Literature DB >> 30430755

Two-Photon Polymerization as a Tool for Studying 3D Printed Topography-Induced Stem Cell Fate.

Kristan S Worthington1, Anh-Vu Do2, Rasheid Smith2, Budd A Tucker3, Aliasger K Salem2.   

Abstract

Geometric topographies are known to influence cellular differentiation toward specific phenotypes, but to date the range of features and type of substrates that can be easily fabricated to study these interactions is somewhat limited. In this study, an emerging technology, two-photon polymerization, is used to print topological patterns with varying feature-size and thereby study their effect on cellular differentiation. This technique offers rapid manufacturing of topographical surfaces with good feature resolution for shapes smaller than 3 µm. Human-induced pluripotent stem cells, when attached to these substrates or a non-patterned control for 1 week, express an array of genetic markers that suggest their differentiation toward a heterogeneous population of multipotent progenitors from all three germ layers. Compared to the topographically smooth control, small features (1.6 µm) encourage differentiation toward ectoderm while large features (8 µm) inhibit self-renewal. This study demonstrates the potential of using two-photon polymerization to study and control stem cell fate as a function of substrate interactions. The ability to tailor and strategically design biomaterials in this way can enable more precise and efficient generation or maintenance of desired phenotypes in vitro and in vivo.
© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; differentiation; induced pluripotent stem cells; substrate topography; two-photon polymerization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30430755      PMCID: PMC6365162          DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Macromol Biosci        ISSN: 1616-5187            Impact factor:   4.979


  18 in total

1.  Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano-topography and fibroblast filopodia.

Authors:  M J Dalby; M O Riehle; H Johnstone; S Affrossman; A S G Curtis
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  The effect of topography on differentiation fates of matrigel-coated mouse embryonic stem cells cultured on PLGA nanofibrous scaffolds.

Authors:  Mohammad Massumi; Mozhgan Abasi; Hamideh Babaloo; Panieh Terraf; Mojtaba Safi; Mahdi Saeed; Jalal Barzin; Mojgan Zandi; Masoud Soleimani
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder.

Authors:  Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Rahul Tare; Abhay Andar; Mathis O Riehle; Pawel Herzyk; Chris D W Wilkinson; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-09-23       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 4.  Focal adhesion: a focal point in current cell biology and molecular medicine.

Authors:  Chuanyue Wu
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  In-chip fabrication of free-form 3D constructs for directed cell migration analysis.

Authors:  Mark Holm Olsen; Gertrud Malene Hjortø; Morten Hansen; Özcan Met; Inge Marie Svane; Niels B Larsen
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Kristopher A Kilian; Branimir Bugarija; Bruce T Lahn; Milan Mrksich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of aspect ratios of stem cells on lineage commitments with and without induction media.

Authors:  Xiang Yao; Rong Peng; Jiandong Ding
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Controlling cell behavior through the design of polymer surfaces.

Authors:  Natália M Alves; Iva Pashkuleva; Rui L Reis; João F Mano
Journal:  Small       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Nanoscale topography and chemistry affect embryonic stem cell self-renewal and early differentiation.

Authors:  Vanessa L S Lapointe; Ana Tiago Fernandes; Nia C Bell; Francesco Stellacci; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 9.933

10.  Surface Topography Guides Morphology and Spatial Patterning of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Colonies.

Authors:  Giulio Abagnale; Antonio Sechi; Michael Steger; Qihui Zhou; Chao-Chung Kuo; Gülcan Aydin; Carmen Schalla; Gerhard Müller-Newen; Martin Zenke; Ivan G Costa; Patrick van Rijn; Arnold Gillner; Wolfgang Wagner
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.765

View more
  4 in total

1.  Development of High-Resolution Three-Dimensional-Printed Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds and Their Compatibility with Pluripotent Stem Cells and Early Retinal Cells.

Authors:  Arwin Shrestha; Brittany N Allen; Luke A Wiley; Budd A Tucker; Kristan S Worthington
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Recent Advances in 3D Printing with Protein-Based Inks.

Authors:  Xuan Mu; Francesca Agostinacchio; Ning Xiang; Ying Pei; Yousef Khan; Chengchen Guo; Peggy Cebe; Antonella Motta; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 29.190

3.  A Tuneable, Photocurable, Poly(Caprolactone)-Based Resin for Tissue Engineering-Synthesis, Characterisation and Use in Stereolithography.

Authors:  Jonathan Field; John W Haycock; Fiona M Boissonade; Frederik Claeyssens
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 4.  Applications of nanotechnology in 3D printed tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Noah Z Laird; Timothy M Acri; Jaidev L Chakka; Juliana C Quarterman; Walla I Malkawi; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.589

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.