Literature DB >> 3082163

Omnipaque vs. Hexabrix in intravenous DSA of the carotid arteries: randomized double-blind crossover study.

P H Nakstad, S J Bakke, O Kjartansson, J von Krogh.   

Abstract

A randomized double-blind crossover study using Omnipaque 350 mg l/ml (iohexol) and Hexabrix 320 mg l/ml (ioxaglate) in 53 patients undergoing intravenous digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries revealed no significant differences in image quality. Some differences were found in subjective side effects that favored Omnipaque. Nausea was reported in four patients after injection of Hexabrix, and a metallic taste was significantly more frequent (p less than 0.01) with this contrast medium. The patients' preference for Omnipaque was also statistically significant (p less than 0.01). It was concluded that both contrast media are suitable for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3082163      PMCID: PMC8332685     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  2 in total

1.  The new contrast agents: a perspective.

Authors:  M A Bettmann
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Improvement of IVDSA of the brachiocephalic arteries using a non-ionic contrast medium.

Authors:  H O Thijssen; J L Merx; M A Thijssen; A Keyser; H Schoonderwaldt; R Wong Chung
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.