Literature DB >> 23852884

Nanoscale topography and chemistry affect embryonic stem cell self-renewal and early differentiation.

Vanessa L S Lapointe1, Ana Tiago Fernandes, Nia C Bell, Francesco Stellacci, Molly M Stevens.   

Abstract

Adherent cells respond to a wide range of substrate cues, including chemistry, topography, hydrophobicity, and surface energy. The cell-substrate interface is therefore an important design parameter in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering applications, where substrate cues are used to influence cell behavior. Thin films comprising 4.5 nm (average diameter) gold nanoparticles coated with a mixture of two alkanethiols can confer hemispherical topography and specific chemistry to bulk substrates. The behavior of murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs) on the thin films can then be compared with their behavior on self-assembled monolayers of the same alkanethiols on vapor-deposited gold, which lack the topographical features. Cells cultured both with and without differentiation inhibitors are characterized by immunofluorescence for Oct4 and qPCR for Fgf5, Foxa2, Nanog, Pou5f1, and Sox2. Nanoscale chemistry and topography are found to influence stem cell differentiation, particularly the early differentiation markers, Fgf5 and Foxa2. Nanoscale topography also affects Oct4 localization, whereas the chemical composition of the substrate does not have an effect. It is demonstrated for the first time that ESCs can sense topographical features established by 4.5 nm particles, and these findings suggest that nanoscale chemistry and topography can act synergistically to influence stem cell differentiation. This study furthers the understanding of the effects of these substrate properties, improving our ability to design materials to control stem cell fate.
Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  differentiation; embryonic stem cells; gold nanoparticles; nanotopography; self-renewal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23852884      PMCID: PMC5509010          DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201200382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   9.933


  38 in total

1.  Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time.

Authors:  M J Dalby; S Childs; M O Riehle; H J H Johnstone; S Affrossman; A S G Curtis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface.

Authors:  Molly M Stevens; Julian H George
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Controlling the phenotype and function of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro by adhesion to silane-modified clean glass surfaces.

Authors:  J M Curran; R Chen; J A Hunt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  One-step one-phase synthesis of monodisperse noble-metallic nanoparticles and their colloidal crystals.

Authors:  Nanfeng Zheng; Jie Fan; Galen D Stucky
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation.

Authors:  Benjamin G Keselowsky; David M Collard; Andrés J García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Self-renewal of embryonic stem cells through culture on nanopattern polydimethylsiloxane substrate.

Authors:  Kilsoo Jeon; Hyun-Jik Oh; Hyejin Lim; Jung-Hyun Kim; Duk Hyun Lee; Eung-Ryoung Lee; Bae Ho Park; Ssang-Goo Cho
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Weiqiang Chen; Luis G Villa-Diaz; Yubing Sun; Shinuo Weng; Jin Koo Kim; Raymond H W Lam; Lin Han; Rong Fan; Paul H Krebsbach; Jianping Fu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 8.  Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions.

Authors:  Manus Jonathan Paul Biggs; R Geoff Richards; Matthew J Dalby
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Combinatorial development of biomaterials for clonal growth of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ying Mei; Krishanu Saha; Said R Bogatyrev; Jing Yang; Andrew L Hook; Z Ilke Kalcioglu; Seung-Woo Cho; Maisam Mitalipova; Neena Pyzocha; Fredrick Rojas; Krystyn J Van Vliet; Martyn C Davies; Morgan R Alexander; Robert Langer; Rudolf Jaenisch; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 43.841

10.  Soft substrates promote homogeneous self-renewal of embryonic stem cells via downregulating cell-matrix tractions.

Authors:  Farhan Chowdhury; Yanzhen Li; Yeh-Chuin Poh; Tamaki Yokohama-Tamaki; Ning Wang; Tetsuya S Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Laser-based three-dimensional multiscale micropatterning of biocompatible hydrogels for customized tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Matthew B Applegate; Jeannine Coburn; Benjamin P Partlow; Jodie E Moreau; Jessica P Mondia; Benedetto Marelli; David L Kaplan; Fiorenzo G Omenetto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stable biofunctionalization of hydroxyapatite (HA) surfaces by HA-binding/osteogenic modular peptides for inducing osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Alessandro Polini; Jianglin Wang; Hao Bai; Ye Zhu; Antoni P Tomsia; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.843

3.  Two-Photon Polymerization as a Tool for Studying 3D Printed Topography-Induced Stem Cell Fate.

Authors:  Kristan S Worthington; Anh-Vu Do; Rasheid Smith; Budd A Tucker; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.979

4.  Biophysical restriction of growth area using a monodispersed gold sphere nanobarrier prolongs the mitotic phase in HeLa cells.

Authors:  Dae-Woong Jung; Hyun-Joo Ro; Junmin Kim; Seung Il Kim; Gi-Ra Yi; Gaehang Lee; Sangmi Jun
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 5.  Shaping Cell Fate: Influence of Topographical Substratum Properties on Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Sarita Kumari; Steven Vermeulen; Ben van der Veer; Aurélie Carlier; Jan de Boer; Deepa Subramanyam
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  Extracellular matrix elasticity and topography: material-based cues that affect cell function via conserved mechanisms.

Authors:  Isaac A Janson; Andrew J Putnam
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Graham G Walmsley; Adrian McArdle; Ruth Tevlin; Arash Momeni; David Atashroo; Michael S Hu; Abdullah H Feroze; Victor W Wong; Peter H Lorenz; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.307

8.  Fabrication of Submicro-Nano Structures on Polyetheretherketone Surface by Femtosecond Laser for Exciting Cellular Responses of MC3T3-E1 Cells/Gingival Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Dong Xie; Chenhui Xu; Cheng Ye; Shiqi Mei; Longqing Wang; Qi Zhu; Qing Chen; Qi Zhao; Zhiyan Xu; Jie Wei; Lili Yang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 9.  The extracellular matrix in development.

Authors:  David A Cruz Walma; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  Biological responses to nanomaterials: understanding nano-bio effects on cell behaviors.

Authors:  Xi-Qiu Liu; Rui-Zhi Tang
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.419

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.