Literature DB >> 3786748

Low-osmolality contrast media: premises and promises.

B L McClennan.   

Abstract

After more than 30 years of experience in the United States with high-osmolality, ionic, radiopaque contrast media (HOCM), low-osmolality contrast media (LOCM), both ionic and nonionic, have recently been introduced into the marketplace. Under the current atmosphere of cost controls (prospective payment system) and consumerism in medicine, the higher cost of these newer agents has sparked heated debate, with the lingering question, "Can we afford to use them?" The new LOCM are not the only "expensive" drugs undergoing an economically constrained introduction into clinical practice, but they represent a significant challenge for radiologists in terms of our doctor-patient relationships and the monetarization of medical care. Review of the extensive literature documenting improvement in patient acceptance, tolerance, and safety, with equal or improved diagnostic efficacy, suggests that the question now at hand is, "Can we afford not to use them?" This premise is discussed with text and references designed to aid the practicing radiologist and referring physician in developing guidelines for utilization of the new LOCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3786748     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.162.1.3786748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Nonionic contrast media: economic analysis and health policy development.

Authors:  V Goel; R B Deber; A S Detsky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Renal streak artifact during contrast-enhanced CT: comparison of low versus high osmolality contrast media.

Authors:  S K Sussman; F F Illescas; J P Opalacz; P Yirga; L C Foley
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1993

3.  Improvement of IVDSA of the brachiocephalic arteries using a non-ionic contrast medium.

Authors:  H O Thijssen; J L Merx; M A Thijssen; A Keyser; H Schoonderwaldt; R Wong Chung
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  An overview of the clinical pharmacokinetics of x-ray contrast media.

Authors:  M Bourin; P Jolliet; F Ballereau
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  The clinical application of radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  N E Leeds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Surveillance of patients post-endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  P Sharma; C Kyriakides
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.401

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.