cloft; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 2.804

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.